Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
SP baner

Vol. 47 No. 4 (2019)

Political thought

Political Responses to the Extreme Right in Poland. Motivations and Constraints for Collaboration in the Executive Arena

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2019.47.4.03
Submitted: April 20, 2020
Published: December 27, 2019

Abstract

The aim of the article is to indicate potential causes for formation of a government coalition with the extreme right-wing League of Polish Families (LPR) in Poland in 2006. The aim is to determine the motivation of the right-wing mainstream Law and Justice party to cooperate with LPR, but also to indicate potential reasons why the coalition was not concluded until nine months after the elections. The goal is therefore to highlight potential constraints in the formation of the coalition. The analysis uses theories of coalition formation based on the rational choice paradigm (office, policy and vote) combined with an empirical approach to coalition research, with particular emphasis on factors such as the structure of competition in the party system and the internal dynamics of parties. The starting point for this analysis is the result of research on the causes of cabinet collaboration with the extreme right in Western Europe. The aim is to indicate whether the motivations for forming a coalition with the extreme right in Poland are based on similar premises and mechanisms. The analysis combines the deductive approach resulting from the theory of coalition formation with the inductive analysis of facts and factors that accompanied the formation of the coalition. In order to achieve the assumed goals, the article uses quantitative and qualitative methods and systemic analysis.

