Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
SM baner

Vol. 72 No. 2 (2019): Kryzys na świecie - świat w kryzysie

Forum

Between neo-revisionist neoclassical realism and pragmatism. The foreign policy of the Likud party under Benjamin Netanyahu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/SM.2019.72.2.11
Submitted: January 26, 2020
Published: September 27, 2019

Abstract

Neo-revisionism is a term proposed by Ilan Peleg and Paul Shaum for the philosophy originated by Menachem Begin in 1977 and kept by Yitzhak Shamir and Benjamin Netanyahu. It invokes Vladimir Jabotinski’s revisionism with a strong emphasis on state-centrism, bilateral alliances, power and territory. The foreign policy of the Likud leaders showed that a postulated ideological hard-line stand is far from political reality and is closer to a pragmatic interpretation of state’s surrounding. The author will try to examine the relation between ideology and pragmatism in the Likud’s policy. It will also be shown in the light of neoclassical realism – close to neo-revisionism – by the examples of power, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, non-state representatives but also in the light of pragmatism. The overview of the Likud’s policy is divided between ideologised aspects of securing the self-interest of the state, Israeli raison d'état, acting against Arab states’ ambitions and securing the territory as a strategic depth and between pragmatic decisions like Begin’s peace treaty with Egypt and returning the Sinai, Ariel Sharon’s withdrawal of the settlements from the Gaza Strip or the freezing of settlement by Benjamin Netanyahu.

References

  1. Ahren R., Israel reacts with disgust and disdain to UNESCO Hebron decision, “The Times of Israel” [online], 7 VII 2017 [accessed: 9 V 2018], available at: <https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-reacts-with-disgust-and-disdain-to-unesco-hebron-decision/>.
  2. Ahren R., UNESCO panel okays softened text blasting Israel over Jerusalem activity, “The Times of Israel” [online], 4 VII 2017 [accessed: 9 V 2018], available at: <https://www.timesofisrael.com/unesco-panel-okays-softened-text-blasting-israel-over-jerusalem-activity/>.
  3. Ahren R., Fulbright A., On Independence Day, UNESCO okays resolution denying Israeli claims to Jerusalem, “The Times of Israel” [online], 2 V 2017 [accessed: 9 V 2018], available at: <https://www.timesofisrael.com/on-independence-day-unesco-okays-resolution-ignoring-jewish-links-to-jerusalem/>.
  4. Ayalon D., Challenges to Israeli foreign policy, “The Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs” 2010, No. 1.
  5. Bosley D., The United States and Israel: A (neo) realist relationship, “In-Spire Journal of Law, Politics and Societies” 2008, vol. 3, No. 2.
  6. Brecher M., Israel’s foreign policy. Challenges of the 1970s, “International Journal” 1973, vol. 28, No. 4.
  7. Czaputowicz J., Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe. Współczesne koncepcje, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2012.
  8. Gilboa E., Obama in Israel. Fixing American-Israeli relations, “The Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs” 2013, vol. 7, No. 2.
  9. Guzansky Y., Tacit allies. Israel and the Arab Gulf States, “The Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs” 2011, vol. 5, No. 1.
  10. Haber J., Na straży, “Chad Ness”, 1 XII 1937.
  11. Hatagli T., Kłamstwo o hawladze i prawda o wojnie, “Chad Ness”, 1 VIII 1938.
  12. Hazan E., Why a united Jerusalem is a must, “Washington Examiner” [online], 13 XII 2017 [accessed: 9 V 2018], available at: <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/why-a-united-jerusalem-is-a-must>.
  13. Inbar E., Jews, Jewishness and Israel’s foreign policy, “Jewish Political Studies Review” 1990, vol. 2.
  14. Keinon K., Lazaroff T., Netanyahu announces plans for fi rst new West Bank settlement in 25 years, “The Jerusalem Post” [online], 2 II 2017 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Netanyahu-announces-creation-of-new-settlement-480296#article=6024MUY5M0UxQjJFRUJCRDI5N0U3RjlBODgzQ0ZCRDNGREU=>.
  15. Kitchen N., Systemic pressures and domestic ideas. A neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation, “Review of International Studies” 2010, vol. 36, issue 1.
  16. Kozub-Karkut M., Realizm neoklasyczny – główne założenia i możliwości, [in:] Teoria realizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Założenia i zastosowania badawcze, red. E. Haliżak, J. Czaputowicz, Rambler, Warszawa 2014.
  17. Lazaroff T., Elkin: Start preparing for one million settlers in the West Bank, “The Jerusalem Post” [online], 14 XI 2017 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Elkin-Start-preparing-for-one-million-settlers-in-the-West-Bank-514251>.
  18. Lazaroff T., Israel to UNESCO: Reject fake history on Jerusalem, “The Jerusalem Post” [online], 1 V 2017 [accessed: 9 V 2018], available at: <https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Israel-to-UNESCO-Reject-fake-history-on-Jerusalem-489500>.
  19. Lazaroff T., Right wing leaders: Israel should ignore Trump on settlement annexation, “The Jerusalem Post” [online], 13 II 2018 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Right-wing-leaders-Israel-should-ignore-Trump-on-settlement-annexation-542491>.
  20. Magid J., Likud top body votes to urge annexing parts of the West Bank, “The Times of Israel” [online], 31 XII 2017 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.timesofisrael.com/likud-top-body-votes-to-annex-parts-of-the-west-bank/>.
  21. Magid J., Netanyahu vows he will never evacuate another settlement, “The Times of Israel” [online], 28 VIII 2017 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-vows-he-will-never-evacuate-another-settlement/>.
  22. Magid J., PM blocks settlement annexation bill from coming to vote, “The Times of Israel” [online], 8 II 2018 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.timesofisrael.com/pm-blocks-settlement-annexation-bill-from-coming-to-vote/>.
  23. Mearsheimer J. J., Walt S. M., The Israel lobby and U. S. foreign policy, “Middle East Policy” 2006, vol. 13, No. 3.
  24. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy, ed. S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, J. W. Taliaferro, Cambridge University Press, New York 2009.
  25. Netanyahu N., A place among the nations. Israel and the World, Bantam Books, New York 1993.
  26. Peleg I., Shaum P., Israeli neo-revisionism and American neoconservatism. The unexplored parallels, “Middle East Journal” 2007, vol. 61, No. 1.
  27. Rose G., Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy, “World Politics” 1998, vol. 51, No. 1.
  28. Ripsman N. M., Taliaferro J. W., Lobell S. E., Neoclassical realist theory of international politics, Oxford University Press, New York 2016.
  29. Rudoren J., Ashkenas J., Netanyahu and the settlements, “The New York Times” [online], 18 III 2015 [accessed: 8 V 2018], available at: <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/03/12/world/middleeast/netanyahu-west-bank-settlements-israel-election.html>.
  30. Seliktar O., New Zionism and the foreign policy system of Israel, Routledge, London 1986.
  31. Shlaim A., Yaniv A., Domestic politics and foreign policy in Israel, “International Affairs” 1980, vol. 56, No. 2.
  32. Szydzisz M., Sekurytyzacja jako narzędzie polityki zagranicznej Izraela w świetle teorii regionalnych kompleksów bezpieczeństwa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2019.
  33. Taliaferro J. W., Lobell S. E., Ripsman N. M., Introduction. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy, [in:] Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy, ed. S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, J. W. Taliaferro, Cambridge University Press, New York 2009.
  34. Teoria realizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Założenia i zastosowania badawcze, red. E. Haliżak, J. Czaputowicz, Rambler, Warszawa 2014.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.