Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
SP baner

Vol. 47 No. 2 (2019)

Political institutions

Divided Power in Polish Municipalities: Characteristics of the Phenomenon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2019.47.2.1
Submitted: December 30, 2019
Published: June 28, 2019

Abstract

The article discusses the specificity of horizontal power relations at the municipal level in Poland. The considerations focus on the political situation in which the municipal mayor/town mayor/city mayor is a representative of a different electoral committee than the majority of representatives in the municipal council. This situation is defined as divided power. The author outlines the historical and legal context of the emergence of divided power.
She indicates the institutional causes of the phenomenon, including legal mechanisms that block the formation of divided power systems. She also describes the influence of the electoral system on the formation of divided power. Moreover, the scale and spatial distribution of the phenomenon are shown and the municipalities in which this system of power functions are characterised. The results of the local government elections that took place in Poland between 2010 and 2014 are analysed.

References

  1. Ames B., Baker A., Renno L., Split-ticket voting as the rule: Voters and permanent divided government in Brazil, „Electoral Studies”, 2009, nr 28, s. 8-20.
  2. Bobbio L., Italy: After the Storm [w:] Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments, red. B. Denters, L.Rose, Londyn 2005, s. 6-24.
  3. Dahl R., Tufte E.R., Size and Democracy, Stanford 1973.
  4. Fiorina M., An era of divided government, „Developments in American politics”, 1992, nr 3, s. 324-354.
  5. Gendźwiłł. A., Żółtak T., Rutkowski J., Niekonkurencyjne wybory, brakujący kandydaci. Dlaczego niektóre komitety wyborcze nie wystawiają kandydatów na burmistrzów? „Studia Regionalne i Lokalne”, 2015, nr 4(62), s. 64-79.
  6. Haman J., Większościowy system wyborczy: oczekiwania, ograniczenia, rozwiązania alternatywne, „Decyzje”, 2005, nr 4, s. 5-28.
  7. Kelbel C., Van Ingelgom V., Verhaegen S., Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014, „Politics and Governance”, 2016, nr 4, s. 116-129.
  8. Mouritzen P., Svara J., Leadership in the apex. Politicians and administrations in western local government, University of Pittsburgh Pre 2002.
  9. Nohlen D., Prawo wyborcze i system partyjny. O teorii systemów wyborczych, Warszawa 2004.
  10. Piontek D., Personalizacja rywalizacji wyborczej w kampanii parlamentarnej, „Rocznik Nauk Społecznych”, 2012, nr 3, s. 109-126.
  11. Roscoe D., The choosers or the choices? Voter characteristics and the structure of electoral competition as explanations for ticket splitting, „Journal of Politics”, 2003, nr 4, s. 1147-1164.
  12. Sidor M., Kuć-Czajkowska K.A., Wasil J., Wpływ rozwiązań przyjętych w Kodeksie wyborczym na zjawisko koabitacji w gminach, „Polityka i Społeczeństwo”, 2015, nr 3(13), s. 151-164.
  13. Sidor M., Kuć-Czajkowska K.A., Wasil J., Koabitacja na poziomie gminnym, Warszawa 2018.
  14. Swianiewicz P., Gendźwiłł A., Łukomska J., Kurniewicz A., Wielkość gmin i powiatów a sprawność ich funkcjonowania. Hipotezy wielkoludów i liliputów, Warszawa 2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.