Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
KiS baner

Tom 70 Nr 2 (2026): Nowe wrażliwości antropologii

Artykuły i rozprawy

DIY Practices and New Anthropological Sensibilities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2026.70.2.6
Przesłane: 1 sierpnia 2025
Opublikowane: 30 czerwca 2026

Abstrakt

This article explores amateur craft practices (DIY — Do-It-Yourself) as intimate, relational, and materially embedded activities that provide a unique lens for exploring anthropology’s “new sensibilities”. The authors analyse DIY practices not merely as technical work, but as a socially and materially complex activity involving care, embodiment and sensory knowledge. Rejecting the romanticised image of the bricoleur, the paper highlights the classed nature of such practices and their entanglement with consumer capitalism. Ultimately, DIY is shown not as a rebellion against the system, but as a meaningful everyday practice operating within it — shaping identity, enabling resilience, and fostering alternative ways of being-in-the-world.

Bibliografia

  • Anderson Glenn, 2007, Thinking Through Craft, Oxford: Berg.
  • Campbell Colin, 2005, The Craft Consumer, “Journal of Consumer Culture”, 5(1): 23–42.
  • Carr Chantel & Gibson Chris, 2016, Geographies of Making: Rethinking Materials and Skills for Volatile Futures, “Progress in Human Geography”, 40(3): 297–315.
  • Dant Tim, 1999, Material Culture in the Social World: Values, Activities, Lifestyles, Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Davies Sarah R., 2017, Hackerspaces. Making the Maker Movement, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Dougherty, Dale, 2012, The Maker Movement, “Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization”, 7(3): 11–4.
  • Featherstone Mike, 1987, Consumption and lifestyles, „Theory, Culture & Society”, 4(1): 55–70.
  • Gądecki Jacek & Piziak Bartosz, 2021, Przestrzenie kreatywno warsztatowe. Makerspace’y, fab laby i warsztaty w przestrzeniach polskich miast, Warszawa–Kraków: Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów,Obserwatorium Polityki Miejskiej.
  • Gądecki Jacek, 2026, Materialność majsterkowania. O sprawczości ludzi, narzędzi i przestrzeni w praktykach współczesnego DIY, Warszawa: Scholar (upcoming).
  • Ingold Tim, 2011, Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London: Routledge.
  • Ingold Tim, 2013, Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture, London: Routledge.
  • Krajewski Marek (ed.), 2010, Handmade: praca rąk w postindustrialnej rzeczywistości, Warszawa: Fundacja Nowej Kultury Bęc Zmiana.
  • Klekot Ewa, 2020, The Craft of Factory Labor Available to Purchase. „Journal of American Folklore”, 133(528): 205–27.
  • Leadbeater Charles & Miller Paul, 2004, The Pro-Am Revolution: How Enthusiasts Are Changing Our Society and Economy, London: Demos.
  • MacKinnon Danny & Derickson Kate Driscoll, 2013, From Resilience to Resourcefulness: A Critique of Resilience Policy and Activism, “Progress in Human Geography”, 37(2): 253–70.
  • Maines Rachel, 2009, Hedonizing Technologies: Paths to Pleasure in Hobbies and Leisure, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Marchand Trevor H. J., 2022, The Pursuit of Pleasurable Work: Craftwork in Twenty-First Century England, New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Nosal Przemysław & Maciej Frąckowiak, 2025, Zaradność społeczna: Od ujęcia egzystencjalnego do egzystencjalistycznego? “Przegląd Socjologiczny”, 74: 29–56.
  • Pallasmaa Juhaani, 2009, The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pink Sarah, 2009, Doing Sensory Ethnography, London: SAGE.
  • Reckwitz Andreas, 2002, Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing, “European Journal of Social Theory”, 5(2): 243–263.
  • Roberts Kenneth, 2011, Leisure: the importance of being inconsequential, “Leisure Studies”, 30(1): 5–20.
  • Rosner Daniela K., Fox Sarah E., 2016, Legacies of craft and the centrality of failure in a mother-operated hackerspace, “New Media & Society”, 18(4): 558–80.
  • Rowsell Jennifer, 2011, Carrying my family with me: artefacts as emic perspectives, “Qualitative Research”, 11(3): 331–46.
  • Schatzki Theodore, 1996, Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schatzki Theodore, 2002, The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Sennett Richard, 2008, The Craftsman, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Stebbins Robert, 2007, A Serious Leisure: A Perspective for Our Time, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Stewart Kathleen, 2007, Ordinary Affects, Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Stocking George W. Jr., 1989, Romantic Motives: Essays on Anthropological Sensibility, “History of Anthropology”, vol. 6, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • von Hippel Eric, 2005, Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.