Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Tom 25 (2019): GEOPOLITYKA, PRZESTRZEŃ, WŁASNOŚĆ

Temat numeru

The Globalisation of Peripheries

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2019.25.03
Przesłane: 16 kwietnia 2020
Opublikowane: 30 grudnia 2019

Abstrakt

The author attempts to investigate connections and interdependencies between periphery countries and the globalisation process, including the attitude of these countries to unification blocs, such as the European integration project. The basic research tool used in this work is a systemic analysis, as well as the core-periphery method, derived from social sciences. Its fundamental hypothesis is that the decline of the liberal architecture of the globe may translate into the periphery’s tendency to abandon real convergence in favour of the fragmentary imitation of supranational bodies, potentially leading to intensified disintegration tendencies within phenomena, such as the consolidation of Europe. In the past, the powerless core of the community only contemplated the imitative Europeanisation of marginal territories. Today, however – because the idea to construct a homogeneous polity has collapsed – postulates of “multi-speed” integration can lead to the reconstruction of the historical division into the core and periphery of the old continent.

Bibliografia

  1. Bauman Z., Legislators and Interpreters. On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
  2. Börzel T.A., “When Europeanization Hits Limited Statehood. The Western Balkans as a Test Case for the Transformative Power of Europe”, KFG Working Paper Series, September 2011, No. 30.
  3. Börzel T.A., Risse T., “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe”, in: K. Featherstone, C.M. Radaelli, The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  4. Copcea B., “Integration and Inequalities in the Eastern European Countries”, Annals of’ Constantin Brancusi University of Targu-Jiu. Economy Series, 2015, vol. 4.
  5. Epstein R.A., Jacoby W., “Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending East-West Divide”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2014, vol. 52 (1).
  6. Krasnodębski Z., Demokracja peryferii (Democracy of peripheries), Gdańsk: słowo/obraz terytoria, 2003, p. 84.
  7. Krastev I. Holmes S., “Explaining Eastern Europe: Imitation and Its Discontents”, Journal of Democracy, July 2018, http://www.journalofdemocracy.org/article/explaining-eastern-europe-imitation-and-its-discontents
  8. Magier M., ”Tożsamość peryferyjna. Tożsamość centrystyczna. Lokalne i globalne kłopoty z tożsamością” (Peripheral identity. Centrist identity. Local and global identity problems), Przegląd Politologiczny, 2012, No. 1.
  9. Matyja R., Peryferyjność – wyzwanie czy fatum? (Peripherality – challenge or fate?), Kraków: Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej, http://www.omp.org.pl/artykul.php?artykul=330
  10. Niedźwiecki A., Exploring the European Constitutional Sphere. Centre-Periphery Perspective, in: Europe in the Time of Crisis, ed. by S. Konopacki, Łódź – Kraków: Uniwersytet Łódzki, 2014.
  11. Plechanovová B., “The EU Council Enlarged: North-South-East or Core-Periphery?”, European Union Politics, 2011, vol. 12 (1).
  12. [De] Santis R., Cesaroni T., “Current Account «Core-Periphery Dualism» in the EMU“, World Economy, 2016, vol. 39 (10).
  13. Sedelmeier U., “Europeanisation in New Member and Candidate States”, Living Reviews in European Governance, 2011, vol. 6, No. 1.
  14. Thomas B.C., “Core-Periphery Relations in the European Union and the Role of Central Places in Europe with a Focus on Regional Policy in Britain and Germany”, European Review, 2013, vol. 21 (3).
  15. Vachudova M.A., “EU Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans. The Puzzles of Enlargement Ten Years On”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2014, vol. 52 (1).
  16. Wallerstein I., The Modern World System. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Academic Press, 1974.
  17. Wallerstein I., World-systems Analysis. An Introduction, Durham – London: Duke University Press, 2004.
  18. Zarycki T., “Politics in the Periphery. The Interpretation of Political Cleavages in Poland in Their Historical and International Context”, Europe-Asia Studies, 2000, vol. 52, No. 5.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.