Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
SM baner

Tom 73 Nr 4 (2020): Oligarchia po transformacji

Rosja i jej sąsiedzi

Polityka Turcji w rejonie Morza Czarnego – relacje z Ukrainą a miękkie równoważenie Rosji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/SM.2020.73.4.05
Przesłane: 11 września 2021
Opublikowane: 8 czerwca 2021

Abstrakt

Against the backdrop of Turkish-Russian cooperative rivalry – an ambiguous relationship fraught with strategic competition on the one hand, and driven by cooperation in key areas (energy, defence) on the other, the article surveys the growing interdependencies between Turkey and Ukraine and seeks to answer the question whether closer bonds – political and military – between these two countries could be seen as a strategy of soft balancing against Russia. On a broader level, the article speculates on the complex nature of Turkey-Russia relations, which have become increasingly volatile, transactional, opportunistic and compartmentalized.

Bibliografia

  1. Aktürk Ş., Relations between Russia and Turkey before, during, and after the failed coup of 2016, „Insight Turkey” 2019, vol. 21, No. 4.
  2. Akyuz K., Hess S., Turkey looks East. International leverage and democratic backsliding in a hybrid regime, „Mediterranean Quarterly” 2018, vol. 29, No. 2.
  3. Alemdar A., Ağır sınıf taarruz helikopteri atak-ii’nin motorları Ukrayna’dan gelecek, „Defence Turk” [online], 14 III 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.defenceturk.net/agir-sinif-taarruz-helikopteri-atak-iinin-motorlari-ukraynadan-gelecek>.
  4. Åtland K., Redrawing borders, reshaping orders. Russia’s quest for dominance in the Black Sea region, „European Security” 2021, vol. 30, No. 2.
  5. Aydın M., The long view on Turkish-Russian rivalry and cooperation, The German Marshall Fund of the United States, June 2020 (On Turkey, 5): <https://www.gmfus.org/publications/long-view-turkish-russian-rivalry-and-cooperation> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  6. Aydıntaşbaş A., Hosa J., West wishes: Turkey’s growing relationship with Ukraine, „European Council on Foreign Relations” [online], 12 V 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://ecfr.eu/article/west-wishes-turkeys-growing-relationship-with-ukraine/>.
  7. Bakan Çavuşoğlu: „Ukrayna ve nato arasında devam edecek işbirliği, güçlü ve bağımsız bir Ukrayna için çok önemli”, „Haberler” [online], VII 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.haberler.com/bakan-cavusoglu-ukrayna-ve-nato-arasinda-devam-14252270-haberi/>.
  8. Balance of power. Theory and practice in the 21st century, ed. T. V. Paul, J. Wirtz, M. Forrtmann, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2004.
  9. Bazoğlu Sezer D., Ukraine, Turkey, and the Black Sea Region, „Harvard Ukrainian Studies” 1996, vol. 20.
  10. Begdil B. E., Turkey’s „chronic engine problem” is harming defense projects, warn officials, „Defense News” [online], 26 VI 2020 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2020/06/26/turkeys-chronic-engine-problem-is-harming-defense-projects-warn-officials/>.
  11. Bekdil B. E., Turkey, Ukraine seeking broader space cooperation, „Defense News” [online], 14 XII 2020 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.defensenews.com/space/2020/12/14/turkey-ukraine-seeking-broader-space-cooperation/>.
  12. Çelikpala M., Erşen E., Turkey’s Black Sea predicament. Challenging or accommodating Russia?, „Perceptions. Journal of international affairs” 2018, vol. 23, No. 2.
  13. Červonenko V., Mustafa Džemìlêv: „Z nasolodoû sposterìgaû, âk bìsyt′sâ Kreml′ čerez Tomos”, „BBC News Ukraїna” [online], 18 IX 2018 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-45525505?fbclid=Iwar0ejnvq30fiBwZbkzhchHb8KarsjzWlcsiejv1qeNgdq9_yb6d-xq6XqJg>.
  14. Ceylan T. E., Israel and Turkey. Once comrades now frenemies, „Contemporary Review of the Middle East” 2021, doi: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/23477989211019822?journalCode=cmea> [dostęp: 1 VII 2021].
  15. Dalay G., After the S-400 purchase. Where are Turkish-Russian relations heading?, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 3 IX 2019: <https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/after-the-s-400-purchase-where-are-turkish-russian-relations-heading> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  16. Demirci Z., Dışişleri Bakanı Çavuşoğlu: Kırım Platformuna desteğimizi bugün bir kere daha yineledik, „Anadolu Ajansı” [online], 18 XII 2020 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/disisleri-bakani-cavusoglu-kirim-platformuna-destegimizi-bugun-bir-kere-daha-yineledik/2081611>.
