Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
KiS baner

Tom 62 Nr 4 (2018): DYNAMICS OF WORK AND LIFE CHANGES

Z warsztatów badawczych

Women’s Sense-making of Opportunity Structures in the Profession of Attorney in Poland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2018.62.4.6
Przesłane: 23 kwietnia 2021
Opublikowane: 28 grudnia 2018

Abstrakt

The article examines the ways in which women make sense of the opportunity structures in which they operate as female attorneys in Poland. The study applies Joan Acker’s theory of gendered organization and a narrative approach to the analysis of interview data with 15 Polish female attorneys who practice law and are members of the Warsaw Chamber of the Bar. These women are pursuing their careers in a highly competitive and still male-dominated profession. The results demonstrate the continuing struggle of women to reconcile the often conflicting expectations and roles of professional and personal lives. The findings point towards four gendering processes that venture from the structure of the profession of attorney in Poland: professionally committed women are not limited by their family life; women need to invest more in activities that attract new clients; male attorneys are attributed greater authority; and women are more empathic. These processes sustain gender inequalities in the profession of attorney as they carry expectations of women to adapt to the existing professional structures in order to access more equal career opportunities. However, by making sense of the shared experiences of work-life conflict and of the feminine/masculine dichotomy, women exert agency to their claims to professional expertise.

