Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Tom 53 Nr 3 (2025)

Artykuły

New Ways of Researching Women’s Representations in Parliamentary Assemblies: Theoretical Assumptions and Empirical Applications of Feminist Institutionalism

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/STP.2025.53.3.08
Przesłane: 23 grudnia 2024
Opublikowane: 18 grudnia 2025

Abstrakt

Feminist institutionalism is a variant of new institutionalism that focuses on the interplay between formal and informal institutions and the gendered nature of institutions and has been used to study gender dynamics in parliamentary assemblies. The contribution of the article is twofold. Theoretically, it sets out the building blocks, conceptual components and key assumptions of feminist institutionalism and examines the ways in which it differs from other strands of new institutionalism. It demonstrates the range of empirical applications of FI and its potential for future studies of parliamentary assemblies. Furthermore, it contributes to the methodological discussion by showing that while feminist institutionalist research has predominantly used qualitative methods, there is also potential for using quantitative methods to address the questions posed by feminist institutionalist scholars.

Bibliografia

  • Acker, J., ‘From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions’, Contemporary Sociology 21: 5, 1992, pp. 565–69.
  • Ahrens, P., ‘The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in the European Parliament: Taking Advantage of Institutional Power Play’, Parliamentary Affairs 69: 4, 2016, pp. 778–93, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw005.
  • Bacchi, C., and Rönnblom, M., ‘Feminist Discursive Institutionalism: A Poststructural Alternative’, NORA. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 22: 3, 2014, pp. 170–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2013.864701.
  • Beckwith, K., ‘A Common Language of Gender?’, Politics & Gender 1: 01, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X05211017.
  • Berthet, V. et al., Guide to Qualitative Research in Parliaments (Cham:
  • Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39808-7.
  • Berthet, V., and Kantola, J., ‘Gender, Violence, and Political Institutions: Struggles over Sexual Harassment in the European Parliament’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 28: 1, 2021, pp. 143–67, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa015.
  • Bjarnegård, E., and Kenny, M., ‘Revealing the Secret Garden: The Informal Dimensions of Political Recruitment’, Politics and Gender 11: 4, 2015, pp. 748–53, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000471.
  • Chapman, J., ‘The Feminist Perspective’, in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, eds, Theory and Methods in Political Science, 2nd edn. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).
  • Chappell, L., and Waylen, G., ‘Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions’, Public Administration 91: 3, 2013, pp. 599–615, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02104.x.
  • Christmas-Best, V., and Kjaer, U., ‘Why So Few and Why So Slow? Women as Parliamentary Representatives in Europe from a Longitudinal Perspective’, in Democratic Representation in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 77–105, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199234 202.003.0004.
  • Disch, L. and Hawkesworth, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2015), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.001.0001.
  • Driscoll, A., and Krook, M.L., ‘Can There Be a Feminist Rational Choice Institutionalism?’, Politics and Gender 5: 2, 2009, pp. 238–45, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X0900018X.
  • Fortin-Rittberger, J., and Rittberger, B., ‘Do Electoral Rules Matter? Explaining National Differences in Women’s Representation in the European Parliament’, European Union Politics 15: 4, 2014, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1465116514527179.
  • Franceschet, S., and Piscopo, J.M., ‘Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power, Parties, and Elite Political Networks in Argentina’, Comparative Political Studies 47: 1, 2014, pp. 85–110, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0010414013489379
  • Gallagher, M., and Marsh, M., Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics (London: Sage Publications, 1988).
  • Gale Mazur, A., and Hoard, S., ‘Gendering Comparative Policy Studies: Towards Better Science’, in Comparative Policy Studies, 2014, https:// doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154.
  • Guy Peters, B., Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism (Pinter, 1999).
  • Helmke, G., and Levitsky, S., ‘Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda’, Perspectives on Politics 2: 4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001219.00011.
  • Hopkinson, N., Parliamentary Democracy: Is There a Perfect Model? (Routledge, 2001), https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196787.
  • Kantola, J., and Lombardo, E., ‘Feminist Political Analysis: Exploring Strengths, Hegemonies and Limitations’, Feminist Theory 18: 3, 2017, pp. 323–41, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117721882.
  • Kantola, J., and Lombardo, E., ‘The European Parliament as a Gender Equality Actor: A Contradictory Forerunner’, in Handbook of Feminist Governance (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023), pp. 299–310, https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap-oa/book/9781800374812/book-part-9781800374812-33.xml.
