Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
KiS baner

Tom 59 Nr 1 (2015): CZYTAJĄC ELIASA

Artykuły i rozprawy

Doświadczenie ojcostwa a znaturalizowany porządek płciowy w Eliasowskiej perspektywie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2015.59.1.8
Przesłane: 30 kwietnia 2021
Opublikowane: 10 lutego 2015

Abstrakt

This article focuses on the relations between men and women in the area of family life, and in particular the situation of fathers and their approach to biological differences between the genders. Using the theoretical perspective developed by Norbert Elias, the author shows how the organization of social life, which she considers to be based on the inequality of men and women, is legitimized by emphasis in the process of naturalizing gender differences. On the basis of qualitative research, methods of defining fatherhood in reference to that difference are depicted, as are the strategies which individuals adopt to deal with it, and the problems that are connected with this in contemporary Polish society.

Bibliografia

  1. Badinter Elisabeth, 1998, Historia miłości macierzyńskiej, tłum. Krzysztof Choiński, Volumen, Warszawa.
  2. Badinter Elisabeth, 2013, Konflikt: kobieta i matka, tłum. Jakub Jedliński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  3. Bales Robert F., Parsons Talcott (red.), 1955, Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.
  4. Benaquisto Lucia, 2008, Code and Coding, w: Lisa M. Given (red.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
  5. Brinkgreve Christien, 2004, Elias on Gender Relations: The Changing Balance of Power between the Sexes, w: Steven Loyal, Steven Quilley (red.), The Sociology of Norbert Elias, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK–New York.
  6. Bryan Derrick M., 2013, To Parent or Provide? The Effect of the Provider Role on Low-Income Men’s Decisions about Fatherhood and Paternal Engagement, „Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers”, t. 11(1), s. 71–89.
  7. Budrowska Bogusława, Duch-Krzystoszek Danuta, Titkow Anna (red.), 2003, Szklany sufit: bariery i ograniczenia karier kobiet. Monografia zjawiska, Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Warszawa.
  8. Budrowska Bogusława, Duch-Krzystoszek Danuta, Titkow Anna, 2004, Nieodpłatna praca kobiet: mity, realia, perspektywy, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
  9. Bucholc Marta, 2013, Samotność długodystansowca. Na obrzeżach socjologii Norberta Eliasa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  10. Burghes Louise, Clarke Lynda, Cronin Natalie, 1997, Fathers and Fatherhood in Britain, Family Policy Studies Centre, London.
  11. Chesley Noelle, 2011, Stay-at-home Fathers and Breadwinning Mothers: Gender, Couple Dynamics, and Social Change, „Gender and Society”, t. 25(5), s. 642–664.
  12. Clegg Stewart, Boreham Paul, Dow Geoff, 1986, Class, Politics, and the Economy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  13. Coltrane Scott, Collins Randall, 2001, Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love, and Property, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.
  14. Connell R. W., 1987, Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Cal.
  15. Connell R. W., 2005, Masculinities, University of California Press, Berkeley (2 wyd.).
  16. Domański Henryk, 2002, Polska klasa średnia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
  17. Dotti Sani Giulia Maria, 2014, Men’s Employment Hours and Time on Domestic Chores in European Countries, „Journal of Family Issues” t. 35(8), s. 1023–1047.
  18. Doucet Andrea, Merla Laura, 2007, Stay-at-home Fathering: A Strategy for Balancing Work and Home in Canadian and Belgian Families, „Community, Work and Family”, t. 10(4), s. 455–473.
  19. Dowd Nancy E., 2000, Redefining Fatherhood, New York University Press, New York.
  20. Dribe Martin, Stanfors Maria, 2009, Does Parenthood Strengthen a Traditional Household Division of Labor? Evidence from Sweden, „Journal of Marriage and Family”, t. 71(1), s. 33–45.
  21. Duch-Krzystoszek Danuta, 2007, Kto rządzi w rodzinie: socjologiczna analiza relacji w małżeństwie, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
  22. Dunn Marianne G., Rochlen Aaron B., O’Brien Karen M., 2013, Employee, Mother, and Partner: An Exploratory Investigation of Working Women with Stay-at-home Fathers, „Journal of Career Development”, t. 40(1), s. 3–22.
  23. Elias Norbert, 1987, The Changing Balance of Power between the Sexes — A Process-Sociological Study: The Example of the Ancient Roman State, „Theory, Culture and Society”, t. 4(2), s. 287–316.