Bibliografia

  1. Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organization.” Gender and Society 4(2): 139–158.
  2. Acker, Joan.1992. “From sex roles to gendered institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21(5): 565–569.
  3. Acker, Joan. 2004. “Gender, capitalism and globalization.” Critical Sociology 30(1): 17–41.
  4. Acker, Joan. 2012. “Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 31(3): 214–224.
  5. Archer, Margaret. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bacik, Ivana, Eileen Drew. 2006. “Struggling with juggling: Gender and work/life balance in the legal professions.” Women’s Studies International Forum 29(2): 136–146.
  7. Bagust, Joanne. 2012. “Keeping gender on the agenda.” Griffith Law Review 21(1): 137–163.
  8. Biese, Ingrid, Marta Choroszewicz. 2018. “Creating alternative solutions for work: Experiences of women managers and lawyers in Poland and the USA.” In: S. Taylor, S. Luckman (eds.). The ‘New Normal’ of Working Lives: Critical Studies in Contemporary Work and Employment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Blair-Loy Mary. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  10. Bloksgaard, Lotte. 2011. “Masculinities, femininities and work—the horizontal gender segregation in the Danish Labour market.” Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 1(2): 5–21.
  11. Bolton, Sharon C. 2005. Emotion Management in the Workplace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Bolton, Sharon C., Daniel Muzio. 2007. “Can’t live with ‘em; Can’t live without ‘em: Gendered segmentation in the legal profession.” Sociology 41(1): 47–61.
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Masculine Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  14. Brockman, Joan. 2001. Gender in the Legal Profession: Fitting or Breaking the Mould. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  15. Burakowski, Tadeusz. 1976. “Trudna droga kobiet do adwokatury” [Women’s difficult path to the profession of attorney]. In: R. Łyczywek (ed.). Szkice z dziejów adwokatury polskiej [A sketch about the history of Polish Bar]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.
  16. Choroszewicz, Marta. 2014a. Managing Competitiveness in Pursuit of a Legal Career: Women Attorneys in Finland and Poland. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  17. Choroszewicz, Marta. 2014b. “Exposing the myth of equal career opportunities: Women attorneys in Finland and Poland.” In: M. Virkajärvi (ed.). Työelämän tutkimuspäivät 2013. Työn tulevaisuus [Conference on work research 2013: Future of work]. Työelämän tutkimuspäivien konferenssijulkaisuja 5. Tampereen yliopisto: Työelämän tutkimuskeskus.
  18. Choroszewicz, Marta. 2015. “‘It is also about helping people’. Women attorneys’ commitment to public service and incentives for pro bono work in Finland and Poland.” Shaping and Re-Shaping the Boundaries of Working Life Labournet conference. Tampere, Finland, October 2015.
  19. Choroszewicz, Marta. 2016. “Women attorneys and gendering processes in law firms in Helsinki.” Sosiologia 53(2): 122–137.
  20. Davies, Celia. 1996. “The sociology of professions and the profession of gender.” Sociology 30(4): 661–678.
  21. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1993. Women in law. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  22. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 2007. “Great divides: The cultural, cognitive, and social bases of the global subordination of women.” American Sociological Review 72(1): 1–22.
  23. Friedrichs, David O. 2006. Law in Our Lives. An Introduction. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
  24. Fuszara, Małgorzata. 2003. “Women lawyers in Poland under the impact of post-1989 transformation.” In: U. Schultz and G. Shaw (eds.). Women in the world’s legal professions. Oxford: Hart.
  25. Fuszara, Małgorzata. 2005. “Kobiety prawniczki” [Women lawyers]. In: M. Fuszara (ed.). Kobiety w Polsce [Women in Poland]. Warszawa: Trio.
  26. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  27. Hagan, John, Fiona M. Kay. 1995. Gender in Practice: A Study of Lawyers’ Lives. New York: Oxford University.
  28. Haynes, Kathryn. 2012. “Body beautiful? Gender, identity and the body in professional service firms.” Gender, Work and Organization 19(5): 489–507.
  29. Hearn, Jeff, Ingrid Biese, Marta Choroszewicz, Liisa Husu. 2016. “Gender, diversity and intersectionality in professions and potential professions: Analytical, historical and contemporary perspectives.” In: M. Dent, I. Bourgeault, J.-L. Denis, E. Kuhlmann eds.). The Routledge Companion in the Professions and Professionalism. London: Routledge.
  30. Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  31. Huppatz, Kate. 2009. “Reworking Bourdieu’s ‘capital’: Feminine and female capitals in the field of paid caring work.” Sociology 43(1): 45–66.
  32. Huppatz, Kate. 2012. Gender Capital at Work. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Kantola, Johanna. 2008. “‘Why do all the women disappear?’ Gendering processes in a political science department.” Gender, Work and Organization 15(2): 202–225.
  34. Kay, Fiona M., Stacey Alarie, Jones Adjei. 2013. “Leaving private practice: How organizational context, time pressures, and structural inflexibilities shape departures from private law practice.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2): 1223–1260.
  35. Kay, Fiona M., Stacey Alarie, Jones Adjei. 2016. “Undermining gender equality: Female attrition from private law practice.” Law and Society Review 50(3): 766–801.
  36. McCall, Leslie. 1992. “Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism and conceptions of social order.” Theory and Society 21(6): 837–867.
  37. McNay, Lois. 1999. “Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexibility.” Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 95–117.
  38. Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2003. “‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’ gendering practices, practicing gender at work.” Gender and Society 13(3): 342–366.
  39. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1985. “Portia in a different voice: Speculations on a women’s lawyering process.” Berkeley Women’s Law Journal 1(1): 39–63.
  40. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2005. “Portia redux: Another look at gender, feminism, and legal ethics.” In: S.D. Carle (ed.). Lawyer’s Ethics and the Pursuit of Social Justice: A Critical Reader. New York: New York University Press.
  41. Meyerson, Debra E., Joyce K. Fletcher. 2000. “A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling.” Harvard Business Review 78(1): 126–137.
  42. Moen, Phyllis, Erin L. Kelly, Rachelle Hill. 2011. “Does enhancing work-time control and flexibility reduce turnover? A naturally occurring experiment.” Social Problems 58(1): 69–98.
  43. Mossman, Mary Jane. 1994. “Lawyers and family life: New directions for the 1990s.” Feminist Legal Studies 2(1): 61–82.
  44. Mrowczynski, Rafael. 2016. “Institutional professionalization of lawyers in state-socialism and post-socialism: Poland and Russia compared.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 23(2): 157–184.
  45. Nascimbene, Bruno. 2009. The Legal Profession in the European Union. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  46. Pacholok, Shelley. 2009. “Gendered strategies of self: Navigating hierarchy and contesting masculinities.” Gender, Work and Organization 16(4): 471–500.
  47. Pierce, Jennifer L. 2010. Women and men as litigators: Gender differences on the job. In: J. Goodman (ed.). Global Perspectives on Gender and Work: Readings and Interpretations. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  48. Pinnington, Ashly H., Jörgen Sandberg. 2013. “Lawyers’ professional careers: Increasing women’s inclusion in the partnership of law firms.” Gender, Work and Organization 20(6): 616–631.
  49. Plantenga, Janneke, Chantal Remery. 2010. Flexible Working Time Arrangements and Gender Equality: A Comparative Review of 30 European Countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  50. Plomien, Anna. 2009. “Welfare state, gender, and reconciliation of work and family in Poland: Policy developments and practice in a new EU member.” Social Policy and Administration 49(2): 136–151.
  51. Poggio, Barbara. 2006. “Editorial: Outline of a theory of gender practices.” Gender, Work and Organization 13(3): 225–233.
  52. Polkinghorne, Donald E. 1988. Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  53. Rhode, Deborah. 2003. “Gender and the profession: An American perspective.” In: U. Schultz, G. Shaw (eds.). Women in the World’s Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart.
  54. Rollnik-Sadowska, Ewa. 2010. Przedsiębiorczość kobiet w Polsce [Enterpreneurship of women in Poland]. Warszawa: Difin.
  55. Salmela, Mikko, Verena Mayer (eds.). 2009. Emotions, Ethnics and Authenticity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  56. Simpson, Ruth, Anne Ross-Smith, Patricia Lewis. 2010. “Merit, special contribution and choice: How women negotiate between sameness and difference in their organizational lives.” Gender in Management: An International Journal 25(3): 198–207.
  57. Sommerlad, Hilary. 2016. “‘A pit to put women in’: Professionalism, work intensification, sexualisation and work—life balance in the legal profession in England and Wales.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 23(1): 61–82.
  58. Sterling, Joyce S., Nancy Reichman. 2016. “Overlooked and undervalued: Women in private law practice.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 373–393.
  59. Szafraniec, Jolanta. 1982. “Kobieta w zawodzie adwokata” [A woman in the profession of attorney]. Palestra 26(8): 71–82.
  60. Sztanderska, Urszula, Gabriela Grotkowska. 2009. “Rynek pracy kobiet w Polsce w latach 1992–2007” [Female labour market in Poland in years 1992–2007]. In: I.E. Kotowska, U. Sztanderska, I.Wójcicka (eds.). Strukturowe i kulturowe uwarunkowania aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Polsce [The structural and cultural determinants of women’s professional activity in Poland]. Warszawa: Scholar.
  61. Thornton, Margaret. 1996. Dissonance and Distrust: Women in the Legal Profession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  62. Walsh, Janet. 2012. “Not worth the sacrifice? Women’s aspirations and career progression in law firms.” Gender, Work and Organization 19(5): 508–531.
  63. Wóycicka, Irena. 2009. “Model opieki w Polsce” [The care regime in Poland]. In: I.E. Kotowska, U. Sztanderska, I.Wójcicka (eds.). Strukturowe i kulturowe uwarunkowania aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Polsce [The structural and cultural determinants of women’s professional activity in Poland]. Warszawa: Scholar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 24 25 26 27 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.