Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
KiS baner

Vol. 65 No. 1 (2021): THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Articles and essays

The Social Experiment of Remote Work Forced by the Pandemic from a Qualitative Research Perspective

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.2
Submitted: June 21, 2021
Published: March 22, 2021

Abstract

This paper has two principal goals. The first is reflection over the available source literature, indicating the scant interest in it in the Polish social sciences, and in sociology in particular. The second goal is to present the findings from the first round of qualitative research conducted during lockdown, focusing on the experiences of people working remotely. The analyses of the material accumulated focused on how remote work was imagined prior to the pandemic, on the shock of transition to working remotely, on how a new rhythm took shape in the context of lifestyles, and on a comprehensive appraisal of the remote work experience, including prospects for the future. The findings indicate that despite the dramatic circumstances behind the imposition of remote working and the enormous difficulties experienced by the respondents, they are openminded regarding various options for continuing work in a remote mode. At the same time it proved pertinent to supplement boundary theory as the theoretical interpretative framework with a perspective of the respondents’ lifestyles and current place in life (the life-cycle effect), allowing for a better understanding of the respondents’ experiences and outlining prospects for rewording the schematic representations of this social phenomenon.

References

  1. Ammons, Samantha K., William T. Markham. 2004. “Working at Home: Experiences of Skilled White Collar Workers.” Sociological Spectrum 24(2): 191–238 (https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170490271744).
  2. Archibald, Mandy M., Rachel C. Ambagtsheer, Mavourneen G. Casey, Michael Lawless. 2019. “Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–8 (https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596).
  3. Ashforth, Blake E., Glen E. Kreiner, Mel Fugate. 2000. “All in a Day’s Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions.” Academy of Management Review 25(3): 472–491 (https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3363315).
  4. Bailey, Diane E., Nancy B. Kurland. 2002. “A Review of Telework Research: Findings, New Directions, and Lessons for the Study of Modern Work.” Journal of Organizational Behavior (https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144).
  5. Cross, Thomas B., Marjorie Raizman. 1986. Telecommuting: The Future Technology of Work. Homewood: Dow Jones Irwin, IL.
  6. Delanoeije, Joni, Marijke Verbruggen, Lynn Germeys. 2019. “Boundary Role Transitions: A Day-to-Day Approach to Explain the Effects of Home-Based Telework on Work-to-Home Conflict and Home-to-Work Conflict.” Human Relations 72(12): 1843–1868 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823071).
  7. Ellison, Nicole B. 1999. “Social Impacts—New Perspectives on Telework.” Social Science Computer Review 17(3): 338–356 (https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914742.n29).
  8. Felstead, Alan, Nick Jewson. 2000. In Work, at Home: Towards an Understanding of Homeworking. London: Routledge (https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018965).
  9. Felstead, Alan, Nick Jewson, Annie Phizacklea, Sally Walters, Alan Felstead, Nick Jewson, Annie Phizacklea, Sally Walters. 2001. “Working at Home: Statistical Evidence for Seven Key Hypotheses.” Work Employment and Society 15(2): 215–231 (https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170122118922).
  10. Gądecki, Jacek, Marcin Jewdokimow, Magdalena Żadkowska. 2017. Tu się pracuje! Socjologiczne studium pracy zawodowej prowadzonej w domu na zasadach telepracy. Kraków: Libron–Filip Lohner.
  11. Gądecki, Jacek, Magdalena Żadkowska. 2016. “Praktyki telepracowników. Negocjowanie granic między domem a pracą.” In: Marcin Jewdokimow, Magdalena Łukasiuk (eds.). Socjologia zamieszkiwania. Narracje, dyfuzje, interwencje. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego: 63–86.
  12. Gajendran, Ravi S., David A. Harrison. 2007. “The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown about Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92(6): 1524–1541 (https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524).
  13. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press (https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343722).
  14. Hamblin, Heather. 1995. “Employees’ Perspectives on One Dimension of Labour Flexibility: Working at a Distance.” Work Employment & Society 9(3): 473–498 (https://doi.org/10.1177/095001709593003).
  15. Huws, Ursula. 2003. The Making of a Cybertariat: Virtual Work in a Real World. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  16. Huws, Ursula. 2014. Labor in the Global Digital Economy. New York: NYU Press (http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1287j8b).
