Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 72 No. 4 (2019): Russia and Belarus: difficult neighbours

Politics of memory

The myth of the Great Patriotic War as a tool of Russia’s foreign policy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/SM.2019.72.4.15
Submitted: August 28, 2020
Published: August 21, 2020

Abstract

The sacralised Soviet victory over Nazism is a central element of the politics of memory, as utilised by the Russian state today. It constitutes an important theme in the  Kremlin’s ideological offensive that is intended to legitimise Russia’s great-power ambitions. The messianic myth of saving the world from absolute evil during the World War II is supposed to cover up the darker chapters of Soviet history and to legitimise all subsequent Soviet or Russian wars and military interventions, starting with Hungary, through Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan and ending with Ukraine and Syria. According to the current neo-Soviet interpretation, all these military actions were purely defensive and justified by external circumstances. The glorification of the “Yalta order” and the justification of the use of force in foreign policy is intended to legitimise Moscow’s pursuit of its current strategic aims, first and foremost of these being hegemony in the post-Soviet area and revision of the European security architecture.

References

  1. Czaputowicz J., Teorie stosunków międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2007.
  2. Domańska M., Conflict-dependent Russia. Domestic determinants of the Kremlin’s anti-Western policy, OSW Point of View 67, Warsaw 2017.
  3. Domańska M., Putinism after Putin. The deep structures of Russian authoritarianism, OSW Studies, 25 X 2019 [дата обращения: 20 VI 2020], электронный ресурс: <https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-studies/2019-10-25/putinism-after-putin>.
  4. Golubkova M., Obʺâvitʹ vsemirnym naslediem, 21 XI 2019 [дата обращения: 10 I 2020], электронный ресурс <https://rg.ru/2019/11/21/rossiia-potrebuet-priniatiia-specialnoj-rezoliucii-oon-ko-dniu-pobedy.html>.
  5. Klaś J., Muzea historyczne – pomiędzy pamięcią zbiorową a polityką pamięci historycznej, „Zarządzanie w kulturze” 2013, 14, z. 3.
  6. Langenbacher E., Collective Memory as a Factor in political culture and international relations, [in:] E. Langenbacher, Y. Shain (ed.), Power and the past. Collective Memory and international relations, Georgetown University Press 2010.
  7. Malinova O., Tema prošlogo v ritorike prezidentov Rossii, „Pro et Contra”, май–август 2011 [дата обращения: 10 I 2020], электронный ресурс: <https://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProetContra_52_106-122.pdf>.
  8. Putin: SSSR v vojne s Finlândiej hotel ispravitʹ ošibki 1917 goda, 14 III 2013 [дата обращения: 10 I 2020], электронный ресурс: <https://ria.ru/20130314/927341148.html>.
  9. Putin: v svoe vremâ ne bylo nikakoj Ukrainy, 7 VI 2019 [дата обращения: 10 I 2020], электронный ресурс: <https://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/putin-nikakoy-ukrainy-1559924813.html>.
  10. Vâčeslav Volodin: pravitelâm, kotorye zateâli peresmotr istorii, nikto ne podast ruku, 21 XI 2019 [дата обращения: 10 I 2020], электронный ресурс: <http://duma.gov.ru/news/47049/>.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.