  24. Elias Norbert, 1994, Reflections on a Life, Cambridge Polity Press, Cambridge.
  25. Elias Norbert, 2003, Zaangażowanie i neutralność, tłum. Janusz Stawiński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  26. Elias Norbert, 2008, Społeczeństwo jednostek, tłum. Janusz Stawiński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  27. Elias Norbert, 2010, Czym jest socjologia?, tłum. Bogdan Baran, Aletheia, Warszawa.
  28. Elias Norbert, 2011, O procesie cywilizacji: analizy socjo- i psychogenetyczne, tłum. Tadeusz Zabłudowski, Kamil Markiewicz, Wydawnictwo W.A.B., Warszawa.
  29. Fujimura Masayuki, 2000, The Welfare State, the Middle Class and the Welfare Society, „Review of Population and Social Policy”, t. 49(9), s. 1–23.
  30. Gottzen Lukas, Kremer-Sadlik Tamar, 2012, Fatherhood and Youth Sports: A Balancing Act between Care and Expectations, „Gender and Society”, t. 26(4), s. 639–664.
  31. Harris Scott R., 2006a, Social Constructionism and Social Inequality: An Introduction to a Special Issue of JCE, „Journal of Contemporary Ethnography”, t. 35(3), s. 223–235.
  32. Harris Scott R., 2006b, The Meanings of Marital Equality, SUNY Press, New York.
  33. Harris Scott R., 2010, What Is Constructionism? Navigating Its Use in Sociology, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colo.
  34. Kimmel Michael S., 2011, The Gendered Society, Oxford University Press, New York (4 wyd.).
  35. Kuhhirt Michael, 2012, Childbirth and the Long-Term Division of Labour within Couples: How Do Substitution, Bargaining Power, and Norms Affect Parents’ Time Allocation in West Germany?, „European Sociological Review”, t. 28(5), s. 565–582.
  36. Lamb Michael E., 2000, The History of Research on Father Involvement, „Marriage and Family Review”, t. 29(2–3), s. 23–42.
  37. Lamb Michael E., 2010, The Role of the Father in Child Development, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (5 wyd.).
  38. LaRossa Ralph, 1988, Fatherhood and Social Change, „Family Relations” t. 37(4), s. 451–457. Marsiglio William (red.), 1995, Fatherhood: Contemporary Theory, Research, and Social Policy, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  39. Miller Tina, 2011, Making Sense of Fatherhood: Gender, Caring and Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York.
  40. Parsons Talcott, 1954, Essays in Sociological Theory, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.
  41. Plantin Lars, 2007, Different Classes, Different Fathers?, „Community, Work and Family”, t. 10(1), s. 93–110.
  42. Plantin Lars i in., 2012, Comparing Transitions to Fatherhood across Contexts, w: Ann Nilsen, Julia Brannen, Suzan Lewis (red.), Transitions to Parenthood in Europe: A Comparative Life Course Perspective, Policy Press, Bristol–Chicago, Ill.
  43. Quilley Steven, 2004, Ecology, “Human Nature” and Civilizing Processes: Biology and Sociology in the Work of Norbert Elias, w: Steven Quilley, Steven Loyal (red.), The Sociology of Norbert Elias, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK–New York.
  44. Ridgeway Cecilia L., 2009, Framed Before We Know It How Gender Shapes Social Relations, „Gender and Society”, t. 23(2), s. 145–60.
  45. Ridgeway Cecilia L., Correll Shelley J., 2004, Unpacking the Gender System A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations, „Gender and Society”, t. 18(4), s. 510–531.
  46. Ruddick Sara, 1990, Thinking about Fathers, w: Marianne Hirsch, Evelyn F. Keller (red.), Conflicts in Feminism, Routledge, New York.
  47. Strauss Anselm, Corbin Juliet M., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage, London.
  48. Suwada Katarzyna, 2013, Miłość erotyczna w procesie cywilizacji. Próba interpretacji koncepcji Norberta Eliasa, Nomos, Kraków.
  49. Suwada Katarzyna, 2014, Mężczyzna, dzieci, dom, czyli o równości płciowej z perspektywy szwedzkiego taty, „Studia Humanistyczne AGH”, nr 2, s. 119–133.
  50. Suwada Katarzyna, Plantin Lars, 2014, On Fatherhood, Masculinities and Family Policies: A Comparative Analysis of Poland and Sweden, „Polish Sociological Review”, nr 4 (188), s. 509–524.
  51. Szlendak Tomasz, 2011, Socjologia rodziny: ewolucja, historia, zróżnicowanie, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  52. Titkow Anna, 2010, Do Men Have Their Own Glass Ceiling?, „Polish Sociological Review”, nr 4.
  53. West Candace, Zimmerman Don H., 1987, Doing Gender, „Gender and Society”, t. 1(2), s. 125–151.
  54. Zelditch Morris, 1955, Role Differentiation in the Nuclear Family: A Comparative Study, w: Robert F. Bales, Talcott Parsons (red.), Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.