  17. Huws, Ursula, Werner B. Korte, Simon Robinson. 1992. Telework: Towards the Elusive Office. Chichester, UK: Wiley Series in Information Systems.
  18. Jackson, Paul J., Jos M. van der Wielen (eds.). 2002. Teleworking: International Perspectives. From Telecommuting to the Virtual Organisation. London–New York: Routledge.
  19. Javornik, Jana, Anna Kurowska. 2017. “Work and Care Opportunities under Different Parental Leave Systems: Gender and Class Inequalities in Northern Europe.” Social Policy & Administration 51(4): 617–37 (https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12316).
  20. Jeran, Agnieszka. 2016. “Praca zdalna jako źródło problemów realizacji funkcji pracy.” Opuscula Sociologica 2(16): 49–62 (https://doi.org/10.18276/os.2016.2-04).
  21. Kim, Jaeseung, Julia R. Henly, Lonnie M. Golden, Susan J. Lambert. 2020. “Workplace Flexibility and Worker Well-Being by Gender.” Journal of Marriage and Family 82(3): 892–910 (https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12633).
  22. Kotnarowski, Michał. 2006. “Telepraca — raport z badania 1000 przedsiębiorstw.” Sopot: PBS DGA.
  23. Mergener, Alexandra. 2020. “Occupational Access to the Home Office: A Task-Based Approach to Explaining Unequal Opportunities in Home Office Access.” Kolner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 72: 511–534 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-020-00669-0).
  24. Messenger, Jon C. 2019. “Telework in the 21st Century.” In: Jon C. Messenger (ed.). Telework in the 21st Century: An Evolutionary Perspective, Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing (https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903751).
  25. Mirchandani, Kiran. 1998. “Protecting the Boundary: Teleworker Insights on the Expansive Concept of ‘Work’.” Gender and Society 12(2): 168–187 (https://doi.org/10.1177/089124398012002004).
  26. Mirchandani, Kiran. 1999. “Legitimizing Work: Telework and the Gendered Reification of the Work–Nonwork Dichotomy.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology / Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’Anthropologie 36(1): 87–107.
  27. Mokhtarian, Patricia L., Ilan Salomon, Sangho Choo. 2005. “Measuring the Measurable: Why Can’t We Agree on the Number of Telecommuters in the U.S.?” Quality and Quantity (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-6790-z).
  28. Mokhtarian, Patricia L., Koji Sato. 1994. “A Comparison of the Policy, Social, and Cultural Contexts for Telecommuting in Japan and The United States.” Social Science Computer Review 12(4): 641–658 (https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939401200412).
  29. Mrozowicki, Adam. 2019. “Sociology of Work in Poland.” In: Paul Steward, Jean-Pierre Durand, Maria-Magdalena Richea (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of the Sociology of Work in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan: 253–285.
  30. Nilles, Jack M., F. Roy Carlson, Paul Gray, Gerhard J. Hanneman. 1976. The Telecommunications-Transportation Tradeoff. Options for Tomorrow. New York: John Wiley.
  31. Shin, Bongsik, Omar A. El Sawy, Olivia R. Liu Sheng, Kunihiko Higa. 2000. “Telework: Existing Research and Future Directions.” Electronic Commerce 10(2): 85–101 (https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1002_2).
  32. Siciński, Andrzej. 2002. “Styl życia.” In: Encyklopedia socjologii, vol. 1. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
  33. Sostero, Matteo, Santo Milasi, John Hurley, Enrique Fernandez-Macías, Martina Bisello. 2020. Teleworkability and the COVID-19 Crisis: A New Digital Divide? Seville: European Commission.
  34. Spytek-Bandurska, Grażyna. 2015. Telepraca jako nietypowa forma zatrudnienia w Polsce. Aspekty prawne i społeczne. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR.
  35. Steward, Barbara. 2000. “Changing Times—The Meaning, Measurement and Use of Time in teleworking.” Time & Society 9(1): 57–74 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x00009001004).
  36. Suwada, Katarzyna. 2021. Parenting and Work in Poland. A Gender Studies Perspective. Springer International Publishing.
  37. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. London: Allen Lane an imprint of Penguin Books.
  38. Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The Third Wave. New York: Morrow.
  39. Watson Fritz, Mary Elizabeth, Sridhar Narasimhan. 1995. “Toward a Telework Taxonomy and Test for Suitability: A Synthesis of the Literature.” Group Decision and Negotiation 4: 311–334.
  40. Wellman, Barry, Janet Salaff, Dimitrina Dimitrova, Laura Garton, Milena Gulia, Caroline Haythornthwaite. 1996. “Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 213–238 (https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.213).
  41. Woerness, Kari. 1978. “The Invisible Welfare State: Women’s Work at Home.” Acta Sociologica 21: 193–207.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.