Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 22 (2018): Crisis

Temat numeru

„Crisis” in Contemporary History and Historiography

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2018.22.02
Submitted: February 21, 2020
Published: May 30, 2018

Abstract

While crises are omnipresent in history and historiography, the meaning of the concept of ‘crisis’ is becoming more elusive than ever. The authors scrutinise how historians use this concept with respect to contemporary history, the twentieth century and modernity in general. After briefly sketching the conceptual history of ‘crisis,’ the article addresses the questions of how the concept structures historiographical narratives, what types of crises historians distinguish, and whether we should retain the concept or refrain from using it, considering its vagueness, suggestive power and political instrumentalisation.

References

  1. Graf R., Jarausch K.H., „Crisis” in Contemporary History and Historiography, wersja 1.0, Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte, 27 marca 2017, http://docupedia.de/zg/Graf_jarausch_crisis_en_2017?oldid=127998.
  2. Grunwald H. (red.), Krisis! Krisenszenarien, Diagnosen und Diskursstrategien, Fink Verlag, Paderborn – München 2006.
  3. Koselleck R., Krise, w: Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, t. 3: H–Me, Klett-Cotta Verlag, Stuttgart 1982.
  4. Mergel T. (red.), Krisen verstehen. Historische und kulturwissenschaftliche Annäherungen, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/M 2012.
  5. Meyer C., Patzel-Mattern K., Schenk Gerrit J. (red.), Krisengeschichte(n). „Krise” als Leitbegriff und Erzählmuster in kulturwissenschaftlicher Perspektive, Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2013.
  6. Plumpe W., Wirtschaftskrisen. Geschichte und Gegenwart, C.H. Beck Verlag, München 2010.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.