Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
SP baner

Tom 50 Nr 4 (2022)

Dyskurs, Propaganda, Tożsamość

Anti-Ukrainian Discourse of Russian Media: Elimination Via Manipulation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2022.50.4.01
Przesłane: 30 maja 2023
Opublikowane: 23 lutego 2023

Abstrakt

This article contains a multifaceted cognitive, pragmatic and verbal analysis of anti-Ukrainian discourse in the Russian media from the point of view of its eliminative features. The main argument is that the discourse-forming concepts of ‘Ukronatists’, ‘understate’ and the far peripheral concept of the ‘fraternal people’ underpins multilevel eliminative strategies and the manipulative techniques of their implementation. The article argues that the identified discourse-forming concepts correspond to the three types of the narrative modelling of events according to the scenarios ‘The Story of a Just War’ and ‘Fathers and Sons’, and based on the metaphors of ‘mental disorder’, ‘predatory, scientific abstraction’, ‘drugs/alcohol addiction’ and ‘a house for NATO’. These are used to conceptualise Ukraine and Ukraine-associated matters leading to the construction of eliminative strategies for denying Ukrainian national identity and statehood, polarisation, symbolisation based on group stigmatisation, extermination, explicit and implicit dehumanisation through animalisation, deindividualisation and impersonalisation, as well as delegitimisation and masking actions as counteraction and self-defence.