  17. Dursun-Özkanca O., Turkish soft balancing against the EU? An analysis of the prospects for improved transatlantic security relations, „Foreign Policy Analysis” 2017, vol. 13, No. 4.
  18. Egeli S., Making sense of Turkey’s air and missile defense merry-go-round, „All Azimuth” 2018, vol. 8, No. 1.
  19. Erdoğan: nato’nun yüzünden Karadeniz Rus gölü oldu, „SOL” [online], 11 V 2016 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://haber.sol.org.tr/toplum/erdogan-natonun-yuzunden-karadeniz-rus-golu-oldu-155577>.
  20. Ferguson Ch., The strategic use of soft balancing. The normative dimensions of the Chinese-Russian „strategic partnership”, „Journal of Strategic Studies” 2012, vol. 35, No. 2.
  21. Frappi C., The Russo-Turkish entente. A tactical embrace along strategic and geopolitical convergences, [w:] Turkey: towards an Eurasian shift?, ed. V. Talbot, Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, Milano 26 IV 2018: <https://www.ispion-line.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/turkey_report_.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  22. Fukuyama F., Droning on in the Middle East, „American Purpose” [online], 5 IV 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.americanpurpose.com/blog/fukuyama/droning-on/>.
  23. Güger M. B., Türkiye’nin Kırım politikası ve „Kırım Platformu”, „Cumhuriyet” [online], 7 VI 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/turkiyenin-kirim-politikasi-ve-kirim-platformu-1842437>.
  24. Gurganus J., Rumer E., Russia’s global ambitions in perspective, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, February 2019 (Working Paper): <https://carnegieendowment.org/files/RumerGurganus_Perspective_final.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  25. Haferlach L., Tekin F., Wódka J., Friends. Foes. Frenemies? Unpacking the future of EU-Turkey relations, „Futures” 2018, vol. 97.
  26. Hamilton R. E., Mikulska A., Cooperation, competition, and compartmentalization: Russian-Turkish relations and their implications for the West, Foreign Policy Research Institute, April 2021 (Black Sea Strategy Papers): <https://www.fpri.org/article/2021/04/cooperation-competition-and-compartmentalization-russian-turkish-relations-and-their-implications-for-the-west/> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  27. He L., Feng H., If not soft balancing, then what? Reconsidering soft balancing and US policy towards China, „Security Studies” 2008, vol. 17, No. 2.
  28. Hill F., Taşpınar Ö., Turkey and Russia – axis of excluded?, „Survival. Global politics and strategy” 2006, vol. 48, No. 1.
  29. Kaczmarski M., Russia-China relations in the post-crisis international order, Routledge, 2015.
  30. Kelley J., Strategic non-cooperation as soft balancing. Why Iraq was not just about Iraq, „International Politics” 2005, vol. 42.
  31. Khong Y. K., Coping with strategic uncertainty. The role of institutions and soft balancing in Southeast Asia’s post-Cold War strategy, [w:] Rethinking security in East Asia. Identity, power and efficiency, ed. J.-J. Suh, P. J. Katzenstein, A. Carlson, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2004.
  32. Klymenko A., A „Russian lake”: the nine aspects of the current situation in the Black Sea, „Black Sea News” [online], 4 VIII 2019 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.blackseanews.net/en/read/153503>.
  33. Kutlay M., Öniş Z., Turkish foreign policy in a post-western order: strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence?, „International Affairs” 2021, vol. 97, No. 4.
  34. Legucka A., Polityka Rosji w obszarze wschodniego Morza Śródziemnego, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, 22 V 2020 (Biuletyn, 111 (2034)): <https://pism.pl/publikacje/Polityka_Rosji__w_obszarze_wschodniego_Morza_Srodziemnego> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  35. Lubina M., Russia and China. A political marriage of convenience – stable and successful, Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen 2017.
