For Reviewers
Review Process
The Review Process complies with the recommendations by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education as published by the Ethics in Science Committee in a study “Good Practices in Review Procedures in Science”, Warsaw 2011.
Crucial Review Procedure Principles:
- By submitting a text for publication, Author(s) agree the manuscript be subject to the review procedure;
- Texts are subject to Editorial screening;
- Manuscripts are reviewed by competent and reliable experts;
- The review procedure is confidential and anonymous, which is guaranteed by a double-blind review, that is neither do the reviewers know the Author’s identity nor does the Author know the Reviewer's identity;
- Reviews are conducted by two external, that is not employed in the institution publishing the journal, experts;
- The Reviewers shall have an affiliation other than the affiliation of the Author and there shall be no conflict of interest between the Author(s) and Reviewer(s);
- Reviewers must not use knowledge about the content of the article before its publication;
- The Author makes all the necessary corrections according to the Reviewer's comments;
- Following the revisions, the Reviewer once again reviews the manuscript;
- Any communication between the Author and the Reviewer is conducted by the Editors.