Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
SP baner

Tom 46 Nr 1 (2018)

Myśl polityczna

Ewikcjonizm i zasada ubi jus ibi remedium. Problem aborcji w filozofii politycznej libertarianizmu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2018.46.1.10
Przesłane: 30 kwietnia 2025
Opublikowane: 20 marca 2018

Abstrakt

The article deals with the problem of permissibility of abortion from the libertarian point of view. It employs Block’s theory of evictionism and Hohfeld’s analysis of normative relations to demonstrate that, according to libertarianism, there is a natural right to kill the late foetus, provided that the foetus violates the mother’s property rights and killing it complies with the proportionality-gentleness principle. It is also shown that the proportionality principle in self-defence, contrary to the proportionality principle in retribution and restitution, must be interpreted as the gentleness principle (Block) in pain of violating the principle of ubi jus ibi remedium (no right without a remedy) and the law of non-contradiction. Notwithstanding the above, killing the foetus is not the ‘gentlest manner possible’ (Block) of stopping the violation of a mother’s property rights at the current stage of development of medical science. Therefore, a mother is only permitted to evict the foetus in a non-lethal way.

Bibliografia

  • Anand K.J.S., Hickey P.R., Pain and Its Effects in the Human Neonate and Fetus, „The New England Journal of Medicine”, t. 317, nr 21, s. 1322.
  • Barnett R.E., Restitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice, „Ethics” 1977, t. 87, nr 4, s. 279–301.
  • Barnett R.E., The Structure of Liberty, Oxford University Press, New York 2000, s. 12–17.
  • Block W.E., Whitehead R., Compromising the Uncompromisable: A Private Property Rights Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy, „Appalachian Law Review” 2005, t. 4, nr 1, s. 1–45.
  • Block W.E., Toward a Libertarian Theory of Abortion, „The Libertarian Forum” 1977, t. 10, nr 9, s. 6–8.
  • Block W.E., Abortion, Woman and Fetus: Rights in Conflict? „Reason”, April 1978, s. 18–25.
  • Block W.E., L’Aborto: Una Legittima Difesa, „Claustrofobia” 1997, nr 3, s. 16–22.
  • Block W.E., Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Two, „Libertarian Papers” 2011, t. 3, nr 4, s. 3–4.
  • Block W.E., Toward a Libertarian Theory of Evictionism, „Journal of Family and Economic Issues” 2013, t. 35, nr 2, s. 290–294.
  • Block W.E., Evictionism and Libertarianism, „Journal of Medicine and Philosophy” 2014, t. 35, nr 2, s. 290–294.
  • Block W.E., Should Abortion Be Criminalized? Rejoinder to Akers, Davies and Shaffer on Abortion, „Management, Education, Science, Information & Industrial Technology (MEST) Journal” 2014, t. 2, nr 1, s. 33–44.
  • Evers W.M., Toward a Reformulation of the Law of Contracts, „Journal of Libertarian Studies” 1977, t. 1, nr 1, s. 3–13.
  • Evers W.M., The Law of Omissions and Neglect of Children, „Journal of Libertarian Papers” 1978, t. 2, nr 1, s. 3–5.
  • Finnis J., Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford University Press, New York, 2011, s. 199–200.
  • Føllesdal D., Hilpinen R., Deontic Logic: An Introduction, [w:] Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, ed. R. Hilpinen, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht 1981, s. 9.
  • Haldane J.B.S., Daedalus or Science and the Future. A Paper Read to the Heretics, Cambridge 1923, [w:] J.B.S. Haldane, Daedalus Revisited, ed. K.R. Dronamraju, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995.
  • Hilpinen R. (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht 1981.
  • Hohfeld W.N., Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, „The Yale Law Journal” 1913, t. 23, nr 1, s. 16–59.
  • Hohfeld W.N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, „Faculty Scholarship Series” 1917, art. 4378, s. 710–770.
  • Kinsella S., New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory, „Journal of Libertarian Studies” 1996, t. 12, nr 2, s. 319–320.
  • Kinsella S., A Libertarian Theory of Punishment and Rights, „Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review” 1997, t. 30, nr 2, s. 631–641.
  • McMahan J., The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life, Oxford University Press, New York 2002, s. 13, 269.
  • New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics, ed. R. Hilpinen, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht 1981.
  • Parfit D., Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987, s. 351–379.
  • Rothbard M., The Ethics of Liberty, New York University Press, New York 2002, s. 80–81, 98.
  • Steiner H., An Essay on Rights, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford 1994, s. 2–3, 89.
  • Thomson J.J., A Defence of Abortion, [w:] Bioethics, ed. J. Harris, Oxford University Press, New York 2004, s. 25–41.
  • von Wright G.H., Deontic Logic, „Mind” 1951, t. 60, nr 237.
  • Wiśniewski J.B., A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment, „Libertarian Papers” 2010, t. 2, nr 16, s. 2–4.
  • Wiśniewski J.B., Rejoinder to Block’s Defense of Evictionism, „Libertarian Papers” 2010, t. 2, nr 37, s. 2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.