Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 71 No. 2 (2018): Jak mówić o Unii Europejskiej?

In Search of a New Story about Europe

Hardly Seen and Rarely Heard? European Commission Generated Presence on Polish Social Media

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/SM.2018.71.2.08
Submitted: January 15, 2020
Published: 2018-06-29

Abstract

This paper discusses the importance of social media as a new channel to communicate European Union activities and policies to the general public. The author examines the fast-growing position of social platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, in the media ecosystem. Their opinion making and agenda setting roles are discussed in the context of deep mediatisation theory – a relatively new, interdisciplinary concept, combining the perspectives of sociology and media sciences. Based on analysis of the social media activity of the European Commission Representation in Poland, the author examines the Commission’s presence in the new channels, within the framework of a new corporate communication campaign, launched in September 2016. The results of the research indicate that that efforts undertaken so far, contrary to intuition, have not yielded a substantial increase in social media activity. However, some promising elements were detected: the quality of users’ engagement with the content published by the European Commission has improved.

References

  1. Boomgarden H.G. et al., Across Time and Space: Explaining Variation in News Coverage of the European Union, “European Journal of Political Research” 2013, No. 52.
  2. Couldry N., Hepp A., The Mediated Construction of Reality, Polity Press, Cambridge 2017.
  3. de Vreese C., Communicating Europe, Foreign Policy Centre, British Council Brussels, 2003, 8, .
  4. Desmet P., Spanje J. van, de Vreese C., Discussing the Democratic Deficit: Effects of Media and Interpersonal Communication on Satisfaction with Democracy in the European Union, “International Journal of Communication” 2015, No. 9.
  5. Jurczyszyn Ł., Stefański A., Informacja o wynikach badania jakościowego wśród młodzieży na temat: “Różnić się nie oznacza nienawidzić się. Mniej wrogości poprzez wiedzę o prawach człowieka i dialog”, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich, 2017, <http://www.rpo.gov.pl/sites/default/files/Raport_z_badan_RPO_Roznic_sie_nie_znaczy_nienawidzic.pdf>.
  6. Lindgren S., Digital Media & Society, Sage, London 2017.
  7. Meyer R., Mark Zuckerberg Says He’s Not Resigning, “The Atlantic”, 9 IV 2018, <https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/04/mark-zuckerberg-atlantic-exclusive/557489>.
  8. Niklewicz K., We Need to Talk about the EU: European Political Advertising in the Post-Truth Era, Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, Brussels 2017.
  9. Popielawska J., Szyszko J., Narracja o Unii Europejskiej, Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego, December 2017, <http://www.batory.org.pl/upload/files/Programy%20operacyjne/Otwarta%20Europa/Czesc%201%20-%20Narracja%20o%20UE.pdf>.
  10. Shearer E., Gottfried J., News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017, Pew Research Center, September 2017.
  11. Stroeker N., van der Graaf A., Buiskool B.-J., Communicating “Europe” to Its Citizens: State of Affairs and Prospects, European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policy, November 2014.
  12. Taylor P., European History Hovers Close to Reverse Gear, Reuters, <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-history-analysis-idUSKCN0Z5087>.
  13. Valentini C., Political Public Relations in the European Union: EU Reputation and Relationship Management Under Scrutiny, “Public Relations Journal” 2013, Vol. 7, No. 4.
  14. Vliegenthart R. et al., News Coverage and Support for European Integration 1990−2006, “International Journal of Public Opinion Research” 2008, Vol. 20, No. 4.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.