Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
KiS baner

Tom 67 Nr 1 (2023)

Z warsztatów badawczych

An Outline of Methodology in Studies on Online Donations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2023.67.1.9
Przesłane: 13 maja 2022
Opublikowane: 31 marca 2023

Abstrakt

The article proposes methodological guidelines for studies on a new tool in communication and gift-giving: online donations. It looks at donations in the context of gift culture, with particular emphasis on the changes introduced by digitisation. The author argues that online donations are a source of valuable data, which could prove useful for many sciences. As a very specific and relatively new form on the media market, donations are not an easy research material. An outline is provided of the methodology in studies on online donations, including challenges and problems that researchers may encounter. The solutions presented in the article are the result of the author’s three years of work in the field of collecting and analysing online donation data.

Bibliografia

  1. Artwick Claudette G., 2018, Social Media Livestreaming: Design for Disruption?, Routledge, London.
  2. Belk Russel W., 1977, Gift-Giving Behavior, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  3. Bolter Jay D., Grusin Richard, 2000, Remediation. Understanding New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge–London.
  4. Cheal David, 1987, ‘Showing Them You Love Them’: Gift Giving and the Dialectic of Intimacy, “The Sociological Review”, 35(1): 150–169.
  5. Cheal David, 1988, The Gift Economy, Routledge, London.
  6. Cyrek Barbara, 2021, The Role of Algorithms in Structuring Online Communities: the Case of YouTube, in: Khalid S. Soliman (ed.), Innovation Management and Sustainable Economic Development in the Era of Global Pandemic. Proceedings of the 38th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), 23–24 November 2021, Seville, Spain: 3815–3819.
  7. Daro Ishmael N., Silverman Craig, 2018, How YouTube’s “Super Chat” System Is Pushing Video Creators Toward More Extreme Content (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ishmaeldaro/youtube-comments-hate-speech-racist-white-nationalists-super?mod=article_inline [accessed: 12.05.2022]).
  8. Dewey Caitlin, 2016, A Quick, No-nonsense Guide to Using Facebook’s New Reactions, “The Washington Post” (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/02/24/a-quick-no-nonsense-guide-to-using-facebooks-new-reactions/ [accessed: 10.05.2022]).
  9. Goldhaber Michael H., 1997, The Attention Economy and the Net, “First Monday”, 2(4), (https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/519/440 [accessed: 10.01.2022]).
  10. Gregory Chris A., 1980, Gifts to Men and Gifts to God: Gift Exchange and Capital Accumulation in Contemporary Papua, “Man (New Series)”, 15(4): 626–652.
  11. Gregory Chris A., 1982, Gifts and Commodities, Academic Press, London.
  12. Harbaugh William T., 1998a, What Do Donations Buy? A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow, “Journal of Public Economics”, 67: 269–284.
  13. Harbaugh William T., 1998b, The Prestige Motive for Making Charitable Transfers, “The American Economic Review”, 88(2): 277–282.
  14. Hillery George A., 1955, Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement, “Rural Sociology”, 20(2): 111–123.
  15. Hollenbeck Candice R., Peters Cara, Zinkhan George M., 2006, Gift Giving: A Community Paradigm, “Psychology & Marketing”, 23(7): 573–595.
  16. Homan Roger, 1980, The Ethics of Covert Methods, “The British Journal of Sociology”, 31(1): 46–59.
  17. Kizilcec René F., Bakshy Eytan, Eckles Dean, Burke Moira, 2018, Social Influence and Reciprocity in Online Gift Giving, “CHI ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems”, paper no. 126: 1–11.
  18. Kobus Martyna, Jemielniak Dariusz, 2014, Ekonomia daru i społeczności otwartej współpracy — nowe kierunki badań społecznych [The economy of gift and open collaboration communities — new directions of social studies], “E-mentor”, 56(4): 4–9.
  19. Komter Aafke, Vollebergh Wilma, 1997, Gift Giving and the Emotional Significance of Family and Friends, “Journal of Marriage and Family”, 59(3): 747–757.
  20. Kreft Jan, 2018, Władza algorytmów: u źródeł potęgi Google i Facebooka [The power of algorithms: at the source of the power of Google and Facebook], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