References

  1. Albertazzi D., Mueller S., Populism and Liberal Democracy: Populists in Government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland, “Government and Opposition” 2013, Vol. 48, Special Issue 03.
  2. Antoszewski A., Koalicje gabinetowe w Europie, in: W. Bokajło (ed.), Studia z teorii polityki, kultury politycznej i myśli politycznej, Wrocław 1996.
  3. Antoszewski A., Kozierska J., Poland: Weak Coalitions and Small Party Suicide in Government, in: T. Bergman, G. Ilonszki, W.C. Müller (eds), Coalition Governance in Central Eastern Europe, forthcoming, Oxford 2019.
  4. Antoszewski A., Tworzenie i utrzymanie koalicji gabinetowych, in: A. Antoszewski, R. Herbut (eds), Demokracje zachodnioeuropejskie. Analiza porównawcza, Wrocław 2007.
  5. Antoszewski A., Wybory parlamentarne 2005 i ich konsekwencje dla rozwoju polskiego systemu partyjnego, in: D. Waniek (ed.), Partie polityczne w wyborach 2005, Warszawa 2006.
  6. Axelrod R., Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals within Applications to Politics, Chicago 1970.
  7. Bale T., Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: the Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarizing Party Systems, “West European Politics” 2003, Vol. 26, Issue 3.
  8. Brigevich A., Smith B.W., Bakker R., Unpacking the Social (GAL/TAN) Dimension of Party Politics: Euroscepticism and Party Positioning on Europe’s “Other”, Paper prepared for the 15th Biennial EUSA Conference, Miami, FL, May 4–6, 2017.
  9. Cappocia G., Repression, Incorporation, Lustration, Education: How Democracies React to Their Enemies. Towards a Theoretical Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Defense of Democracy Repression, Paper presented to the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Grenoble, 6–11 April 2001, Workshop: Democracy and the New Extremist Challenge in Europe.
  10. Cześnik M., Kotnarowski M., Nowy wymiar politycznego współzawodnictwa: Polska Solidarna versus Polska Liberalna, „Studia Polityczne” 2011, No. 27.
  11. De Lange S.L., From Pariah to Power: The Government Participation of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in West European Democracies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp 2008.
  12. De Lange S.L., New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties, “Political Studies” 2012, Vol. 60, Issue 4.
  13. De Lange S.L., Radical Right – Wing Populist Parties in Office – A Cross – National Comparison, in: U. Backes, P. Moreau (eds), The Extreme Right in Europe: Current Trends and Perspectives, Göttingen 2011.
  14. De Swaan A., Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918, Amsterdam 1973.
  15. Downs W.M., Pariahs in their Midst: Belgian and Norwegian Parties React to Extremist Threats., “West European Politics” 2001, Vol. 24, Issue 3.
  16. Downs W.M., Political Extremism in Democracies. Combating Intolerance, New York 2012.
  17. Dudek A., Historia polityczna Polski 1989–2012, Kraków 2013.
  18. Gulczyński M., Charakterystyka głównych sił politycznych uczestniczących w wyborach 2005, in: D. Waniek (ed.), Partie polityczne w wyborach 2005, Warszawa 2006.
  19. Heinisch R., Success in Opposition-Failure in Government: Explaining the Performance of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Public Office, “West European Politics” 2003, Vol. 26, Issue 3.
  20. Interview with Jarosław Kaczyński, February 14, 2005, http://www.batory.org.pl/programy_operacyjne/debaty/cykl_naprawa/artykuly_15/wyklad_jaroslawa_kaczynskiego_14_lutego_2005 [access: February 15, 2005].
  21. Lanny W.M., Randolph T.S., Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies, “American Journal of Political Science” 2001, Vol. 45, Issue 1.
  22. Laver M., Schofield N., Multiparty Government. The Politics of Coalition in Europe, Michigan 2007.
  23. Leiserson M., Coalition Government in Japan, in: S. Groennings, E.W. Kelly, M. Leiserson (eds), The Study of Coalition Behavior: Theoretical Perspectives and Cases from Four Continents, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1970.
  24. Leiserson M., Coalitions in Politics: A Theoretical and Empirical Study, PhD Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven 1966.
  25. Lipiński A., Delegitymizacja III Rzeczypospolitej. Budowanie partyjnej tożsamości i dyskursywne struktury możliwości, „Studia Polityczne” 2012, No. 4.
  26. Markowski R., Cześnik M., Wybory parlamentarne 2007 roku – Ciągły zamęt czy utrwalenie nowego rozłamu?, „Studia Polityczne” 2007, No. 27.
  27. Meguid B.M., Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success, “American Political Science Review” 2005, Vol. 99, Issue 3.
  28. Meguid B.M., Party Competition between Unequals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
  29. Minkenberg M., Profiles, Patterns, Processes: Studying the Eastern European Radical Right in its Political Environment, in: M. Minkenberg (ed.), Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process, New York 2015.
  30. Minkenberg M., The Radical Right in Public Office: Agenda-Setting and Policy Effects, “West European Politics” 2001, Vol. 24, Issue 4.
  31. Moroska A., Prawicowy populizm a eurosceptycyzm: na przykładzie Listy Pima Fortuyna w Holandii i Ligi Polskich Rodzin w Polsce, Wrocław 2010.
  32. Moroska A., Zuba K., Two Faces of Polish Populism. The Causes of the Success and Fall of Self Defense and the League of Polish Families, “Totalitarismus und Demokratie” 2010, Vol. 7.
  33. Pankowski R., The Populist Radical Right in Poland: the Patriots, London–New York 2010.
  34. PAP, L. Kaczyński: PiS nie ma planów koalicji z Samoobroną czy LPR, October 7, 2005, https://www.pb.pl/l-kaczynski-pis-nie-ma-planow-koalicji-z-samoobrona-czy-lpr-281009 [access: October 23, 2019].
  35. Pytlas B., Kossack O., Lighting the Fuse: the Impact of Radical Right Parties on Party Competition in Central and Eastern Europe, in: M. Minkenberg (ed.), Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process, Routledge, London 2015.
  36. Pytlas B., Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe. Mainstream Party Competition and Electoral Fortune, Routledge, London 2016.
  37. Riker W.H., The Theory of Political Coalitions, Yale University Press, New Haven CT 1962.
  38. Sokół W., Żmigrodzki M., Współczesne partie i systemy partyjne: zagadnienia teorii i praktyki politycznej, Lublin 2011.
  39. Strom K.A., Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties, “American Journal of Political Science” 1990, Vol. 34, Issue 2.
  40. Szawiel T., Podział na lewicę i prawicę w Polsce po 1989 roku – jego sens i trwałość, in: R. Markowski (ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze, Warszawa 2002.
  41. Twist K.A., The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe, A dissertation University of California, Berkeley 2015.
  42. Van Spanje J., Parties beyond the Pale: Why some political parties are ostracized by their competitors while others are not, “Comparative European Politics” 2010, Vol. 8, Issue 3.
  43. Von Neumann L., Morgenstern O., Theory and Games of Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1944; Gamson W.A., A Theory of Coalition Formation, “American Sociological Review” 1961, Vol. 26, Issue 3.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.