Hongkong AD 2019. Przyczyny i kierunki rozwoju protestów w Specjalnym Regionie Administracyjnym ChRL
Abstrakt
Civil disobedience flooded Hong Kong in 2019. However, protests have changed its character since the last massive demonstrations in 2014. This article outlines direct and contextual reasons for the outbreak of protests in Hong Kong in 2019 from the perspective of Bert Klandermans’s model. The aim of the research is also to indicate the directions of protests in this Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. The findings presented are the result of the author’s field work carried out since 2012. It should be emphasised that the protests in Hong Kong are the result of the progressive mainlandisation of the region, and in the deeper layer – of the socio-economic problems of citizens. The protests in 2019 brought a change in the tactics of manifesting civil disobedience.
Słowa kluczowe
Hongkong; protesty; rewolucja parasolkowa; Chiny; ChRL; sinizacja polityczna; Specjalny Region Administracyjny Hongkong
Bibliografia
Cheng J. Y., The emergence of radical politics in Hong Kong: Causes and impact, „China Review” 2014, vol. 14, No. 1.
Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong. Localism after the umbrella movement, ed. W.-M. Lam, L. Cooper, Routledge, New York 2018.
Contemporary Hong Kong politics. Governance in the post-1997 era, ed. W. Lam, P. L. Lui, W. W. H. Wong, I. Holiday, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong 2007, Kindle e-book.
Ghai Y., Hong Kong’s new constitutional order. The resumption of Chinese sovereignty and the basic law, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong 1999, Kindle e-book.
Klandermans B., Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory, „American Sociological Review” 1984, vol. 49.
Klandermans B., The social psychology of protest, Blackwell, Oxford 1997.
Klandermans B., A theoretical framework for comparisons of social movement participation, „Sociological Forum” 1993, vol. 8, issue 3.
Lai C., DeGolyer M. E., Asian urban-wellbeing indicators comparative report: Hong Kong, Singapore, Shanghai, Civic Exchange, June 2016.
Lee F. L. F., Tang G., Yuen S., Cheng E. W., Onsite survey findings in Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill protests. Research report, Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, August 2019.
Ma N., Political development in Hong Kong. State, political society, and civil society, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong 2007, Kindle e-book.
Ma N., Political parties and elections, [w:] Contemporary Hong Kong politics. Governance in the post-1997 era, ed. W. Lam, P. L. Lui, W. W. H. Wong, I. Holiday, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong 2007, Kindle e-book.
Purbrick M., A report of the 2019 Hong Kong protests, „Asian Affairs” 2019, vol. 50, issue 4, DOI: 10.1080/03068374.2019.1672397.
Sautman B., Yan H., Localists and „locusts” in Hong Kong: Creating a yellow-red peril discourse, University of Maryland, 2015 (Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2).
Sing M., Hong Kong’s tortuous democratization. A comparative analysis, Routledge, London–New York 2004, Kindle e-book.
Social mobility in Hong Kong: January 2015, Legislative Council, 2015 (Research Brief, 2), dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 1 II 2016]: <http://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/1415rb02-social-mobility-in-hong-kong-20150112-e.pdf>.
Stekelenburg J. van, Klandermans B., Fitting demand and supply: How identification brings appeals and motives together, „Social Movement Studies” 2014, vol. 13, No. 2.
Stekelenburg J. van, Klandermans B., The social psychology of protest, „Current Sociology” 2013, vol. 61, issue 5−6.
Wu X., Income inequality and distributive justice: A comparative analysis of mainland China and Hong Kong, „The China Quarterly” 2009, No. 200.
Zamęcki Ł., Rewolucja parasolkowa w Hongkongu. Przyczyny, przebieg, następstwa, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2018.
Zamęcki Ł., Sinizacja systemu politycznego Hongkongu, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2019.
Zomeren M. van, Postmes T., Spears R., Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives, „Psychological Bulletin” 2008, vol. 134, issue 4.
Ten utwór jest dostępny na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
