Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
SP baner

Tom 52 Nr 3 (2024)

Społeczeństwo

Parents and Teachers as Co-producers in Primary Education: Between the Instrumental and Transformative Kinds of Co-production? Evidence from Poland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2024.52.3.02
Przesłane: 3 października 2022
Opublikowane: 24 września 2024

Abstrakt

The paper presents co-production, understood as a relationship between service users, i.e. parents and professionals (teachers) that requires their direct involvement in the tasks performed by primary schools and their providers, in Poland. This provides evidence about the relationship between two main school stakeholders in Ostromian study on classical co-production. The main hypothesis in the study assumes that two types of co-production, i.e. instrumental and transformative mode, can be observed in primary schools depending on the type of the provider, i.e. communes and third sector organisations. The study is based on a teacher and a parent survey conducted in the schools of both types of educational service providers in 2018-2021.

Bibliografia

  • Addi-Raccah, A. and R. Arviv-Elyashiv, ‘Parent Empowerment and Teacher Professionalism: Teachers’ Perspective’, Urban Education 43: 3, 2008, pp. 394–415, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907305037.
  • Alford, J., Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-production (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
  • Bartkowski, J., Tradycja i polityka: Wpływ tradycji kulturowych polskich regionów na współczesne zachowania społeczne i polityczne (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademickie ‘Żak’, 2003).
  • Bifulco, R. and H. F. Ladd, ‘Institutional Change and Coproduction of Public Services: The Effect of Charter Schools on Parental Involvement’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 4, 2006, pp. 553–576, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj001.
  • Blandi, V., Customer Uncertainty: A Source of Organizational Inefficiency in the Light of the Modularity Theory of the Firm, PhD Thesis, University of Trento, 2018.
  • Bovaird, T., ‘Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services’, Public Administration Review 67: 5, 2007, pp. 846–860, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15406210.2007.00773.x.
  • Brandsen, T. and M. Honingh, Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review 76: 3, 2016, pp. 427–435, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465.
  • Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., ‘Between Constraint Co-production and Real Co-creation of Public Services: Citizen Involvement as Public Service Innovation. Lessons from Poland’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies 33: 1, 2025, pp. 198–215, https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2024.2363872.
  • Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., Obywatelska polityka edukacyjna. Koprodukcja i współtworzenie (Cracow and Warsaw, Nomos and ISP PAN, 2022).
  • Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., ‘(Un)intended Consequences of the 2016 Educational Reform on Early Childhood Education and Care in Poland: The Story of a Few Applications That Led to Significant Disorder’, Policy Futures in Education18: 6, 2020, pp. 806–823, https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320923158.
  • Coleman, J. S., Equality of Educational Opportunity (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1966).
  • Dandalova, I., Participation and Democracy in Childcare Services in Eight European Countries. Case Study: Bulgaria (Liege: EMES International Research Network, 2003).
  • Davis, G. and E. Ostrom, A Public Economy Approach to Education: Choice and Co-Production’, International Political Science Review 12: 4, 1991, pp. 313–335, https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219101200405.
  • Durose, C., C. Mangan, C. Needham and J. Rees with M. Hilton, Transforming Local Public Services through Co-production (Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Arts & Humanities Research Council, 2013).
  • Epstein, J. L., ‘School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the Children we Share’, Phi Delta Kappan 76: 9, 1995, pp. 701–712.
  • Hansmann, H., ‘The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise’, Yale Law Journal 89: 5, 1980, pp. 835–898, https://doi.org/10.2307/796089.
  • Harris, A. and J. Goodall, ‘Do Parents Know They Matter? Engaging All Parents in Learning’, Educational Research 50: 3, 2008, pp. 277–289, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802309424.
  • Hirschman, A. O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970).
  • Honingh, M., E. Bondarouk, and T. Brandsen, ‘Co-Production in Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 86: 2, 2018, pp. 222–239, https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318769143.
  • Jakobsen, M., ‘Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 1, 2013, pp. 27–54, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus036.
  • Kang, S. and G.G. van Ryzin, Experimental Methods for Investigating Co-production, in E. Loeffler and T. Bovaird, eds, The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021), pp. 639–657.
  • Karsten, S., L. Guuske, J. Roeleveld, F. Charles and D. Elshof, ‘School Choice and Ethnic Segregation’, Educational Policy 17: 4, 2003, pp. 452–477.
  • Loeffler, E., Public Governance in a Network Society, in T. Bovaird and E. Loeffler, eds, Public Management and Governance, 3rd edn (London and New York: Routledge, 2015), pp. 207-222.
  • Marwell, N. P. and M. Brown, Towards a Governance Framework for Government-Nonprofit Relations, in W. W. Powell and P. Bromley, eds, Nonprofit Sector (Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, 2020), pp. 231–250, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503611085-014.
  • Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino and M. Sicilia, ‘Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction’, Public Administration Review 77: 5, 2017, pp. 766–776, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765.
  • Osborne S. P., K. A. Brown, Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organisations (London and New York: Routledge, 2005).
  • Osborne S. P., K. Strokosch, ‘It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives’, British Journal of Management 24: S1, 2013, pp. S31–S47, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12010.
  • Parks R. B., P. C. Baker, L. Kiser, R. Oakerson, E. Ostrom, V. Ostrom, S. L. Percy, M. B. Vandivort, G. P. Whitaker and R. Wison, ‘Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations’, Policy Studies Journal 9: 7, 1981, pp. 1001–1011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x.
  • Pestoff, V., A Democratic Architecture for the Welfare State (London and New York: Routledge, 2008).
  • Pestoff, V., ‘Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production’, Public Management Review 2014, 16: 3, 2014, pp. 384–401, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841460.
  • Pestoff, V., Co-production and Japanese Healthcare. Work Environment, Governance, Service Quality and Social Values (New York and London: Routledge, 2021).
  • Porter, D. O., ‘Co-Production and Network Structures in Public Education’, in V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen and B. Verschuere, eds, New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production (London and New York: Routledge, 2012), pp. 145–168.
  • Sadura, P., ‘Od centralnego planowania do współzarządzania? Polski system edukacji w epoce zmiany paradygmatu administrowania’, Zarządzanie Publiczne 35: 1, 2016, pp. 47–57.
  • Sorensen, E. and S. I. Vabo, ‘A Public Innovation Perspective on Change in Local Democracy’, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 25: 1, 2020, article 1, https://innovation.cc/document/2020-25-1-1-introduction-a-public-innovation-perspective-on-change-in-local-democracy (access: 24 September 2024).
  • Steen, T. and T. Brandsen, ‘Coproduction during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will it last?’, Public Administration Review 80: 5, 2020, pp. 851–855, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13258.
  • Thomsen, M. K, ‘Citizen Coproduction: The Influence of Self-Efficacy Perception and Knowledge of How to Coproduce’, The American Review of Public Administration 47: 3, 2015, pp. 340–353, https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015611744.
  • Voorberg, W., V. J. J. M. Bekkers and L. G. Tummers, ‘A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey’, Public Management Review 17: 9, 2015, pp. 1335–1357, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
  • Whitaker, G. P., ‘Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery’, Public Administration Review 40: 3, 1980, pp. 240–246, https://doi.org/10.2307/975377.
  • Whitty, G., ‘Changing Modes of Teacher Professionalism: Traditional, Managerial, Collaborative and Democratic’, in B. Cunningham, ed., Exploring professionalism (London: Bedford Way Papers, 2008), pp. 28–49.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.