Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Civitas baner

Tom 23 (2018): BESTIARIUM

Forum

Autonomous Weapon Systems, Asymmetrical Warfare, and Myth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2018.23.10
Przesłane: 15 grudnia 2019
Opublikowane: 28 grudnia 2018

Abstrakt

Predictions about autonomous weapon systems (AWS) are typically thought to channel fears that drove all the myths about intelligence embodied in matter. One of these is the idea that the technology can get out of control and ultimately lead to horrific consequences, as is the case in Mary Shelley’s classic Frankenstein. Given this, predictions about AWS are sometimes dismissed as science-fiction fear-mongering. This paper considers several analogies between AWS and other weapon systems and ultimately offers an argument that nuclear weapons and their effect on the development of modern asymmetrical warfare are the best analogy to the introduction of AWS. The final section focuses on this analogy and offers speculations about the likely consequences of AWS being hacked. These speculations tacitly draw on myths and tropes about technology and AI from popular fiction, such as Frankenstein, to project a convincing model of the risks and benefi ts of AWS deployment.

Bibliografia

  1. Arkin R.C.: The Case for Ethical Autonomy in Unmanned Systems, „Journal of Military Ethics” 2010, t. 9, nr 4.
  2. Brodie B., Brodie F.M.: From Crossbow to H-bomb, Indiana University Press, Bloomington 1973.
  3. Fishman B.H.: The Master Plan. ISIS, al-Qaeda, and the Jihadi Strategy for Final Victory, Yale University Press, New Haven 2016.
  4. Gooday G.: Domesticating Electricity. Technology, Uncertainty and Gender, 1880–1914, Routledge, London 2015.
  5. Klincewicz M.: Autonomous Weapon Systems, The Frame Problem, and Computer Security, „Journal of Military Ethics” 2015, t. 14, nr 2.
  6. Lasen A.: History Repeating? A Comparison of the Launch and Uses of Fixed and Mobile Phones, w: L. Hamill, A. Lasen (red.): Mobile World. Past, Present and Future, Springer, London 2005.
  7. Melander E. et al.: Are ‘New Wars’ More Atrocious? Battle Severity, Civilians Killed and Forced Migration Before and After the End of the Cold War, „European Journal of International Relations” 2009, t. 15, nr 3.
  8. Morris C.W.: A Contractarian Defense of Nuclear Deterrence, „Ethics” 1985, t. 95, nr 3.
  9. Roff H.M. and Danks D.: Trust but Verify: The difficulty of trusting autonomous weapons systems, „Journal of Military Ethics” 2018, t. 17, nr 1.
  10. Schmitt M.N.: Asymmetrical Warfare and International Humanitarian Law, w: W. Heintschel von Heinegg, V. Epping (red.): International Humanitarian Law Facing New Challenges, Springer, Berlin 2007.
  11. Thornton R.: Asymmetric Warfare. Threat and Response in the 21st Century, Polity, Cambridge UK 2007.
  12. Umbrello S., Torres P, and De Bellis A.F.: The future of war: could lethal autonomous weapons make conflict more ethical? „AI & Society” 2019.
  13. Van Evera S.: The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War, „International Security” 1984, t. 9, nr 1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.