Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 50 No. 1-2 (2006): Więzi i uczucia

Articles and essays

Nefemerides in the Seanet. Escape of Emotions from the Post-privacy Cage

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2006.50.1-2.5
Submitted: January 4, 2024
Published: March 30, 2006

Abstract

Industrial society and powers which controlled that society are no more. Instead, there is a Seanet and an Empire, a new form of web power, which strives to control it by producing symbols, needs and identities. Through its agency — a rapidly weakening state — the Empire pushes the Seanet into the cage of post-privacy. In the post-private society the distinction between the private and public disappears which leads to the subordination of emotions to a new refined digital form of control. It is possible to escape from the overwhelming post-private control — through the nephemerides (new noninstitutional forms of net social life), desertion, and positive trolling. The text should be placed in the theoretical model that — out of lack of alternatives — might be called evolutionary net neomarxism. The article offers a reconstruction of the problem of love as a subject in sociology and the typology of contemporary approaches to it. The first part discusses the following themes: representation of love in classical sociology based on the works of Max Weber; its gradual exclusion from the list of legitimate sociological subjects and the reasons for its return into that sphere. The second part presents the typology of contemporary sociological understandings of love and reconstructs sociobiological theories and conceptions of Pierre Bourdieu, Niklas Luhmann and Zygmunt Bauman.

References

  1. Anderson Benedict, 1997, Wspólnoty wyobrażone. Rozważania o źródłach i rozprzestrzenianiu się nacjonalizmu, tłum. Stefan Amsterdamski, Znak, Kraków.
  2. Aronson Jane, 1998, Lesbians Giving and Receiving Care: Stretching Conceptualizations of Caring and Community, „Women’s Studies International Forum”, t. 21, nr 5, s. 505–519.
  3. Bauman Zygmunt, 2004, Utopia bez toposu, w: Małgorzata Jacyno, Aldona Jawłowska, Marian Kempny (red.), Kultura w czasach globalizacji, IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
  4. Beck-Gernsheim Elisabeth, 2002, Reinventing the Family. In Search of New Lifestyles, tłum. z niem. Patrick Camiller, Polity Press, Oxford.
  5. Bendyk Edwin, 2005, Antymatrix. Epilog II, „Krytyka Polityczna”, nr 7/8.
  6. Brzechczyn Krzysztof, 2004, O wielości linii rozwojowych w procesie historycznym, Wydawnictwo UAM, Poznań.
  7. Castells Manuel, 2004, Informacjonalizm i społeczeństwo sieciowe, tłum. Krzysztof Pietrowicz, „Przegląd Polityczny”, nr 64.
  8. Castoriadis Cornelius, 1998, The Imaginary Institution of Society, tłum. z franc. Kathleen Blamey, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  9. Giddens Anthony, 2003, Stanowienie społeczeństwa. Zarys teorii strukturacji, tłum. Stefan Amsterdamski, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
  10. Hansen Karen V., 2005, Not-So-Nuclear Families. Class, Gender, and Networks of Care, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick–New Jersey–London.
  11. Harding Jennifer, 2002, Private Sex, Public Danger, w: Tim Jordan, Steve Pile (red.), Social Change, The Open University Press–Blackwell Publishing, Oxford–Cambridge, MA.
  12. Hardt Michael, Negri Antonio, 2005, Imperium, tłum. Sergiusz Ślusarski, Adam Kołbaniuk, Wydawnictwo WAB, Warszawa.
  13. Jarecka Urszula, 2004, Wirtualne więzi w globalizującym się świecie, w: Małgorzata Jacyno,
  14. Aldona Jawłowska, Marian Kempny (red.), Kultura w czasach globalizacji, IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
  15. Krzysztofek Kazimierz, Szczepański Marek S., 2005, Zrozumieć rozwój. Od społeczeństw tradycyjnych do informacyjnych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.
  16. Lipovetsky Gilles, 1994, The Empire of Fashion. Dressing Modern Democracy, tłum. z franc. Catherine Porter, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford.
  17. Maffesoli Michel, 2000, The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Indiviualism in Mass Society, tłum. z franc. Don Smith, Sage Publications, London.
  18. McCarthy John, Zald Meyer N. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory, „American Journal of Sociology”, t. 82, nr 6, s. 1212–1241.
  19. Nowak Leszek, 1991, U podstaw teorii socjalizmu, t. 3: Dynamika władzy, Nakom, Poznań.
  20. Pietrowicz Krzysztof, 2004, Etyka hakerska. Wyzwanie dla konsumeryzmu?, w: Tomasz Szlendak, Krzysztof Pietrowicz (red.), Na pokaz. O konsumeryzmie w kapitalizmie bez kapitału, Wydawnictwo UMK, Toruń.
  21. Rebhun Linda-Anne, 1999, The Heart is Unknown Country: Love in the Changing Economy of Northeast Brazil, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. Sztompka Piotr, 2002, Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa, Znak, Kraków.
  22. Touraine Alain, 1977, The Self-Production of Society, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago–London.
  23. Touraine Alain, 1981, The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements, Cambridge University Press–Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Cambridge.
  24. Urry John, 2004, Globalne układy złożone, w: Małgorzata Jacyno, Aldona Jawłowska, Marian Kempny (red.), Kultura w czasach globalizacji, IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
  25. Zunzunegui Maria V. i in., 2004, Social Networks and Self-reported Health in Two French-speaking Canadian Community Dwelling Populations over 65, „Social Science and Medicine”, t. 58, s. 2069–2081.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 22 23 24 25 26 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.