Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
KiS baner

Vol. 63 No. 1 (2019): SPOŁECZNE W ARCHIWACH

Articles and essays

The Ethics of Managing Visual Materials: the Creation and Functioning of Visual Databases

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2019.63.1.3
Submitted: December 13, 2019
Published: March 29, 2019

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the basic ethical dilemmas in the creation and functioning of visual databases in the social sciences. The author starts from the assumption that social research is a form of power and therefore requires regulation in regard to its methods and the management of the collected empirical material. Three main dimensions of the ethics of visual research are presented: in-formed consent; anonymity and confidentiality; and presentation, dissemination and anonymization. The author discusses these dimensions in regard to proposals for the creation of open databases under the Horizon 2020 Open Research Data project and then presents his own proposals concerning matters of importance in creating visual databases.

References

  1. Banks Markus, 2009, Materiały wizualne w badaniach jakościowych, tłum. Paweł Tomanek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  2. Carrabine Eamonn, 2012, Just Images: Aesthetics, Ethics and Visual Criminology, „The British Journal of Criminology”, t. 52(3), s. 463–489.
  3. Cox Susa, Drew Sarah, Guillemin Marilys, Howell Catherine, Warr Deborah, Waycott Jenny, 2014, Guidelines for Ethical Visual Research Methods, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
  4. de Laat Sonia, 2004, Picture Perfect (?): Ethical Considerations in Visual Representation, „Nexus: The Canadian Student Journal of Anthropology”, t. 17, s. 122–149.
  5. Guta Adrian, Flicker Sarah, Travers Robb, Klein Kate, Gahagan Jacqueline, McClelland Alex, St. John Alex, Symington Alison, Ibanez-Carrasco Francisco, 2014a, HIV CBR Ethics Fact Sheet #5: Informed consent. Improving the Accessibility of Research Ethics Boards for HIV Community-Based Research in Canada, Toronto, ON (http://www.hivethicscbr.com/#documents [23.08.2018]).
  6. Guta Adrian, Flicker Sarah, Travers Robb, Greene Saara, Munro Lauren, Strike Carol, Switzer Sarah, 2014b, HIV CBR Ethics Fact Sheet #4: Ethical issues in Visual Image-based Research. Improving the Accessibility of Research Ethics Boards for HIV Community-Based Research in Canada, Toronto, ON (http://www.hivethicscbr.com/#documents [23.08.2018]).
  7. Hammersley Martyn, 2009, Against the Ethicists: On the Evils of Ethical Regulation, „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, t. 12(3), s. 211–225.
  8. Hammond Joyce D., 2004, Photography and Ambivalence, „Visual Studies”, t. 19(2), s. 135–144.
  9. Iphofen Ron, 2011, Ethical Decision Making in Qualitative Research, „Qualitative Research”, t. 11(4), s. 443–446.
  10. Jennings Sean LM, 2010, Two Models of Social Science Research Ethics Review, „Research Ethics Review”, t. 6(3), s. 86–90.
  11. Manhas Kiran Pohar, Oberle Kathleen, 2015, The Ethics of Metaphor as a Research Tool, „Research Ethics”, t. 11(1), s. 42–51.
  12. Mitchell Claudia, 2011, Doing Visual Research, Sage, London.
  13. Mok Tze Ming, Cornish Flora, Tarr Jen, 2015, Too Much Information: Visual Research Ethics in the Age of Wearable Cameras, „Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science”, t. 49(2), s. 309–322.
  14. Nissenbaum Helen, 2010, Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  15. IVSA, 2009, Papademas Diana and The International Visual Sociology Association, Code of Research Ethics and Guidelines, „Visual Studies”, t. 24(3), s. 250–257.
  16. Pauwels Luc, 2008, Taking and Using: Ethical Issues of Photographs for Research Purposes, „Visual Communication Quarterly”, t. 15(4), s. 243–257.
  17. Prosser Jon, Clark Andrew, Wiles Rose, 2008, Visual Research Ethics at the Crossroads, NCRM Working Paper. Realities, Morgan Centre, Manchester, UK.
  18. Prosser Jon, Loxley Andrew, 2008, Introducing Visual Methods, NCRM Review Papers (http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-010.pdf [30.09.2018]).
  19. Sliwinski Sharon, 2004, A Painful Labour: Responsibility and Photography, „Visual Studies”, t. 19(2), s. 150–161.
  20. Sihna Shamser, Back Les, 2014, Making Methods Sociable: Dialogue, Ethics and Authorship in Qualitative Research, „Qualitatove Research”, t. 14(4), s. 473–487.
  21. Vainio Annukka, 2012, Beyond Research Ethics: Anonymity as “Ontology”, “Analysis” and “Independence”, „Qualitative Research”, t. 13(6), s. 685–698.
  22. Wiles Rose, Coffey Amanda, Robinson Judy, Heath Sue, 2012, Anonymisation and Visual Images: Issues of Respect, “Voice” and Protection, „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, t. 15(1), s. 41–53.
  23. Wiles Rose, Prosser Jon, Bagnoli Anna, Clark Andrew, Davies Katherine, Holland Sally, Renold Emma, 2008, Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research, NCRM Working Paper (http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/ [23.08.2018]).
  24. H2020 Programme Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020, http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf.
  25. H2020 Programme Guidance Social media guide for EU funded R&I projects, http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/grants_manual/amga/soc-med-guide_en.pdf.
  26. H2020 Programme Guidelines to the Rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020, http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot=guide_en.pdf.
  27. Personal data and the Open Research Data Pilot, https://www.openaire.eu/ordp/ [29.09.2018].
  28. The FAIR Data Principles, https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 22 23 24 25 26 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.