Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
KiS baner

Tom 60 Nr 2 (2016): WIDZIANE W MIEŚCIE

Artykuły i rozprawy

Wideozwiedzanie. Badania miasta w perspektywie paradygmatu mobilności

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2016.60.2.8
Przesłane: 29 kwietnia 2021
Opublikowane: 23 maja 2016

Abstrakt

This article contains a presentation of the theoretical and methodological premises of various kinds of mobile social research in the city. The departure point is to treat moving as a characteristic of contemporary socio-cultural life, as in the premises of the mobility paradigm. Mobility is described as the context for experiencing the urban space and the point of departure for mobile social research. The traits and various types of such research are indicated, including the principles that connect them with visual research techniques. ‘Walking with video’ is used as an example. The author recounts research experiences connected with the use of this technique, on three levels: preparation, realization, and processing and communication.

Bibliografia

  1. Bachmann-Medick Doris, 2012, Cultural turns. Nowe kierunki w naukach o kulturze, tłum. Krystyna Krzemieniowa, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa.
  2. Bauman Zygmunt, 2006, Płynna nowoczesność, tłum. Tomasz Kunz, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków.
  3. Bean Jonathan, 2008, Beyond Walking with Video: Co-Creating Representation, „Epic”, s. 104–115.
  4. Benjamin Walter, 2010, Pasaże, tłum. Rolf Tiedermann, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków.
  5. Bødker Mads, 2014, Walking, Sensing, Participation: Three Meditations for Experiential Computing, Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Tel Aviv, Israel, 9–11 czerwca.
  6. Brighenti Andrea Mubi, 2010, Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke–New York.
  7. Burgin Victor, 1996, In/different Spaces: Place and Memory in Visual Culture, University of California Press, Berkeley.
  8. Cameron Carla, Smith Catherine M., Tumilty Steve, Treharne Gareth J., 2014, The Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Mobile Methods for Capturing and Analysing Data about Dog-Walking and Human Health, „New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy”, t. 42, nr 2, s. 163–169.
  9. Carpiano Rchard M., 2009, Come Take a Walk with Me: The ‘Go-Along’ Interview as a Novel Method for Studying the Implications of Place for Health and Well-Being, „Health and Place”, t. 15, s. 263–272.
  10. Castells Manuel, 2013, Władza komunikacji, tłum. Jakub Jedliński, Paweł Tomanek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  11. Certeau Michel, de, 2008, Wynaleźć codzienność. Sztuki działania, tłum. Katarzyna Thiel-Jańczuk, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
  12. Clark Andrew, Emmel Nick, 2010, Realities Toolkit #13: Using Walking Interviews (eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1323/1/13-toolkit-walking-interviews.pdf [15.05.2016]).
  13. Doy Gen, 2005, Picturing the Self. Changing Views of the Subject in Visual Culture, I.B. Tauris, New York.
  14. Emmel Nick, Clark Andrew, 2009, The Methods Used in Connected Lives: Investigating Networks, Neighbourhoods and Communities, NCRM Working Paper. National Centre for Research Methods (http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/800/1/2009_connected_lives_methods_emmel_clark.pdf).
  15. Giddens Anthony, 2006, Nowoczesność i tożsamość. „Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności, tłum. Alina Szulżycka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  16. Guest Greg, Namey Emily E., Mitchell Marilyn L., 2013, Collecting Qualitative Data. A Field Manual for Applied Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
  17. Heath Christian, Hindmarsh Jon, 2002, Analysing Interaction. Video, Ethnography and Situated Conduct, w: Tim May (red.), Qualitative Research in Action, Sage Publications, London.
  18. Henley Paul, 2005, Putting Film to Work: Observational Cinema as Practical Ethnography, w: Sarah Pink, László Kürti, Ana Isabel Afonso (red.), Working Images. Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography, Routledge, London–New York.
  19. Howes David, 2010, Response to Sarah Pink, „Social Anthropology”, t. 18, nr 3, s. 333–336.
  20. Ingild Tim, 2000, The Perception of Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, Routledge, London–New York.
  21. Jones Phil, Bunce Griff, Evans James, Gibbs Hannah, Hein Jane Ricketts, 2008, Exploring Space and Place With Walking Interviews, „Journal of Research Practice”, t. 4, nr 2, s. 1–9.
  22. Kusenbach Margarethe, 2003, Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool, „Ethnography”, t. 4, s. 455–485.
  23. Lynch Kevin, 1990, The Image of the City, The MIT Press, Cambridge–London.
  24. Meyer Kurt, 2008, Rythms, streets, cities, w: Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, Christian Schmid (red.), Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre, Routledge, London–New York.
  25. Mills Kathy, Comber Barbara, Kelly Pippa, 2013, Sensing Place: Embodiment, Sensoriality, Kinesis, and Children behind the Camera, „English Teaching: Practice and Critique September”, t. 12, nr 2, s. 11–27.
  26. Moussaïd Mehdi, Perozo Niriaska, Garnier Simon, Helbing Dirk, Theraulaz Guy, 2010, The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics, „PLoS ONE”, 5(4): e10047 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010047).
  27. Parkin Stephen, Coomber Ross, 2009, Value in the Visual: On Public Injecting, Visual Methods and their Potential for Informing Policy (and Change), „Methodological Innovations Online”, t. 4(2), s. 21–36.
  28. Pasqualino Caterina, 2007, Filming Emotion. The Place of Video in Anthropology, „Visual Anthropology Review”, t. 23, nr 1, s. 84–91.
  29. Pink Sarah, 2006, The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the senses, Routledge, London–New York.
  30. Pink Sarah, 2007, Walking with Video, „Visual Studies”, t. 22, nr 3, s. 240–252.
  31. Pink Sarah, 2010, The Future of Sensory Anthropology / The Anthropology of the Senses, „Social Anthropology”, t. 18, s. 331–333.
  32. Pink Sarah, Leder Mackley Kerstin, 2012, Video and a Sense of the Invisible: Approaching Domestic Energy Consumption through the Sensory Home, „Sociological Research Online”, 17(1) (doi: 10.5153/sro.2583).
  33. Postma Metje, 2006, From Description to Narrative: What’s Left of Ethnography, w: Peter Ian Crawford, Metje Postma (red.), Reflecting Visual Ethnography. Using the Camera in Anthropological Research, P Leiden, Højberg.
  34. Rewers Ewa, 2005, Post-polis. Wstęp do filozofii ponowoczesnego miasta, Universitas, Kraków.
  35. Rogowski Łukasz, 2015, Estetyki lokalności. Miejska ikonosfera w perspektywie zwrotu przestrzennego, w: Jacek Kubera, Łukasz Rogowski (red.), Miasto w oczach ludzi. Wizualność współczesnej ikonosfery miejskiej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych UAM, Poznań.
  36. Rost Mattias, Cramer Henriette, Holmquist Lars Erik, 2011, Mobile Exploration of Geotagged Photos, „Personal and Ubiquitous Computing”, t. 16, nr 6, s. 665–676.
  37. Sheller Mimi, Urry John, 2006, The New Mobilities Paradigm, „Environment and Planning”, t. 38, s. 207–226.
  38. Simmel Georg, 2006, Most i drzwi. Wybór esejów, tłum. Małgorzata Łukasiewicz, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa.
  39. Stalder Felix, 2012, Manuel Castells. Teoria społeczeństwa sieci, tłum. Marek Król, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
  40. Tatarkiewicz Władysław, 1999, Historia filozofii, t. 2, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.