Tom 69 Nr 4 (2025): Granice symboliczne w komunikacji społecznej
Artykuły i rozprawy
Tokenism or Inclusion? Symbolic Boundaries Between “Us” and “Them” in the Polish Queer Community’s Reception of LGBT+ Ads
University of Silesia in Katowice
Abstrakt
Reprezentacja osób LGBT+ w reklamie wywołuje zróżnicowane reakcje, kształtowane przez tożsamość społeczną, normy kulturowe i indywidualne przekonania. Takie przedstawienia mogą budzić zarówno akceptację, jak i opór, szczególnie w państwach takich jak Polska, w których prawa osób LGBT+ pozostają kwestią sporną. Niniejsze badanie zawiera analizę reakcji polskiej społeczności queer na reklamy z motywami LGBT+. Autorka wykorzystuje przy tym teorię tożsamości społecznej oraz koncepcję granic symbolicznych. Wyniki analizy wywiadów fokusowych ujawniły napięcie między potrzebą autentycznej reprezentacji a obawami o tokenizm i motywacje komercyjne. Zastosowanie konstruktywistycznej teorii ugruntowanej pomogło zrozumieć, w jaki sposób osoby queer odbierają przekazy reklamowe, pozwoliło sformułować wnioski na temat mediów, tożsamości i inkluzywnego marketingu w spolaryzowanych społeczeństwach.
Bibliografia
- Aaker Jennifer, Brumbaugh Anne, Grier Sonya, 2000, Nontarget Markets and Viewer Distinctiveness: The Impact of Target Marketing on Advertising Attitudes, „Journal of Consumer Psychology”, 9(3): 127–40.
- Åkestam Nina, Rosengren Sara, Dahlen Micael, 2017, Think about It — Can Portrayals of Homosexuality in Advertising Prime Consumer-perceived Social Connectedness and Empathy?, “European Journal of Marketing”, 51(1): 82–98.
- Angelini James, Bradley Samuel, 2010, Homosexual Imagery in Print Advertisements: Attended, Remembered, But Disliked, “Journal of Homosexuality”, 57(4): 485–502.
- Appiah Osei, 2001, Ethnic Identification on Adolescents’ Evaluations of Advertisements, “Journal of Advertising Research”, 41(5): 7–22.
- Barbour Rosaline, 2011, Badania fokusowe, tłum. Barbara Komorowska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
- Bhat Subodh, Leigh Thomas, Wardlow Daniel, 1996, The Effect of Homosexual Imaginary in Advertising on Attitude toward the Ad, “Journal of Homosexuality”, 31(1–2): 161–76.
- Bourdieu Pierre, 2010, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.
- Charmaz Kathy, 2000, Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods, in: Norman Denzin (ed.), Yvonna Lincoln (ed.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 509–31.
- Charmaz Kathy, 2006, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, London: Sage Publications.
- Cunningham George, Melton Nicole, 2014, Signals and Cues: LGBT Inclusive Advertising and Consumer Attraction, „Services Marketing Quarterly”, 23(1): 37–46.
- Dimitrieska Savica, Stamevska Elizabeta, Stankovska Aleksandra, 2019, Inclusive Marketing — Reality or Make Up, “Economics and Management”, 16(2): 112–9.
- Eisend Martin, Hermann Erik, 2019, Consumer Responses to Homosexual Imagery in Advertising: A Meta-Analysis, “Journal of Advertising”, 48(8): 380–400.
- Gerbner George, 1967, Newsmen and Schoolmen: The State and Problems of Education Reporting, „Journalism Quarterly”, 44(2): 211–24.
- Gerbner George, 1998, Cultivation Analysis: An Overview, „Mass Communication & Society”, 1(3/4): 175–94.
- Gerbner George, Gross Larry, 1976, Living with Television: The Violence Profile, „Journal of Communication”, 26(2): 173–99.
- Grier Sonya, Brumbaugh Anne, Thornton Corliss, 2006, Crossover Dreams: Consumer Responses to Ethnic-Oriented Products, “Journal of Marketing”, 70(2): 35–51.
