Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Civitas baner

Vol. 24 (2019): Polish Philosophy: Between Local and Universal

Temat numeru

The Polish Context of the History of Ukrainian Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2019.24.03
Submitted: December 15, 2019
Published: June 28, 2019

Abstract

The article analyses problems in the historiography of Ukrainian philosophy that emerge when the object of the research is institutions, currents of thought and persons, already included into the canon of Ukrainian philosophy. Objective investigation of them, nevertheless, is impossible if the Polish context is not considered. This context is formed by “the common sphere” of Polish and Ukrainian history. It includes such important for both nations figures and institutions as Stanislav Orikhovskyi, Kyiv-Mohyla Academy and the Lviv-Warsaw School. The author believes that research into the Polish context in the history of Ukrainian philosophy demands the revision of the inherited views on the Ukrainian identity. The proposed conception is able reject the view that the national philosophical tradition is a self-sufficient and original product of the national culture.

References

  1. Čiževs′kij D., Narisi z ìstorìї fìlosofìї na Ukraїnì, w: D. Čiževs′kij, Fìlosofs′kì tvori, t. 1, red. V. Lìsovij, Smoloskip, Kiїv 2005.
  2. Crépon M., Altérités de l’Europe, Galilée, Paris 2006.
  3. Evaroŭskì V., Nacyânal′naâ fìlosofìâ Belarusì: tèoryâ, arheologìâ, gìstoryâ, genealogìâ, škola, Belaruskaâ navuka, Mìnsk 2014.
  4. Gors′kij V., Ukraїns′ko-pol′s′ka „sfera spìl′nostì” ta її značennâ dlâ ìstorìї ukraїns′koї fìlosofìї, w: V. Gors′kij, Fìlosofìâ v ukraїns′kìj kul′turì (metodologìâ ta ìstorìâ), Centr praktičnoї fìlosofìї, Kiїv 2001.
  5. Ivanyk S., Filozofowie ukraińscy w Szkole Lwowsko-Warszawskiej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Semper”, Warszawa 2014.
  6. Josipenko S., Vdovina O., Simčič M., Ìstorìâ fìlosofìї Ukraїni âk galuz′ naukovogo doslìdžennâ ì akademìčna disciplìna v 1950–2000 rokah, „Sententiae” 2011, nr 2.
  7. Litvinov V. (red.), Ukraїns′kì gumanìsti epohi Vìdrodžennâ. Antologìâ, č. 1–2, pereklad V. Litvinova, Naukova dumka / Osnovi, Kiїv 1995.
  8. Litvinov V., «Katolic′ka rus′» (Vnesok ukraїncìv katolic′kogo vìrospovìdannâ v duhovnu kul′turu Ukraїni XVI st.). Ìstoriko-fìlosofs′kij naris, Ukraїns′kij Centr duhovnoї kul′turi, Kiїv 2005.
  9. Litvinov V., Renesansnij gumanìzm v Ukraїnì (Ìdeї gumanìzmu epohi Vìdrodžennâ v ukraїns′kìj fìlosofìї XV – počatku XVII st.), Kiїv 2000.
  10. Litvinov V., Stanìslav Orìhovs′kij. Ìstoriko-fìlosofs′kij portret, Akademperìodika, Kiїv 2014.
  11. Łużny R., Pisarze kręgu Akademii Kijowsko-Mohylańskiej a literatura polska. Z dziejów związków kulturalnych polsko-wschodniosłowiańskich w XVII–XVIII w., Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 1966.
  12. Nìčik V., Kiêvo-Mogilâns′ka akademìâ ì nìmec′ka kul′tura, Ukraїns′kij Centr duhovnoї kul′turi, Kiїv 2001.
  13. Romanowski A., Literatura polsko-rusko-rosyjska?, „Wielogłos. Pismo Wydziału Polonistyki UJ” 2016, nr 2 (28).
  14. Rudenko S., Yosypenko S., National philosophy as a subject of comparative research, „Sententiae” 2018, nr 37 (1).
  15. Wąsik W., Historia filozofii polskiej, t. 1: Scholastyka, Renesans, Oświecenie, Instytut Wydawniczy „Pax”, Warszawa 1958.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.