Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Tom 52 Nr 2 (2024)

Integracja europejska/Unia Europejska

Wpływ polaryzacji na krajowej scenie partyjnej na spójność głosowań polskiej delegacji narodowej w Parlamencie Europejskim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2024.52.2.01
Przesłane: 27 lutego 2025
Opublikowane: 21 czerwca 2024

Abstrakt

The aim of this article is to determine whether and to what extent political polarisation on the domestic party scene determines the ability of the Polish national delegation in the European Parliament (EP) to shape voting patterns. This problem is presented using the example of Poland. The approach presented in this article is original and scientifically significant. First, previous analyses of the implications of political polarisation are usually limited to presenting them in relation to the political system of a given country. Second, research on the coherence of voting in the EP is mostly devoted to political groups, i.e. the relevant actors, who are responsible for stimulating political processes in the EP. The presented approach is not reflected in existing studies on either polarisation or the EP, thus constituting a new research proposal. It has been proven that the catalogue of determinants conditioning the coherence of votes should include political polarisation. The study shows that there is a negative correlation between the variables, which means that an increase in the level of polarisation is associated with a decrease in the coherence of votes of the Polish delegation in the EP. And vice versa – a decrease in polarisation at the national level is accompanied by an increase in the ability of the Polish representation in the EP to reach agreements beyond factions. The presented findings undoubtedly require further verification on a wider set of EU countries.

Bibliografia

  • Abramson P.A., R. Inglehart, Generational Replacement and Value Change in Six West European Societies, „American Journal of Political Science” 1986, t. 30, nr 1, s. 1–25, DOI: 10.2307/2111292.
  • Andrews D. M., Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations, „International Studies Quarterly” 1994, t. 38, nr 2, s. 193–218, DOI: 10.2307/2600975.
  • Antoszewski A., Wzorce rywalizacji politycznej we współczesnych demokracjach europejskich, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2004.
  • Autor D., D. Dorn, G. Hanson, K. Majlesi, Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure, „American Economic Review” 2020, t. 110, nr 10, s. 3139–3183, DOI: 10.1257/aer.20170011.
  • Barcz J., A. Grzelak i R. Szyndlauer, Problem praworządności w Polsce w świetle dokumentów Komisji Europejskiej. Okres „dialogu politycznego” 2016–2017, Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA, Warszawa 2020.
  • Bernabel R., Does the Electoral Rule Matter for Political Polarization? The Case of Brazilian Legislative Chambers, „Brazilian Political Science Review” 2015, t. 9, nr 2, s. 81–108, DOI: 10.1590/1981-38212014000200012.
  • Born R., Ch. Nevison, The „Agreement Level” Measure, and the Rice Index of Cohesion Revisited, „American Journal of Political Science” 1974, t. 18, nr 3, s. 617–624, DOI: 10.2307/2110636.
  • Bowler S., McElroy G., Political Group Cohesion and ‘Hurrah’ Voting in the European Parliament, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2015, t. 22, nr 9, s. 1355–1365, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1048704.
  • Callander S., Carbajal J.C., Cause and Effect in Political Polarization: A Dynamic Analysis, „Journal of Political Economy” 2022, t. 130, nr 4, s. 825–880, DOI: 10.1086/718200.
  • Cerney P.G., Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization, „Government and Opposition” 1997, t. 32, nr 2, s. 251–274, DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00161.x.
  • Cichi L., The Logic of Voting Behaviour in the European Parliament: New In-sights on Party Group Membership and National Affiliation as Determinants of Vote, IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, Lucca 2013.
  • Czornik K., Problematyka uchodźców (migrantów) z Bliskiego Wschodu i Afryki Północnej w kampanii parlamentarnej z 2015 roku. Analiza stanowisk, [w:] Polskie wybory 2015: kontekst krajowy i międzynarodowy – przebieg rywalizacji – konsekwencje polityczne, t. 2, red. M. Kolczyński, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice 2017, s. 157–177.
  • Dalton R.J., The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and its Consequences, „Comparative Political Studies” 2008, t. 41, nr 7, s. 899–920, DOI: 10.1177/0010414008315860.
  • Ellis Ch.R., Ura J.D., Polarization and the Decline of Economic Voting in American National Elections, „Social Science Quarterly” 2021, t. 102, nr 1, s. 83–89, DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12881.
  • Frieden J., International Cooperation in the Age of Populism, [w:] Economic Globalization and Governance: essays in Honor of Jorge Braga de Macedo, red. L. Brites Pereira i in., Springer Nature, Cham 2021, s. 303–314.
  • Garand J.C., Income Inequality, Party Polarization, and Roll-call Voting in the U.S. Senate, „The Journal of Politics” 2010, t. 72, nr 4, s. 1109–1128, DOI: 10.1017/S0022381610000563.
  • Garrett G., Mitchell D., Globalization, Government Spending, and Taxation in the OECD, „European Journal of Political Research” 2001, t. 39, nr 2, s. 145–177, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00573.
  • Hefeker C., Neugart M., Political Polarization and International Cooperation, „European Journal of Political Economy” 2023, t. 78, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4160645.
  • Hix S., Legislative Behaviour and Party Competition in the European Parliament: An Application of Nominate to the EU, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2001, t. 39, nr, 4, s. 663–688, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00326.
  • Hix S., Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Legislator Preferences, Parties and Voting in the European Parliament, „American Journal of Political Science” 2002, t. 46, nr 3, s. 688–698.
  • Hix S., A.G. Noury, G. Roland, Power to the Parties. Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979-2001, „British Journal of Political Science” 2005, t. 35, nr 2, s. 209–234, DOI: 10.1017/S0007123405000128.
  • Hix S., A. Noury, G. Roland, A ‘Normal’ Parliament? Party Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001, „EPRG Working Paper” 2002, nr 9.
  • Horonziak S., Dysfunctional Democracy and Political Polarisation: The Case of Poland, „Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft” 2022, nr 16, s. 265–289, DOI: 10.1007/s12286-022-00536-6.
  • Inglehart R., The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-industrial Societies, „The American Political Science Review” 1971, nr 65, nr 4, s. 991–1017, DOI: 10.2307/1953494.
  • Jackson P.T., The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, Routledge, New York 2011.
  • Jones D., Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock, „Political Research Quarterly” 2001, t. 54, nr 1, s. 125–141, DOI: 10.2307/449211.
  • Kang Y.D., European Affiliations or National Interests? Analyses of Voting Patterns on Trade Policy in European Parliament, „Baltic Journal of European Studies” 2019, t. 9, nr 4, s. 19–48, DOI: 10.1515/bjes2019-0036y.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.