  36. Łoskot-Strachota A., Seroka M., Szpala M., TurkStream na dywersyfikującym się rynku Europy Południowo-Wschodniej, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, 8 IV 2021 (Komentarze OSW, 388): <https://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/komentarze-osw/2021-04-08/turkstream-na-dywersyfikujacym-sie-rynku-europy-poludniowo> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  37. Mahoney J., Schensul D., Historical context and path dependence, [w:] The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis, ed. R. E. Goodin, Ch. Tilly, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
  38. Menkiszak M., Strategiczna kontynuacja, taktyczna zmiana. Polityka bezpieczeństwa europejskiego Rosji, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, październik 2019 (Punkt Widzenia, 76): <https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/pw_76_pl_Strategiczna-kontynuacja_net_0.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  39. Nye J. S., The cooperative rivalry of us-China relations, „Project Syndicate” [online], 6 XI 2018 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-america-relationship-cooperative-rivalry-by-joseph-s--nye-2018-11>.
  40. Oğuzlu T., Turkish foreign policy in a changing world order, „All Azimuth” 2018, vol. 9, No. 1.
  41. Olchowski J., Ukraińsko-turecka rozgrywka z Rosją i Tatarami w tle, Instytut Europy Środkowej, Lublin 29 II 2020 (Komentarz IEŚ, 128 (31/2020)): <https://ies.lublin.pl/komentarze/ukrainsko-turecka-rozgrywka-z-rosja-i-tatarami-w-tle/> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  42. Öniş Z., Yilmaz Ş., Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region, „Third World Quarterly” 2016, vol. 37, No. 1.
  43. „Our primary goal is that the Black Sea continues to be a sea of peace and cooperation”, „Presidency of the Republic of Turkey” [online], 10 IV 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.tccb.gov.tr/en/news/542/126545/-our-primary-goal-is-that-the-black-sea-continues-to-be-a-sea-of-peace-and-cooperation->.
  44. The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis, ed. R. E. Goodin, Ch. Tilly, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
  45. Pape R. A., Soft balancing against the United States, „International Security” 2005, vol. 30, No. 1.
  46. Paul T. V., Introduction. The enduring axioms of balance of power theory and their contemporary relevance, [w:] Balance of power. Theory and practice in the 21st century, ed. T. V. Paul, J. Wirtz, M. Forrtmann, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2004.
  47. Paul T. V., Soft balancing in the age of us primacy, „International Security” 2005, vol. 30, No. 1.
  48. Petersen M., The naval power shift in the Black Sea, „War on the Rocks” [online], 9 I 2019 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/the-naval-power-shift-in-the-black-sea/>.
  49. Petrov G., Èrdogan rеšil vozdejstvovat′ na Moskvu čеrеz Kiev. Turciâ razygryvaet ukrainskuû kartu v bol′šoj igre s Rossiej, „Nezavisimaâ gazeta” [online], 11 IV 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.ng.ru/world/2021-04-11/1_8125_turkey.html>.
  50. Pierini M., Russia’s posture in the Mediterranean. Implications for NATO and Europe, Carnegie Europe, June 2021: <https://carnegieendowment.org/files/2021-06-08_Pierini_RussiaMed_final.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  51. Polityuk P., Gumrukcu T., Turkey’s Erdogan calls for end to „worrying” developments in eastern Ukraine, offers support, „Reuters” [online], 10 IV 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukrainian-turkish-presidents-hold-talks-amid-donbass-tensions-with-russia-2021-04-10/>.
  52. Rethinking security in East Asia. Identity, power and efficiency, ed. J.-J. Suh, P. J. Katzenstein, A. Carlson, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2004.
  53. Russia warns Turkey over ties with Ukraine, „Reuters” [online], 24 v 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-warns-turkey-over-ties-with-ukraine-2021-05-24/>.
  54. Saltzman I. Z., Securitizing balance of power theory. A polymorphic reconceptualization, Lexington Books, Lanham 2011.
  55. Schaefer M. E., Poffenbarger J. G., The formation of the BRICS and its implication for the United States: Emerging together, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2014.
  56. Shlykov P., Russian-Turkish relations in the wider Back Sea region. Cooperation and competition, „Perceptions. Journal of international affairs” 2018, vol. 23, No. 2.
