Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 69 No. 4 (2025): Symbolic Boundaries in Social Communication

Articles and essays

Green Hydrogen: Energy Justice Through the Lens of Press Discourse Analysis, 2016–2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2025.69.4.4
Submitted: January 8, 2025
Published: December 12, 2025

Abstract

In the face of the global challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the countries of the European Union are striving to achieve emission neutrality, among other strategies, by introducing hydrogen technologies in the energy diversification process and by implementing a just transition. This article is based on an analysis of press discourse on hydrogen in 2016–2022, using Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) methods and qualitative content analysis based on framing analysis. The collected material comprised 1,896 articles (totaling approximately some 1.75 million words) from the highest-circulation press in its category on the Polish market. The analysis indicates the dominance of expert and specialist groups in shaping the hydrogen narrative. It reveals that the discourse has been taken over by representatives of big business, with only marginal participation by the academic community, local government, and the third sector—which may hinder the realization of the just transition. The authority of science is exploited to conceal the rhetorical tools applied in expert discourse. This implies the need to critically rethink communication strategies on innovative technologies and to engage diverse sections of society in dialogue on the energy transition, of which energy justice is a component in the process of change towards a post-carbon society.

References

  • Baker Paul, 2006, Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis, Continuum, London–New York.
  • Baker Paul, Gabrielatos Costas, Khosravinik Majid, Mcenery Tony, Wodak Ruth, 2008, A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, „Discourse & Society”, t. 19(3), s. 273–306 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962).
  • Beck Ulrich, 1999, World Risk Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Bondi Marina, Cacchiani Silvia, Mazzi Davide (red.), 2015, Discourse In and Through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.
  • Calsamiglia Helena, van Dijk Teun A., 2004, Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome, „Discourse & Society”, t. 15(4), s. 369–389 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926 504043705).
  • Cha J. Mijin, 2020, A Just Transition for Whom? Politics, Contestation, and Social Identity in the Disruption of Coal in the Powder River Basin, „Energy Research and Social Science”, t 69: 101657 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101657).
  • Emodi Nnaemeka Vincent, Lovell Heather, Levitt Cilinton, Franklin Evan, 2021, A Systematic Literature Review of Societal Acceptance and Stakeholders’ Perception of Hydrogen Technologies, „International Journal of Hydrogen Energy”, t. 46(60): 30669–30697 (https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.212).
  • Gabrielatos Costas, Baker Paul, 2008, Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005, „Journal of English Linguistics”, t. 36(1), s. 5–38 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247).
  • Gajda Stanisław, 1999, Współczesny polski dyskurs naukowy, w: Stanisław Gajda (red.), Dyskurs naukowy — tradycja i zmiana, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole.
  • Gillings Mathew, Mautner Gerlinde, Baker Paul, 2023, Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Iwińska Katarzyna, Lis Aleksandra, Mączka Krzysztof, 2021, From Framework to Boundary Object? Reviewing Gaps and Critical Trends in Global Energy Justice Research, „Energy Research & Social Science”, t. 79: 102191 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102191).
  • Jenkins Kirsten, McCauley Darren, Heffron Raphael, Stephan Hannes, Rehner Robert, 2016, Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review, „Energy Research & Social Science”, t. 11, s. 174–182.
  • Karakislak Irmak, Hildebrand Jan, Schweizer-Ries Petra, 2023, Exploring the Interaction between Social Norms and Perceived Justice of Wind Energy Projects: A Qualitative Analysis, „Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning”, t. 25(2), s. 155–168 (https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2020631).
  • Kilgarriff Adam, Baisa Vít, Bušta Jan, Jakubícek Miloš, Kovár Vojtech, Michelfeit Jan, Rychlý Pavel, Suchomel Vít, 2014, The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on, „Lexicography”, t. 1(1), s. 7––36 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9).
  • Lozano Lina Lopez, Bharadwaj Bishal, de Sales Alain, Kambo Amrita, Ashworth Peta, 2022, Societal Acceptance of Hydrogen for Domestic and Export Applications in Australia, „Inter-national Journal of Hydrogen Energy”, t. 47 (67), s. 28806–28818 (https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.209).
  • Mączka Krzysztof, Lis-Plesińska Aleksandra, Iwińska Katarzyna, 2023, Epistemic Justice Impossible? Expert Perceptions of the Participatory Monitoring of Geo-Energy Projects in Poland, „Energy Research & Social Science”, t. 102: 103154 (https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.erss.2023.103154).
  • McCauley Darren, Ramasar Vasna, Heffron Raphael J., Sovacool Benjamin K., Mebratu Desta, Mundaca Luis, 2019, Energy Justice in the Transition to Low Carbon Energy Systems: Exploring Key Themes in Interdisciplinary Research, „Applied Energy”, t. 233–234, s. 916––921.
  • Mouffe Chantal, 2015, Agonistyka. Polityczne myślenie o świecie, tłum. Barbara Szelewa, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa.
  • Müller Franziska, Tunn Johanna, Kalt Tobias, 2022, Hydrogen Justice, „Environmental Research Letters”, t. 17(11): 115006 (https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac991a). Rychlý Pavel, 2008, A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score, w: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2008, 6–9.
  • Sadat-Razavi Pantea, Karakislak Irmak, Hildebrand Jan, 2025, German Media Discourses and Public Perceptions on Hydrogen Imports: An Energy Justice Perspective, „Energy Technology”, t. 13(2) (https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202301000).
  • Scollon Ron, Scollon Suzanne W., 1995, Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Scovell Mitchell D., 2022, Explaining Hydrogen Energy Technology Acceptance: A Critical Review, „International Journal of Hydrogen Energy”, t. 47(19), s. 10441–10459 (https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.099).
  • Stark Anthony, Gale Fred, Murphy-Gregory Hannah, 2023, Just Transitions’ Meanings: A Systematic Review, „Society & Natural Resources”, t. 36(10), s. 1277–1297.
  • Szulecki Kacper, Overland Indra, 2020, Energy Democracy as a Process, an Outcome and a Goal: A Conceptual Review, „Energy Research & Social Science”, t. 69: 101768.
  • Tarasek Ewa, 2015, Mechanizmy retoryczne w popularyzacji naukowej, w: Maria Załęska (red.), Retoryka w komunikacji specjalistycznej, Polskie Towarzystwo Retoryczne–Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa.
  • Tarasova Ekatierina, 2024, Multiple Just Transitions? A Study of How a Just Transition Is Envisioned in Poland, „Energy Policy”, t. 194: 114322 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2024.114322).
  • Troszyński Marek, 2024, Badania dyskursu wspomagane korpusowo (CADS) jako wsparcie jakościowej analizy treści. Studium przypadku wykorzystania programu SketchEngine w badaniach dyskursu, „Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, t. 20(4), s. 44–67 (https://doi.org/10.18778/ 1733-8069.20.4.03).
  • Weingart Peter, Joubert Marina, Connoway Karien, 2021, Public Engagement with Science—Origins, Motives and Impact in Academic Literature and Science Policy, PLoS ONE, t. 19(6): e0306474 (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254201).
  • Załęska Maria, 2015, Retoryka a wiedza. Komunikacja niespecjalistyczna i specjalistyczna, w: Maria Załęska (red.), Retoryka w komunikacji specjalistycznej, Polskie Towarzystwo Retoryczne–Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.