Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Civitas baner

Vol. 31 (2022)

Afekty - praktyki i dyskursy

From National Fantasies to Attachment Theory: Lauren Berlant’s Cultural Criticism in Light of British Developmental Psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/CIV.2022.31.01
Submitted: June 6, 2022
Published: 2023-02-16

Abstract

The article surveys Lauren Berlant’s ideas concerning the emotional functioning of the human being in the context of neoliberal capitalism and argues for their limitation resulting from Berlant’s focus on the society-ideology axis while overlooking the significance of the early bonds in the development of one’s emotional regulation. Contrary to the multiple Marxist interpretations of culture, Berlant emphasizes that politics is effective by shaping human fantasies of desire rather than merely producing ideology. In the case of the United States this mechanism mainly refers to creating a collective hope for a “good life”, which is carried on within the paradigm of the Weberian protestant ethics: through hard work, perseverance and self-reliance, that is according to the myth of the American dream. Simultaneously, authors working within the field of developmental psychology demonstrate the key significance of human early attachments for the shaping of one’s self-trust and emotional balance, which enables a more critical attitude towards the cultural norms of happiness and makes it possible to find satisfaction not through responding to the fantasies generated by culture, but through relationships with other empirically existing human beings. The article thus maintains that works by psychologists such as Donald Woods Winnicott, John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth fill in a significant void in Berlant’s writings and give hope for an overcoming of the “cruel optimism” impasse.

References

  1. Ahmed S., The Cultural Politics of Emotions, Edinburgh University Press – Routledge, London–New York 2004.
  2. Althusser L., Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, w: Eadem, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, tłum. B. Brewster, Monthly Review Press, New York 2001 (1970), s. 121–176.
  3. Anderson B., Wspólnoty wyobrażeniowe. Rozważania o źródłach i rozprzestrzenianiu się nacjonalizmu, tłum. S. Amsterdamski, Znak, Warszawa–Kraków 1997.
  4. Baym N., Melodramat osaczonej męskości. Jak teorie literatury amerykańskiej marginalizują twórczość kobiet, w: A. Preis-Smith (red.), Kultura, tekst, ideologia. Dyskursy współczesnej amerykanistyki, tłum. M. Paryż, Universitas, Kraków 2004 (1981), s. 278.
  5. Bennett J., Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press, Durham 2010.
  6. Berlant L., The Anatomy of National Fantasy: Hawthorne, Utopia, and Everyday Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago1991.
  7. Berlant L., The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship, Duke University Press, Durham 1997.
  8. Berlant L., The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture, Duke University Press, Durham 2008.
  9. Berlant L., Cruel Optimism, Duke University Press, Durham 2011.
  10. Bersani L., The Freudian Body: Psychoanalysis and Art, Columbia University Press, New York 1986.
  11. Bowlby J., A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development, Tavistock, London 1988.
  12. Bowlby J., Forty-Four Juvenile Thieves: Their Character and Home-Life, Bailliere, Tindall & Cox, London 1946.
  13. Bowlby J., The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds, Tavistock, London 1979.
  14. Burzyńska A., Afekt – podejrzany i pożądany, w: R. Nycz i in. (red.), Kultura afektu, afekty w kulturze: Humanistyka po zwrocie afektywnym, Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, Warszawa 2015, s. 115–134.
  15. Clough P.T. i J. Halley (red.), The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, Duke University Press, Durham 2007.
  16. Cusset F., French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States, Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis 2008.
  17. Cvetkovich A., Depression: A Public Feeling, Duke University Press, Durham 2012.
  18. Emerson R.W., Self-Reliance, w: The Norton Anthology of American Literature 1820–1865, t. B, red. N. Baym, Norton and Company, New York–London 2003, s. 1160–1176.
  19. Foucault M., Historia seksualności, tłum. T. Komendant, Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza Czytelnik, Warszawa 2000 (1976).
  20. Foucault M., Nadzorować i karać, tłum. T. Komendant, Wydawnictwo Fundacji Aletheia i Wydawnictwo Spacja, Warszawa 1993 (1975).
  21. Freud Z., Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, W. W. Norton, New York 1905 (1960).
  22. Freud Z., Przypominanie, powtarzanie i przepracowanie, tłum. A. Czownicka, w: K. Pospiszyl (red.), Zygmunt Freud. