Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 51 No. 1 (2007): Tematy popkultury

Articles and essays

Moving out from the Point of View of the Concept of Embodiment

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2007.51.1.7
Submitted: August 7, 2023
Published: March 20, 2007

Abstract

The article is an attempt to describe the situation of moving out and being at home as an embodiment and habit according to the concept created by Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Claude Kaufmann. The article has been divided into four parts which attempt to answer questions which explain the moving out experience. First, what happens to the home and in the home when one or several of its inhabitants leave? The answer to this question was based on the concept of the body and habits formulated by Maurice Merleau-Ponty. The consequent statement is that such a situation leads to a sudden disruption of the habits associated with the home. Second, what is the process of returning to the situation in which the home feels one’s own — i.e. where the inhabitant feels comfortable? At this point attention is drawn to the research into habits conducted by Jean-Claude Kaufmann which discusses the process of the creation of new habits. Third, what is the embodiment of a home? Here Peter King’s work was very helpful. He states that the feeling of safety, intimacy and privacy in the home are closely related to the process of embodiment. Fourth, what are the consequences for the residents of a change in the domestic landscape? At this point the concept of embodiment will be associated with the problem of self-reference, which leads to the conclusion that a change in the domestic landscape (people and things) is associated with a change in the residents themselves.

References

  1. Berger Peter L., Luckmannn Thomas, 1983, Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości, tłum. Józef Niżnik, PIW, Warszawa.
  2. Dillon Martin (red.), 1997, Ecart and Différance: Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on Seeing and Writing, Humanities Press, New Jersey.
  3. Dennett Daniel C., 1997, Natura umysłów, tłum. Witold Turopolski, Wydawnictwo CIS, Warszawa.
  4. Edensor Tim, 2004, Tożsamość narodowa, kultura popularna i życie codzienne, tłum. Agata Sadza, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków.
  5. Giza-Poleszczuk Anna, Marody Mirosława, 2006, Konteksty teoretyczne pojęcia „więź społeczna”, „Societas/Communitas”, nr 1, s. 9–21.
  6. Kaufmann Jean-Claude, 2004, Ego. Socjologia jednostki, tłum. Krzysztof Wakar, Oficyna Naukowa. Warszawa.
  7. King Peter, 2004, Private Dwelling: Contemplating the Use of Housing, Routledge, London–New York.
  8. McCracken Grant, 1990, Culture and Consumption, Indiana University Press, Bloomington–Indianapolis.
  9. Mallet Shelley, 2004, Understanding Home: A Critical Review of the Literature, „The Sociological Review”, t. 52, s. 62–89.
  10. Marcoux Jean-Sebastien, 2001, The Refurbishment of Memory, w: Daniel Miller (red.), Home Possessions: Material Culture behind Closed Doors, Berg, New York–Oxford.
  11. Merleau-Ponty Maurice, 2001, Fenomenologia percepcji, tłum. Małgorzata Kowalska, Jacek Migasiński, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa.
  12. Migasiński Jacek, 1995, Merleau-Ponty, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa.
  13. Reynolds Jack, 2002, Habituality and Undecidability: A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on the Decision, „International Journal of Philosophical Studies”, t. 10, s. 449–466.
  14. Sojak Radosław, 2004, Paradoks antropologiczny, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
  15. Somerville Peter, 1992, Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooflessness and Rootlessness?, „International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, t. 16, s. 529–539.
  16. Watson Sophie, Austerberry Helen, 1986, Housing and Homelessness: A Feminist Perspective, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.