Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
SM baner

Tom 73 Nr 3 (2020): Westlessness czyli zmierzch Zachodu 2.0?

Westlessness czyli zmierzch Zachodu 2.0?

„I did it my way”: Czy to koniec współpracy Zjednoczonego Królestwa i Unii Europejskiej w sprawach zagranicznych, bezpieczeństwa i obrony?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/SM.2020.73.3.11
Przesłane: 4 czerwca 2021
Opublikowane: 30 marca 2021

Abstrakt

31 December 2020 marks end of the “transition period” indicated in the Agreement on the Withdrawal of  the  United Kingdom from the European Union. Until the end of this period, the subject of future cooperation in foreign affairs, security and defence has not been negotiated within the BREXIT negotiations. It results in lack of its elaboration in a form of a written agreement on future relations between both Parties in this area. The main objective of this publication is to discuss cooperation between the United Kingdom and the EU in foreign affairs, security and defence as of 1 January 2021, following the end of “transition period” stipulated in the Agreement, considering that it has not been negotiated between the Parties. In this publication, the author discusses negotiation strategy adopted by the United Kingdom, the EU proposal of regulating future relations in foreign affairs, defence and security, as well as presents the forms of cooperation with third states applied so far by the EU. The publication indicates the impact of the BREXIT for the future cooperation in foreign affairs, defence and security. The author argues that the strategy of negotiation adopted by the United Kingdom on future cooperation in the foreign affairs, defence and security was well planned, and does not constitute an obstacle for deepening the future relations between the United Kingdom and the EU.

Bibliografia

  1. Baffey D., What is Galileo and why are the UK and EU arguing about it?, “The Guardian” [online], 25 V 2018 [dostęp: 10 XII 2020], dostępny w internecie: <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/may/25/what-is-galileo-and-why-are-the-uk-and-eu-arguing-about-it>.
  2. Bond I., British foreign policy after Brexit: hand in hand?, Centre for European Reform, CER Bulletin 2018, issue 119.
  3. Bond I., Post-Brexit foreign, security and defence co-operation: We don’t want to talk about it. Centre for European Reform, November 2020, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 30 III 2021]: <https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/pbrief_brexit_forpol_26.11.20.pdf>.
  4. Dumoulin A., Gros-Verheyde N., La politique europeene de securite et de defense commune. Editions du Villard Le Devoluy, Bruxelles 2017.
  5. Fiszer J., Perspektywy Unii Europejskiej po Brexicie i jej rola w nowym ładzie europejskim, Zakład Europeistyki ISP PAN, „Biuletyn Analiz i Opinii” 2017, nr 04.
  6. Hamilton D. S., US and EU Perspectives on their own dense, yet non-existent “Strategic Partnership”, [w:] Strategic partnership as an instrument of EU foreign policy, Workshop Report, November 2015, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 11 XII 2020]: <http://www.thomasrenard.eu/uploads/6/3/5/8/6358199/strategic-partnership-workshop-report-final.pdf>.
  7. Hillion Ch., Adaptation for autonomy? Candidates for EU membership and the CFSP, “Global Affairs” 2017, vol. 3, issue 3.
  8. Johnson B., Przemowa na Konferencji Bezpieczeństwa w Monachium 19 lutego 2021 r., dostępna w internecie [dostęp: 14 IV 2021]: <https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-at-the-munich-security-conference-19-february-2021>.
  9. Lain S., Nouwens V., The consequences of brexit for european defence and security, April 2017, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 2 II 2021]: <https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/201704_08_rusi-fes_brexit_defence_and_security_lain_and_nouwens.pdf>.
  10. Leckey T., Change of command ceremony held at Camp Butmir, European Union Force in BiH, komunikat prasowy, 26 VI 2019, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 10 XII 2020]: <http://www.euforbih.org/eufor/index.php/press-corner/press-statements/2519-change-of-command-ceremony-at-camp-butmir>.
  11. Lehne S., Rivals or partners? The EU–UK foreign policy relationship after brexit, Carnegie Europe, 30 III 2021, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 30 III 2021]: <https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/03/30/rivals-or-partners-eu-uk-foreign-policy-relationship-after-brexit-pub-84197>.
  12. Martill B., Hard bargaining dies hard; the cultural factors behind Britain’s ill-suited Brexit negotiation strategy, LSE British Politics and Policy, 19 X 2020.
  13. May T., Przemowa 17 I 2017, dostępna w internecie [dostęp: 8 IV 2021]: <https://time.com/4636141/theresa-may-brexit-speech-transcript/>.
  14. May T., Przemowa na konferencji Bezpieczeństwa w Monachium 17 II 2018, dostępna w internecie [dostęp: 10 XII 2020]: <https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-at-munich-security-conference-17-february-2018>.
  15. May T., Przemowa na temat brexitu, 25 IV 2016, dostępna w internecie [dostęp: 13 III 2021]: <http://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2016/04/theresa-mays-speech-on-Brexit-full-text.html>.
  16. May T., The future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, Policy paper, 12 VII 2018, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 13 ii 2021]: <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-future-relationship-between-the-united-kingdom-and-the-european-union>.
  17. Naert F., The use of the CFSP legal basis for EU international agreements in combination with other legal bases, [w:] The EU as a global actor – bridging legal theory and practic, eds J. Czuczai, F. Naert, Brill NV 2017.
  18. Oleksiejuk M., The impacts of Brexit on the security and the defence industry in the European Union and the United Kingdom, 21 IV 2020, dostępny
  19. w internecie [dostęp: 10 XII 2020]: <https://warsawinstitute.org/impacts-brexit-security-defence-industry-european-union-united-kingdom/>.
  20. Raab D., Global Britain is leading the world as a force for good, “Sunday Telegraph”, 23 IX 2019, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 9 XII 2020]: .
  21. Shea J., European defence after brexit. A plus or a minus? “European View” 2020, vol. 19, issue 1.
  22. Tardy T., CDSP: getting third states on board, European Union Institute for Security Studies, 7 III 2014 [dostęp: 13 XII 2020], dostępny w internecie: <https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/csdp-getting-third-states-board>.
  23. Task Force (S. Abrial, P. Westmacott i in), Toward a future EU–UK relationship in foreign policy and defense, Atlantic Council Europe Center Report, February 2021.
  24. Whitman R. G., Missing in action: The EU–UK foreign, security and defence policy relationship after Brexit, Wilfired Martens Centre for European Studies, “European View” 2020, vol. 19(2).
  25. Wintour P., Boffey D., UK insists it will not grant EU ambassador full diplomatic status, “The Guardian” [online], 21 I 2021, [dostęp: 1 II 2021], dostępny w internecie: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/21/uk-insists-it-will-not-grant-eu-ambassador-full-diplomatic-status>.
  26. Wither J. K., A secure Brexit? UK security and defense and the decision to leave the European Union, George C. Marshall European Center For Security Studies, “Security Insights”, no. 18, April 2017, dostępny w internecie [dostęp: 13 III 2021]: <https://www.marshallcenter.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-10/SecurityInsights_18.pdf>.
  27. Wright G., UK–EU future relationship. Defence and security cooperation, The Institute for Government, February 2020.
  28. Zięba R., Teoria Bezpieczeństwa, [w:] Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, red. R. Zięba, S. Bieleń, J. Zając, Wydawnictwo Wydziału Dziennikarstwa i Nauk Politycznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2015.
  29. Zięba R., The Euro-Atlantic security system in the 21st century. From cooperation to crisis, Springer International Publishing, New York 2018, (Global Power Shift).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.