  21. Kwon Hyosun, Koleva Boriana, Schnädelbach Holger, Benford Steve, 2017, “It’s Not Yet A Gift”: Understanding Digital Gifting, “CSCW ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing”: 2372–2384.
  22. Laidlaw James, 2003, A Free Gift Makes No Friends, “Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute”, 6(4): 617–634.
  23. Lampel Joseph, Bhalla Ajay, 2007, The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience, “Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication”, 12(2): 434–455.
  24. Lévi-Strauss Claude, 1969, The Elementary Structures of Kinship, Beacon Press, Boston.
  25. McQuail Denis, 1984, With the Benefit of Hindsight: Reflections on Uses and Gratifications Research, “Critical Studies in Mass Communication”, 1: 177–193.
  26. Malinowski Bronisław, 1922, Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea, Routledge, London.
  27. Mauss Marcel, 2001 [1925], The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, Routledge, London.
  28. Muchnik-Rozanov Yulia, Tsybulsky Dina, 2020, Linguistic Analysis of Science Teachers’ Narratives Using AntConc Software, in: Eugene Kennedy, Yufeng Qian (eds.), Advancing Educational Research With Emerging Technology, IGI Global, Hershey: 211–230.
  29. Mysterud Iver, Drevon Thomas, Slagsvold Tore, 2006, An Evolutionary Interpretation of Gift-giving Behavior in Modern Norwegian Society, “Evolutionary Psychology”, 4: 406–425.
  30. Paolillo John, Pimienta Daniel, Prado Daniel, 2005, Measuring Linguistic Diversity on the Internet, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Montreal.
  31. Pardee Grant, 2017, The Spammy History of ( ) Le Lenny Face (https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/le-lenny-face/ [accessed: 10.01.2022]).
  32. Przegalińska Aleksandra, Jemielniak Dariusz, 2015, Jakościowe metody badawcze interakcji wirtualnych [Qualitative research methods for virtual interactions], in: Monika Kostera, (ed.), Metody badawcze w zarządzaniu humanistycznym [Research methods in humanistic management], Sedno, Warszawa: 93–105.
  33. Recktenwald Daniel, 2016, “Donation Alerts” on Twitch.TV: Commodification of Community and Attention, in: IMPEC 2016 Interactions Multimodales Par ÉCran: 143–144.
  34. Rotman Dana, Golbeck Jennifer, Preece Jennifer, 2009, The Community Is Where the Rapport Is—On Sense and Structure in the Youtube Community, “C&T ’09 Proceedings of the fourth international conference on communities and technologies”: 41–50.
  35. Rotman Dana, Preece Jennifer, 2010, The ‘WeTube’ in YouTube—Creating an Online Community through Video Sharing, “International Journal of Web Based Communities”, 6(3): 317–333.
  36. Sahlins Marshall, 1972, Stone Age Economics, Aldine–Atherton, Chicago.
  37. Shepherd Maddie, 2020, Crowdfunding Statistics (2021): Market Size and Growth (https://www.fundera.com/resources/crowdfunding-statistics [accessed: 10.05.2022]).
  38. Sherry John F. Jr., 1983, Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective, “The Journal of Consumer Research”, 10(2): 157–168.
  39. Spicker Paul, 2011, Ethical Covert Research, “Sociology”, 45(1): 118–133.
  40. Stewart Will, 2020, Horror on Cam (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13368928/youtuber-kills-pregnant-girlfriend-livestream-sub-zero-balcony-abuse/ [accessed: 13.02.2022]).
  41. Tedre Matti, Kamppuri Minna, Kommers Piet, 2006, An Approach to Global Netiquette Research, “IADIS International Conference on Web Based Communities”: 367–370.
  42. Van Dijck José, Poell Thomas, De Waal Martijn, 2018, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World, Oxford University Press, New York.
  43. Wang Zongshui, Liu Haiyan, Liu Wei, Wang Shouyang, 2020, Understanding the Power of Opinion Leaders’ Influence on the Diffusion Process of Popular Mobile Games: Travel Frog on Sina Weibo, “Computers in Human Behavior”, 109: 106354.
  44. Webley Paul, Lea Stephen E.G., Portalska R., 1983, The Unacceptability of Money as a Gift, “Journal of Economic Psychology”, 4(3): 223–238.
  45. Webley Paul, Wilson Richenda,1989, Social Relationships and the Unacceptability of Money as a Gift, “The Journal of Social Psychology”, 129(1): 85–91.
  46. YouTube Creators, 2020, Super Chat & Super Stickers: Setup and Tips for Using Them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXwpWEbAmd0 [accessed: 10.05.2022]).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.