Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 69 No. 4 (2025): Symbolic Boundaries in Social Communication

Articles and essays

Redefining symbolic boundaries regarding women's work - an analysis of feminist narratives and the tradwife movement

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2025.69.4.6
Submitted: February 26, 2025
Published: December 12, 2025

Abstract

The article analyses the transformation of symbolic boundaries concerning women’s work by focusing on two interrelated narratives: the feminist movement and the tradwife community. In the face of post-pandemic challenges and growing criticism of neoliberal capitalism, notions of success and self-fulfillment are being redefined, particularly in the context of women’s dual workloads of paid employment and domestic labor. The category of work is reconsidered as a multidimensional experience extending beyond the capitalist market and the logic of productivity. In particular, attention is paid to how tradwives perceive this notion, detaching it from paid careers and attempting to re-establish the value of domestic and care work. The article points out that although tradwives criticize neoliberal values, their social media activity often fits into the capitalist logic of content monetization. The analysis also shows that both feminism and tradwives reflect on structural inequalities and highlight the need to develop reliable solutions to the challenges of the contemporary world.

References

  • Allen Kim, Finn Kirsty, 2024, #Girlbossing the University Side Hustle: Entrepreneurial Femininities, Postfeminism and the Veneer of ‘Female Success’ in Times of Crisis, „European Journal of Cultural Studies”, t. 27(3), s. 333–351.
  • Blank Gary, 2014, Production and Patriarchy in Capitalist Society: A Comparative Review of Hartmann and Young, „Analyze — Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies”, nr 2.
  • Cislaghi Beniamino, Heise Lori, 2020, Gender Norms and Social Norms: Differences, Similarities and Why They Matter in Prevention Science, „Sociology of Health & Illness”, t. 42(2), s. 407–422.
  • Cochrane Kira, 2013, The Fourth Wave of Feminism: Meet the Rebel Women, „The Guardian”, 10 grudnia (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/10/fourth-wave-feminism -rebel-women [dostęp: 10.01.2025]).
  • Delap Lucy, 2024, Feminizmy. Historia globalna, tłum. Filip Fierek, Wydawnictwo Drzazgi, Okoniny.
  • Desperak Izabela, 2004, Kobiety i praca. Wielkie przegrane polskiej transformacji, Biblioteka Online Think Tanku Feministycznego (http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl/pdf/fe0061desperak 2004.pdf).
  • Epstein Cynthia, 1992, Tinkerbells and Pinups: The Construction and Reconstruction of Gender Boundaries at Work, w: Michèle Lamont, Marcel Fournier (red.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, s. 232–256.
  • Everingham Phoebe, Chassagne Natasha, 2020, Post COVID-19 Ecological and Social Reset: Moving Away from Capitalist Growth Models towards Tourism, „Tourism Geographies”, t. 22(3), s. 555–566.
  • Faludi Susan, 2013, Reakcja. Niewypowiedziana wojna przeciw kobietom, tłum. Anna Dzierzgowska, Wydawnictwo Czarna Owca, Warszawa.
  • Federici Silvia, 2022, Poza granicami skóry. Przemyśliwanie, przekształcanie i odzyskiwanie ciała we współczesnym kapitalizmie, tłum. Joanna Bednarek, Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa, Warszawa.
  • Firestone Shulamith, 1970, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, A Bantam Book, New York.
  • Follett Chelsea, 2017, Why Feminists Should Embrace Capitalism, CapX, 15 maja (https://www.cato.org/commentary/why-feminists-should-embrace-capitalism [dostęp: 26.01.2025]).
  • Fraser Nancy, 2013, How Feminism Became Capitalism’s Handmaiden — and How to Reclaim It, „The Guardian”, 14 października (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal [dostęp: 10.01.2025]).
  • Freeman Hadley, 2020, ‘Tradwives’: The New Trend for Submissive Women Has a Dark Heart and History, „The Guardian”, 27 stycznia (https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/jan/27/tradwives-new-trend-submissive-women-dark-heart-history [dostęp: 10.01.2025]).
  • Hannam June, 2010, Feminizm, tłum. Agnieszka Kaflińska, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
  • Hartmann Heidi I., 1979, The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union, „Capital & Class”, t. 3(2), s. 1–33.
