Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 54 No. 3 (2026): Political Imagination

Research Articles

Coarticulation: Mutual Transformation in Human and Nonhuman Relations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2026.54.3.06
Submitted: March 25, 2026
Published: September 30, 2026

Abstract

“Representation” and “articulation” are important terms in discussions of multispecies relations. In this paper, I propose the term “coarticulation” that describes a process of mutual intelligibility between a human and a nonhuman and of rendering each other capable in new ways. This article argues that the concept of “coarticulation” offers a way to enrich our understanding of our human-nonhuman relations and to give ontological consistency to various types of nonhumans that matter to us. It traces the reciprocal imprints that nonhumans and humans make on each other. Not least, it provides an alternative way to think about politics with nonhumans: a politics of cohabitation. This article engages closely with Vinciane Despret’s work.

References

  • Anker, E. S., & Felski, R. (Red.). (2017). Critique and Postcritique. Duke University Press.
  • Beck, U. (2004). The Truth of Others: A Cosmopolitan Approach. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 430–449.
  • Buchanan, B. et al. (2015). On Asking the Right Questions. An Interview with Vinciane Despret. Angelaki, 20(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1039821.
  • Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Corrigan, D. P., & Oksanen, M. (Red.). (2021). Rights of Nature: A Re-Examination. Routledge.
  • Cyceron. (1960). Mowy wybrane (J. Mrukówna, D. Turkowska, & S. Kołodziejczyk, Tłum.). Czytelnik.
  • Despret, V. (2004a). Hans, le cheval qui savait compter. Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/Le Seuil.
  • Despret, V. (2004b). The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042938.
  • Despret, V. (2009). Penser comme un rat. Éditions Quæ.
  • Despret, V. (2015a). Au bonheur des morts. Récits de ceux qui restent. Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/La Découverte. (Wydanie polskie: V. Despret [2021]. Wszystko dla naszych zmarłych [U. Kropiwiec, Tłum.]. Karakter.)
  • Despret, V. (2015b). Why I Had Not Read Derrida: Often Too Close, Always Too Far Away. W S. Posthumus & L. MacKenzie (Red.), French Thinking About Animals (s. 91–104). Michigan State University Press.
  • Despret, V. (2018). The Becomings of Subjectivity in Animal Worlds. Subjectivity, 23, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.15.
  • Despret, V. (2019). Habiter en oiseau. Actes Sud.
  • Despret, V. (2020). Quand le loup habitera avec l’agneau. Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/La Découverte. (Pierwotnie opublikowane w 2002 r.).
  • Despret, V. (2021). Autobiographie d’un poulpe et autres récits d’anticipation. Actes Sud.
  • Despret, V. (2023). Les morts à l’œuvre. Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/La Découverte.
  • Despret, V., & Dolphijn, F. (2021). Fabriquer des mondes habitables. Esperluète Éditions.
  • Despret, V., & Stengers, I. (2011). Les faiseuses d’histoires. Que font les femmes à la pensée? Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond/La Découverte.
  • Drałus, D. (2018). Kręgi przynależności. Przyczynek do dziejów kosmopolityki. Studia Krytyczne, 6, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.279.
  • Gordon, U. (2008). Anarchy Alive! Anti-Authoritarian Politics from Practice to Theory. Pluto Press.
  • Haraway, D. (1989). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Routledge.
  • Haraway, D. (2004). The Promises of Monsters. A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. W The Haraway Reader (s. 63–124). Routledge.
  • Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Harvey, D. (2000). Cosmopolitanism and the Banality of Geographic Evils. Public Culture, 12(2), 529–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822380184-013.
  • Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and Geographies of Freedom. Columbia University Press.
  • Janicka, I. (2017). Theorizing Contemporary Anarchism: Solidarity, Mimesis and Radical Social Change. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Janicka, I. (2020). Who Can Speak? Rancière, Latour and the Question of Articulation. Humanities, 9(4), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040123.
