How will energy transition impact the major EU natural gas suppliers?
Abstrakt
Artykuł porównuje strategie biznesowe dwóch najważniejszych dostawców gazu ziemnego do Unii Europejskiej – norweskiej firmy Equinor i rosyjskiego Gazpromu. Transformacja energetyczna w kierunku niskoemisyjnego systemu energetycznego oznacza nowe wyzwania dla firm z sektora ropy naftowej i gazu oraz konieczność ograniczania ich emisyjności, np. przez inwestycje w odnawialne źródła energii. Europejski Zielony Ład jest źródłem dodatkowej presji poprzez promowanie udziału gazu ze źródeł odnawialnych oraz ograniczanie emisji metanu w sektorze energii.
Słowa kluczowe
transformacja energetyczna; Europejski Zielony Ład; Equinor; Gazprom; wodór; emisje metanu
Bibliografia
Bach M. S., Is the Oil and Gas Industry Serious About Climate Action?, “Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development” 2017, vol. 59, No. 2.
Bousso R., Klesty V., Equinor-led group approves major Norwegian CO2 storage project, “Reuters” [online], 15 V 2020 [accessed: 17 V 2020], available at: <https://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idafl8N2cx5ik>.
Bradshaw M., Van de Graaf T., Connolly R., Preparing for the New Oil Order? Saudi Arabia and Russia, “Energy Strategy Reviews” 2019, vol. 26: 100374.
Cruz A. M., Krausmann E., Vulnerability of the Oil and Gas Sector to Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events, “Climatic Change” 2013, vol. 121, No. 1.
Dempsey H., Gas is ‘not a low-carbon fuel’, UK watchdog rules, “Financial Times” [online] 15 IX 2019 [accessed: 22 V 2020], available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/788005cc-d3e9-11e9-8367-807ebd53ab77>.
Henderson J., Yermakov V., Russian LNG: Becoming a Global Force, “OIES Paper”: NG 154, November 2019.
Karagiannopoulos L., Equinor sells its assets at U.S. Eagle Ford to Repsol for $325 million, “Reuters” [online], 7 XI 2019 [accessed: 10 V 2020], available at: <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-equinor-usa-divestiture-repsol/equinor-sells-its-assets-at-u-s-eagle-ford-to-repsol-for-325-million-iduskbn1xh2S9>.
Kardaś S., Nowa strategia energetyczna Rosji – optymistyczne plany w niepewnych czasach, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich. Komentarze, nr 325 [online], 15 IV 2020 [accessed: 8 V 2020], available at: <https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/komentarze_325.pdf>.
Kardaś S., W oczekiwaniu na rosyjską strategię wodorową, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich. Komentarze, nr 344 [online], 2 VII 2020 [accessed: 17 X 2020], available at: <https://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/komentarze-osw/2020-07-22/w-oczekiwaniu-na-rosyjska-strategie-wodorowa>.
Kędzierski M., Wodór – nadzieja niemieckiej polityki klimatycznej i przemysłowej, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich. Komentarze, nr 330 [online], 6 V 2020 [accessed: 22 V 2020], available at: <https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/file/komentarze_330_1.pdf>.
Kim T., Karpiński M., Clean energy progress after the Covid-19 crisis will need reliable supplies of critical minerals [online], 6 V 2020 [accessed: 22 V 2020], available at: <https://www.iea.org/articles/clean-energy-progress-after-the-covid-19-crisis-will-need-reliable-supplies-of-critical-minerals>.
Kolk A., Levy D., Corporate Strategy, Climate Change and Oil Multinationals, “Winds of Change” 2001, vol. 19, No. 5.
Levy D. L., Kolk A., Strategic Responses to Global Climate Change: Conflicting Pressures on Multinationals in the Oil Industry, “Business and Politics” 2002, vol. 4, No. 3.
Liebreich M., Separating Hype from Hydrogen – Part One: The Supply Side, “Bloomber NEF” [online], 8 X 2020 [accessed: 17 X 2020], available at: <https://about.bnef.com/blog/liebreich-separating-hype-from-hydrogen-part-one-the-supply-side/>.
Mitrova T. et al., Global Climatic Threat and Russian Economy: Searching for the Way, “Skolkovo Energy Center Report”, May 2020.
Nasiritousi N., Fossil Fuel Emitters and Climate Change: Unpacking the Governance Activities of Large Oil and Gas Companies, “Environmental Politics” 2017, vol. 26, No. 4.
Olczak M., Piebalgs A., How far should the new EU Methane Strategy go?, “FSR Policy Brief” 2019, issue 7, April 2019.
Pickl M. J., The Renewable Energy Strategies of Oil Majors – From Oil to Energy?, “Energy Strategy Reviews” 2019, vol. 26: 100370.
Pooley C. R., Pfeifer S., ‘Thank you Statoil! It’s been a pleasure’: Oil major changes name, “Financial Times” [online], 15 III 2018 [accessed: 22 II 2020], available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/071bba1a-282e-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0>.
Sæverud Andreassen I., Skjærseth J. B., Oil Companies and Climate Change: Inconsistencies between Strategy Formulation and Implementation?, “Global Environmental Politics” 2007, vol. 7, No. 3.
Shojaeddini E. et al., Oil and Gas Company Strategies Regarding the Energy Transition, “Progress in Energy” 2019, vol. 1, No. 1.
Simon F., Eight EU states back ‘natural gas’ in net-zero transition, “Euractiv” [online], 22 V 2020 [accessed: 25 V 2020], available at: <https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/exclusive-eight-eu-states-back-natural-gas-in-net-zero-transition/>.
Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Data Envelopment Analysis for Environmental Assessment: Comparison between Public and Private Ownership in Petroleum Industry, “European Journal of Operational Research” 2012, vol. 216, No. 3.
Vakulchuk R., Overland I., Scholten D., Renewable Energy and Geopolitics: A Review, “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews” 2020, vol. 122: 109547.
Zhong M., Bazilian M. D., Contours of the Energy Transition: Investment by International Oil and Gas Companies in Renewable Energy, “The Electricity Journal” 2018, vol. 31, No. 1.
Florence School of Regulation, Queen Mary University of London, School of Engineering and Materials Science Włochy
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-3210
Ten utwór jest dostępny na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