  • Hewitt Nancy A., 2012, Feminist Frequencies: Regenerating the Wave Metaphor, „Feminist Studies”, t. 38(3), s. 658–680.
  • Idriss Sherene, 2022, The Ethnicised Hustle: Narratives of Enterprise and Postfeminism Among Young Migrant Women, „European Journal of Cultural Studies”, t. 25(3), s. 807–823.
  • Kabza Milena, 2022, Ogromna wartość nieodpłatnej pracy kobiet, FORSAL.PL (https://forsal.pl/gospodarka/artykuly/8379337,ogromna-wartosc-nieodplatnej-pracy-kobiet.html [dostęp: 20.02.2025]).
  • Kelsey-Sugg Anna, 2021, For Some, Being a Tradwife Is about More Time with Family. For Others, It’s a Dangerous Far-Right Ideology, abc.net.news (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-22/tradwife-movement-personal-pleasures-or-extreme-right-ideologies/100356514 [dostęp:10.01.2024]).
  • Konecki Krzysztof T., 2000, Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • Kożuch Antoni, Marzec Izabela, 2014, Studium przypadku jako strategia badawcza w naukach społecznych, „Zeszyty Naukowe WSOWL”, nr 2, s. 32–44.
  • Kwaśniewska Sylwia, 2022, Nieodpłatna praca kobiet: równość zaczyna się w domu, Krytyka Polityczna, 14 czerwca (https://krytykapolityczna.pl/gospodarka/kobiety-praca-dom-nierownosci/ [dostęp:10.02.2025]).
  • Lamont Michèle, Fournier Marcel, 1992, Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Lichnerowicz Agnieszka, Scott Linda, 2021, Chciałabym to zobaczyć, jak połowa Polek wystąpiła o apostazję, wysokieobcasy.pl, 2 maja (https://www.wysokieobcasy.pl/wysokie- obcasy/7,157211,27037344,linda-scott-autorka-kapitalu-kobiet-chcialabym-to-zobaczyc.html [dostęp: 13.02.2025]).
  • McKeon Michael, 2006, The Secret History of Domesticity, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • McRobbie Angela, 2004, Post-Feminism and Popular Culture, „Feminist Media Studies”, t. 4(3), s. 255–264.
  • McRobbie Angela, 2007, Postfeminizm i co dalej?, tłum. Anna Wolna (https://www.mocak.pl/angela-mcrobbie-postfeminizm-i-co-dalej [dostęp: 23.01.2025]).
  • Munro Ealasaid, 2013, Feminism: A Fourth Wave?, „Political Insight”, t. 4(2), s. 22–25.
  • Oxley Julinna, 2011, Liberal Feminism, w: Michael Bruce, Steven Barbone (red.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy, Wiley–Blackwell, Malden.
  • Proctor Devin, 2022, The #Tradwife Persona and the Rise of Radicalized White Domesticity, „Persona Studies”, t. 8(2), s. 7–26.
  • Silverman David, 2008, Interpretacja danych jakościowych, tłum. Małgorzata Głowacka-Grajper, Joanna Ostrowska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • Shukla Aarushee, 2021, Feminism and Capitalism: The Ideological Dilemma of Coexistence, Feminism in India, 24 czerwca (https://feminisminindia.com/2021/06/24/feminism-and-capitalism-the-ideological-dilemma-of-coexistence [dostęp:10.01.2025]).
  • Sitler-Elbel Frankie Hope, 2021, From Swiffers to Swastikas: How the #Tradwife Movement of Conventional Gender Roles Became Synonymous with White Supremacy, Bard College.
  • Solé Elise, 2023, Cooking, Cleaning and Controversy: The ‘Tradwife’ Movement Embraces a 1950s Housewife Ideal, TODAY, 7 marca (https://www.today.com/parents/family/traditional-wives-tradwives-controversy-tiktok-rcna67253 [dostęp: 27.01.2025]).
  • Tranby Eric, Zulkowski Samantha, 2012, Religion as Cultural Power: The Role of Religion in Influencing Americans’ Symbolic Boundaries around Gender and Sexuality, „Sociology Compass”, t. 6(11), s. 870–882.
  • Ward Lucy, 2003, Feminism: Outmoded and Unpopular, „The Guardian”, 2 czerwca (https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/jul/02/gender.women [dostęp:18.02.2025]).
  • Weber Kairo, 2023, Gender Confirmation Work, Rest, and Symbolic Boundaries in (Trans)Gender Support Groups, „Sex Roles”, t. 89, s. 492–504.
  • Zahay Megan, 2022, What “Real” Women Want: Alt-Right Femininity Vlogs as an Anti-Feminist Populist Aesthetic, „Media and Communication”, t. 10(4), s. 170–179.
  • Zeisler Andi, 2008, Feminism and Pop Culture, Seal Press, Berkley.
  • Zhang Yiyue, Rios Kimberly, 2022, Understanding Perceptions of Radical and Liberal Feminists: The Nuanced Roles of Warmth and Competence, „Sex Roles: A Journal of Research”, t. 86(3––4), s. 143–158.
  • Zajączkowska Dominika, 2024, Ruch tradwife jako przestrzeń propagowania radykalnych ideologii i narracji spiskowych, „Panoptikum”, nr 32, s. 110–132.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.