  • Kantola, J., and Rolandsen Agustín, L., ‘Gendering the Representative Work of the European Parliament: A Political Analysis of Women MEP’s Perceptions of Gender Equality in Party Groups’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57: 4, 2019, pp. 768–86, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12885.
  • Kantola, J., and Waylen, G., “Analysing Legislatures Using a Feminist Institutionalist Lens’, European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2024, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088Y2024D000000048.
  • Kenny, M., Gender and Political Recruitment (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013), https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271945.
  • Kenny, M., and Verge, T., ‘Opening Up the Black Box: Gender and Candidate Selection in a New Era’, Government and Opposition 51: 3, 2016, pp. 351–69, https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.5.
  • Kulawik, T., ‘Staking the Frame of a Feminist Discursive Institutionalism’, Politics and Gender 5: 2, 2009, pp. 262–71, https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1743923X0900021X.
  • Laurel Weldon, S., ‘Using Statistical Methods to Study Institutions’, Politics & Gender 10: 4, 2014, pp. 661–72, https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1743923X14000464.
  • Leach, S., and Lowndes, V., ‘Of Roles and Rules: Analysing the Changing Relationship between Political Leaders and Chief Executives in Local Government’, Public Policy and Administration 22: 2, 2007, pp. 183–200, https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076707075892.
  • Lovenduski, J., ‘Foreword’, in Mona Lena Krook and Fiona Mackay, eds, Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).
  • Lowndes, V., ‘How Are Political Institutions Gendered?’, Political Studies 68: 3, 2020, pp. 548–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719867667.
  • Lowndes, V., and Roberts, M., Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
  • Mackay, F., Kenny, M., and Chappell, L., ‘New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?’, International Political Science Review 31: 5, 2010, pp. 573–88, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110388788.
  • Mackay, F., Monro, S., and Waylen, G., ‘The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism’, Politics and Gender 5: 2, 2009, pp. 253–62, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09000208.
  • Ostrom, E., ‘Institutional Rational Choice’, in P. Sabatier, ed., Theories of the Policy Process (Routledge, 2019), https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780367274689-2.
  • Palmieri, S., ‘Feminist Institutionalism and Gender-Sensitive Parliaments: Relating Theory and Practice’, in M. Sawer and K. Baker, eds, Gender Innovation in Political Science (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019), pp. 173–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75850-3_9.
  • Piscopo, J. M., ‘When Informality Advantages Women: Quota Networks, Electoral Rules and Candidate Selection in Mexico’, Government and Opposition 51: 3, 2016, pp. 487–512, https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.11.
  • Puwar, N., ‘Thinking About Making a Difference’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6: 1, 2004, pp. 65–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00127.x.
  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., ‘Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 34; 1, 2009, p. 6, https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009787500330.
  • Scott, J.W., ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’, The American Historical Review 91: 5, 1986, pp. 1053–75, https://doi.org/10.2307/1864376.
  • Stauffer, K.E., and O’Brien, D.Z., ‘Quantitative Methods and Feminist Political Science’, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (Oxford University Press, 2018), p. 5, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.210.
  • Tucker, E., ‘Feminist Political Theory’, in Michael T Gibbons et al., eds, The Encyclopaedia of Political Thought (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014), pp. 1033–36, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.
  • Verge, T., ‘The Gender Regime of Political Parties: Feedback Effects between Supply and Demand’, Politics and Gender 11: 4, 2015, pp. 754–59, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000483.
  • Walby, S., ‘The European Union and Gender Equality: Emergent Varieties of Gender Regime’, Social Politics 11: 1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxh024.
  • Walby, S., ‘Varieties of Gender Regimes’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 27: 3, 2020, pp. 414–31, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa018.
  • Waylen, G., ‘Gendering Institutional Change’, in Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics (Oxford University Press, 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.237.
  • Waylen, G., ‘What Can Historical Institutionalism Offer Feminist Institutionalists?’, Politics and Gender 5: 2, 2009, pp. 245–53, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09000191.
  • Whitaker, R., ‘A Case of “You Can Always Get What You Want’? Committee Assignments in the European Parliament’, Parliamentary Affairs 72: 1, 2019, pp. 62–81, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy010.
  • van der Vleuten, J.M., ‘The European Parliament as a Constant Promoter of Gender Equality: Another European Myth?’, in Petra Ahrens and Lise Rolandsen Agustín, eds, Gendering the European Parliament: Structures, Policies and Practices (European Conference on Politics and Gender, Colchester: ECPR Press, 2019).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.