  • Janicka, I. (2023). Reinventing the Diplomat: Isabelle Stengers, Bruno Latour and Baptiste Morizot. Theory, Culture & Society, 40(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221146717.
  • Janicka, I. (2024a). Coarticulation: Mutual Transformation in Human and Nonhuman Relations. SubStance, 53(2), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2024.a934261.
  • Janicka, I. (2024b). The Janus Face of Cosmopolitics: The Concept of Universality in Isabelle Stengers and Bruno Latour. Philosophy Today, 68(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2024125518.
  • Jóhannsson, J. (Reż.). (2020). Last and First Men [Film]. Zak Zak Filmworks; Icelandic Film Centre.
  • Kant, I. (1995). Zum ewigen Frieden (O. Höffe, Red.). Akademie Verlag. (Wydanie polskie: I. Kant [1995]. Do wiecznego pokoju. Projekt filozoficzny [M. Żelazny, Tłum.]. Wydawnictwo Comer).
  • Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. (2021). The Politics of Rights of Nature: Strategies for Building a More Sustainable Future. The MIT Press.
  • Kinna, R. (2019). The Government of No One: The Theory and Practice of Anarchism. Pelican.
  • Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Éditions La Découverte. (Wydanie polskie: B. Latour [2011]. Nigdy nie byliśmy nowocześni [M. Gdula, Tłum.]. Oficyna Naukowa).
  • Latour, B. (1993). Aramis, ou l’amour des techniques. Éditions La Découverte.
  • Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Latour, B. (2006). Des sujets récalcitrants. W Chroniques d’un amateur de sciences (s. 187–189). Presses des Mines. (Pierwotnie opublikowane w 1997 r.).
  • Latour, B. (2012). Enquête sur les modes d’existence. Une anthropologie des modernes. Éditons La Découverte.
  • MacAskill, W. (2022). What We Owe the Future: A Million-Year View. Oneworld Publications.
  • Marder, M. (2026). Of Joints and Other Articulations: The Futures of Arthrosophy. Northwestern University Press.
  • Mitek-Dziemba, A. (2019). Kosmopolityzm jako praktyka międzygatunkowa. Parę uwag o gościnności nieantropocentrycznej. Etyka, 58(1), 76–96.
  • Milstein, C. (2010). Anarchism and its Aspirations. AK Press.
  • Morizot, B. (2019). Les diplomates: cohabiter avec les loups sur une autre carte du vivant. Wildproject.
  • Morizot, B. (2020). Manières d’être vivant: enquêtes sur la vie à travers nous. Actes Sud.
  • Rautio, P. (2013). Being Nature: Interspecies Articulation as a Species-Specific Practice of Relating to Environment. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.700698.
  • Rose, D. B. (2012). Cosmopolitics: The Kiss of Life. New Formations, 76, 101–13. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.76.07.2012.
  • Savransky, M. (2014). Of Recalcitrant Subjects. Culture, Theory & Critique, 55(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2013.821767.
  • Seneka. (1961). Listy moralne do Lucyliusza, (W. Kornatowski, Tłum.). Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Simondon, G. (1989). L’Individuation psychique et collective: à la lumière des notions de forme, information, potentiel et métastabilité. Aubier. (Pierwotnie opublikowane w 1964 r.).
  • Spivak, G. C. (2003). Death of a Discipline. Columbia University Press.
  • Stengers, I. (1993). L’Invention des sciences modernes, Éditions La Découverte.
  • Stengers, I. (2005). The Cosmopolitical Proposal. W B. Latour & P. Weibel (Red.), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (s. 994–1003). MIT Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I (R. Bononno, Tłum.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Stengers, I. (2011). Cosmopolitics II (R. Bononno, Tłum.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Van Dooren, T. & Rose, D. B. (2016). Lively Ethnography: Storying Animist Worlds. Environmental Humanities, 8(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527731.
  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2015). The Relative Native. Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Hau Books.
  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2017). Cannibal Metaphysics. For a Post-Structural Anthropology (P. Skafish, Tłum. i Red.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Von Uexküll, J. (2014). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Springer Spektrum. (Pierwotnie opublikowane w 1909 r.).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.