  57. Stoner K. E., Russia resurrected. Its power and purpose in a new global order, Oxford University Press, 2020.
  58. Strachota K., Wilk A., S-400 dla Turcji. Eskalacja kryzysu w stosunkach turecko-amerykańskich, Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, 12 VI 2019 (Komentarze OSW, 305): <https://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/komentarze-osw/2019-06-12/s-400-dla-turcji-eskalacja-kryzysu-w-stosunkach-turecko> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  59. Sukiennik J., Path dependence – proces przekształceń instytucjonalnych, „Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” 2017, nr 493.
  60. Szeligowski D., Nowa strategia bezpieczeństwa narodowego Ukrainy, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, 30 X 2020 (Biuletyn, 219 (2151)): <https://pism.pl/publikacje/Nowa_strategia_bezpieczenstwa_narodowego_Ukrainy> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  61. Szumer M., Turcja tęskni za imperium, „Gazeta Wyborcza”, 1 II 2018.
  62. Taliaferro J. W., Defending frenemies. Alliances, politics, and nuclear nonproliferation in us foreign policy, Oxford University Press, New York 2019.
  63. Temiz K., Türkiye-Çin ilişkileri, Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfi, Nisan 2017 (Analiz, 196): <https://setav.org/assets/uploads/2017/04/trcin.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  64. Temizer M., Russian share of Turkish gas imports falls as LNG rises, „Anadolu Agency” [online], 5 VI 2020 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/russian-share-of-turkish-gas-imports-falls-as-lng-rises/1866403>.
  65. Turkey downing of Russia jet „stab in the back” – Putin, „BBC” [online], 24 XI 2015 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34913173>.
  66. Turkey: towards an Eurasian shift?, ed. V. Talbot, Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, Milano 26 IV 2018: <https://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/turkey_report_.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  67. Türkiye ile Ukrayna arasında 20 maddelik ortak bildiri, „TRT Haber” [online], 10 IV 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/turkiye-ile-ukrayna-arasinda-20-maddelik-ortak-bildiri-571807.html>.
  68. Ukrayna: Türkiye ile uzaya roket fırlatabiliriz, „Ensonhaber” [online], 21 VI 2021 [dostęp: 21 VI 2021]: <https://www.ensonhaber.com/teknoloji/ukrayna-turkiye-ile-uzaya-roket-firlatabiliriz>.
  69. Vorotnyuk M., Foreign policy audit. Ukraine-Turkey, Institute of World Policy, Kyiv 2016 (Discussion Paper): <http://prismua.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Aud_Ukr_Turk_01_32_eng-2.pdf> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  70. Wasilewski K., Amerykańskie sankcje na Turcję, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, 15 XII 2020 (Komentarz, 93/2020): <https://www.pism.pl/publikacje/Amerykanskie_sankcje_na_Turcje> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  71. Whitaker B. E., Soft balancing among weak states? Evidence from Africa, „International Affairs” 2010, vol. 86.
  72. Włodkowska-Bagan A., Polityka Rosji na obszarze poradzieckim, „Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny” 2017, t. 14, nr 3.
  73. Wódka J., Polityka zagraniczna średniej potęgi. Turcja jako studium przypadku, Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN, Warszawa 2018.
  74. Yavuz T., Ukraine eyes more joint defense projects with Turkey, „Anadolu Ajansı” [online], 3 II 2021 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/ukraine-eyes-more-joint-defense-projects-with-turkey/2132853>.
  75. Yeşiltaş M., Soft balancing in Turkish foreign policy: the case of the 2003 Iraq war, „Perceptions. Journal of international affairs” 2009, vol. 14.
  76. Yinanç B., Did Erdoğan say no to Putin on church issue?, „Hürriyet Daily News” [online], 7 I 2019 [dostęp: 14 VI 2021]: <https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/opinion/barcin-yinanc/did-erdogan-say-no-to-putin-on-church-issue-140314>.
  77. Zaniewicz M., Nowa strategia obronna Ukrainy, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, 5 V 2021 (Biuletyn, 91 (1787)): <https://pism.pl/publikacje/Nowa_strategia_obronna_Ukrainy> [dostęp: 14 VI 2021].
  78. Zarakol A., Problem areas for the new Turkish foreign policy, „Nationalities Papers. The journal of nationalism and ethnicity” 2012, vol. 40, No. 5.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.