Bibliografia

  1. Abbott B., Presuppositions as nonassertions, “Journal of pragmatics” 2000, Vol. 25, Issue 1, p. 1419–1437.
  2. Bach Kent, Saying, meaning, and implicating, in: The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, eds. Keith Allan, Kasia M. Jaszczolt, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012, p. 47–68.
  3. Barthes Roland, Mythologies, Paladin, London 1973.
  4. Bassin M., Pozo G. (eds). The Politics of Eurasianism: Identity, Popular Culture and Russia’s Foreign Policy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2017.
  5. Beaver D., Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford 2001.
  6. Chilton P., Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice, Routledge, London 2004.
  7. Darczewska J., The anatomy of Russian information warfare. The Crimean operation, a case study, Centre for Eastern Studies, Warsaw 2014.
  8. Dugin A., Fundamentals of geopolitics. Geopolitical future of Russia. ARCTOGEYA-center, Moscow 1997 / Дугин А., Основы геополитики. Геополитическое будущее России. АРКТОГЕЯ-центр, Москва 1997.
  9. Grice Paul, Logic and conversation, in: Syntax and semantics, eds. P. Cole, J.L. Morgan, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York 1975, p. 41–58.
  10. Fairclough N., A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research, in: Methods of critical discourse analysis, eds. R. Wodak, M. Meyer, Sage, London 2009, p. 162–186.
  11. Fairclough N., Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research, Routledge, London 2003.
  12. Fairclough I, Fairclough N., Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students, Routledge Ltd., New York 2012.
  13. Fauconnier G, Turner M., The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, Perseus Books, New York 2003.
  14. Foucault M., The order of discourse, in: Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader, eds. R. Young, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1981, p. 48–78.
  15. Giner-Sorolla R., Leidner B., Castano E., Dehumanization, Demonization, and Morality Shifting: Path to moral certainty in extremist violence, in: Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty, eds. M.A. Hogg, D.L. Blaylock, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, London 2011, p. 165–182.
  16. Goff P.A., Eberhardt J.L., Williams M.J., Jackson M.C., Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 2008, Vol. 94, Issue 2, p. 292–306.
  17. Goldhagen D.J., Worse than War: Genocide, Eliminationism, and the Ongoing Assault on Humanity, Public Affairs, New York 2009.
  18. Goldhagen D.J., Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, Knopf, New York 1996.
  19. Hansen L., Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, Routledge, London 2006.
  20. Hodge R., Kress G., Social Semiotics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. 1988.
  21. Haslam N., Loughnan S., Dehumanization and Infrahumanization, “Annual Review of Psychology” 2014, Vol. 65, Issue 1, p. 399–423.
  22. Haslam N., Dehumanization: An Integrative Review, “Personality and Social Psychology Review” 2006, Vol. 10, Issue 3, p. 252–264.
  23. Horn L.R., Implicature, in: The handbook of pragmatics, eds. L. Horn, G. Ward 2004, p. 3–28.
  24. Irfan I. M., Khaja H. An analysis of the linguistic techniques of propaganda in marketing and politics, “International Journal of English Learning and Teaching Skills” 2019, Vol. 2, Issue 2, p. 1181–1195.
  25. Kravchenko N.K., Discourse and Discourse Analysis: a Concise Encyclopedia, Interservice, Kyiv 2017 / Кравченко Н.К., Дискурс и дискурс-анализ: краткая энциклопедия, Интерсервис, Киев 2017.
  26. Kravchenko N., Pasternak T., Institutional Eco-pragmatics vs. Anthropo-Pragmatics: Problems, Challenges, Research Perspectives, “Cogito. Multidisciplinary research journal” 2020, Vol. XII, Issue 2, p. 24–39.
  27. Kravchenko N.K., Nikolska N.V., Discourse Structure Relationships (Based on International Legal “Soft Law” Discourse), “International journal of philology” 2020, Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 101–107.
  28. Kravchenko N, Zhykharieva O., Sign-like Pragmatic Devices: pro et contra, “Kalbų studijos” / “Studies about Languages” 2020, Vol. 36, p. 70–84.
  29. Kravchenko N., Illocution of Direct Speech Acts via Conventional Implicature and Semantic Presupposition, “Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow” 2017, Vol. 2, Issue 1, De Gruyter Open, Warsaw, p. 128–168.
  30. Kravchenko N., Indirect Speech Acts Via Conversational Implicatures and Pragmatic Presuppositions, “Cognition, communication, discourse. International online journal” 2017a, Vol. 14, p. 54–66.
  31. Laclau E., On populist reason, Verso, L., N.Y. 2005.
  32. Lakoff G., Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf, “Cognitive Semiotics” 2009, Vol. VI, Issue 2, p. 5–19.
  33. Lakoff G., Johnson M., Metaphors We Live by, The University of Chicago Publishing, Chicago 2003.
  34. Luke A., Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis, “Annual Review of Applied Linguistics” 2002, Vol. 22, p. 96–110.
  35. Lule J., War and Its Metaphors: News Language and the Prelude to War in Iraq, “Journalism Studies” 2004, Vol. 5, Issue 2, p. 179–190.
  36. Malinin V.N., The Elder of the Eleazar Monastery Philotheus and His Messages, Printing house of the Kiev-Pechersk Assumption Lavra, Kyiv 1901 / Малинин В.Н. Старец Елеазарова монастыря Филофей и его послания, Типография Киево-Печерской Успенской Лавры, Киев 1901.
  37. Moshman D., Us and Them: Identity and Genocide, “Identity” 2007, Vol. 7, Issue 2, p. 115–135.
  38. Musolff A., The Study of Metaphor as a Part of Critical Discourse Analysis, “Critical Discourse Studies” 2012, Vol. 9, Issue 3, p. 301–310.
  39. Potts C., Presupposition and Implicature, in: The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, eds. Shalom Lappin, Chris Fox, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New Jersey 2015, p. 168–202.
  40. Saran V. Media Manipulation and Psychological War in Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova. “CES Working Papers” 2016, Vol. VIII, Issue 4, p. 738–752.
  41. Stanton G.H., The Eight Stages of Genocide, in: The Genocide Studies Reader, eds S. Totten, P.R. Bartrop, Routledge, New York, London 2009, p. 127–129.
  42. Staub E., The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence, Cambridge University Press, New York 1989.
  43. Van Dijk T., Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
  44. Van Dijk T., Politics, Ideology and Discourse, in: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Volume on Politics and Language, eds. Ruth Wodak, Elsevier, Amsterdam 2005, p. 728–740.
  45. Van Dijk T., Critical Discourse Analysis, in: Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, H. Hamilton, Blackwell, Oxford 2001, p. 352–71.
  46. Volpato C., Andrighetto L., Dehumanization, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 2015, p. 31–37.
  47. Wodak R., The Discourse of Politics in Action, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2009.
  48. Wodak R., & Meyer M. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE Publications Ltd, London 2009.
  49. LIST OF SOURCES
  50. Dubrovin D., The First Hybrid War: Blood, Lies and Hydrocarbons, April 20, 2022 / Дубровин Д., Первая гибридная война: кровь, ложь и углеводороды, 20 апреля 2022, https://tass.ru/opinions/14415359?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google.com.Ivanyuga E, Ukraine as a quasi-state, June 10, 2022, https://zavtra.ru/blogs/ukraina_kak_kvazigosudarstvo.
  51. Roy O. Ukrainianism is a Fusion of Nazism and Manipulation. The War Will Not End until the Very Idea of Ukrainianism is Eradicated. “Sight. Business newspaper”. April 7, 2022. / Олег Рой. Украинство – сплав ацизма и манипуляцииВойна не закончится до тех пор, пока не будет искоренена сама идея украинства. Взгляд. Деловая газета. 7 апреля 2022, https://vz.ru/opinions/2022/4/7/1152532.html.
  52. Surkov V., Ukraine is not. There is Ukrainianism – a Specific Disorder Of Minds / В. Сурков. Украины нет. Есть украинство – специфическое расстройство умов, https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2020/02/26/surkov-ukrainy-net-est-ukrainstvo-specifi cheskoe-rasstroystvo-umov.
  53. Sergeytsev T., What should Russia do with Ukraine? April 3, 2022, https://www.stopfake.org/en/what-should-russia-do-with-ukraine-translation-of-a-propaganda-article-by-a-russian-publication-by/.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.