- Hall Stuart (ed.), 1997, Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London: Sage Publication.
- Hooten Mary, Noeva Kristina, Hammonds Frank, 2009, The Effects of Homosexual Imagery in Advertisements on Brand Perception and Purchase Intention, “Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal”, 37(9): 1231–38.
- Johnson Guillaume, Elliott Roger, Grier Sonya, 2010, Conceptualizing Multicultural Advertising Effects in the “New” South Africa, “Journal of Global Marketing”, 23(3): 189–207.
- Keller Reiner, Charmaz Kathy, 2016, A Personal Journey with Grounded Theory Methodology. Kathy Charmaz in Conversation with Reiner Keller, “Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, 17(1), n.p.
- Kim Kacy, Um Namhyun, Kwon Eun, Wilcox David, 2013, Symbols or Icons in Gay-Themed Ads: How to Target a Gay Audience, „Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(6): 1–15.
- Kitzinger Jenny, 2005, Focus Group Research: Using Group Dynamics to Explore Perceptions, Experiences and Understandings, in: Immy Holloway (ed.), Qualitative Research in Health Care, Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 56–70.
- Lamont Michèle, 2010, Looking Back at Bourdieu, in: Silva Elizabeth (ed.), Warde Alan (ed.), Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Setting Accounts and Developing Alternatives, London: Routledge, pp. 128–41.
- Lamont Michèle, 2012, How Has Bourdieu Been Good to Think with? The Case of the United States, „Sociological Forum”, 27: 228–37.
- Lamont Michèle, Molnár Virag, 2002, The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences, „Annual Review of Sociology”, 28: 167– 95.
- Lamont Michèle, Pendergrass Sabrina, Pachucki Mark, 2015, Symbolic Boundaries, in: James Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), Elselvier, Oxford: 850–5.
- Liamputtong Pranee, 2015, Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice, London: Sage Publications.
- Morgan David, 2021, Robert Merton and the History of Focus Groups: Standing on the Shoulders of a Giant?, „The American Sociologist”, 53(3): 364–73.
- Naderifar Mahin, Goli Hamideh, Ghaljaei Fereshteh, 2017, Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research, “Strides in Development of Medical Education”, 14(3): sdme.67670.
- Oakenfull Gillian, 2013, What Matters: Factors Influencing Gay Consumers’ Evaluations of “Gay-Friendly” Corporate Activities, “Journal of Public Policy & Marketing”, 32: 79–89.
- Oakenfull Gillian, Greenlee Timothy, 2004, The Three Rules of Crossing over from Gay Media to Mainstream Media Advertising: Lesbians, Lesbians, Lesbians, “Journal of Business Research, 57(11): 1276–85.
- Oakenfull Gillian, Greenlee Timothy, 2005, Queer Eye for a Gay Guy: Using Market-Specific Symbols in Advertising to Attract Gay Consumers without Alienating the Mainstream, „Psychology and Marketing”, 22(5): 421–39.
- Oakenfull Gillian, Mccarthy Michael, Greenlee Timothy, 2008, Targeting a Minority Without Alienating the Majority: Advertising to Gays and Lesbians in Mainstream Media, “Journal of Advertising Research”, 48(2): 191–98.
- Read Glenna, Driel Irene, Potter Robert, 2018, Same-Sex Couples in Advertisements: An Investigation of the Role of Implicit Attitudes on Cognitive Processing and Evaluation, “Journal of Advertising”, 47(1): 1–16.
- Tajfel Henri, 1978, Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press.
- Tajfel Henri, Turner John, 1986, The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour, in: William Austin (ed.), Stephen Worchel (ed.), Psychology of Intergroup Relation, Chicago: Hall Publishers, pp. 7–24.
- Turner John, Hogg Michael, Oakes Penelope, Reicher Stephen, Wetherell Margaret, 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell.
- Um Namhyun, 2016, Consumers’ Responses to Implicit and Explicit Gay-Themed Advertising in Gay vs. Mainstream Media, „Journal of Promotion Management”, 22(3): 461–77.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
