For Reviewers
Review Process
The Review Process complies with the recommendations by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education as published by the Ethics in Science Committee in a study “Good Practices in Review Procedures in Science”, Warsaw 2011.
Crucial Review Procedure Principles:
1. by submitting a text for publication, Author(s) agree the manuscript be subject to the review procedure;
2. texts are subject to Editorial screening;
3. manuscripts are reviewed by competent and reliable experts;
4. the review procedure is confidential and anonymous, which is guaranteed by a double-blind review, that is neither do the reviewers know the Author’s identity nor does the Author know the Reviewer's identity;
5. reviews are conducted by two external, that is not employed in the institution publishing the journal, experts;
6. the Reviewers shall have an affiliation other than the affiliation of the Author and there shall be no conflict of interest between the Author(s) and Reviewer(s);
7. reviewers must not use knowledge about the content of the article before its publication;
8. the Author makes all the necessary corrections according to the Reviewer's comments;
9. following the revisions, the Reviewer once again reviews the manuscript;
10. any communication between the Author and the Reviewer is conducted by the Editors.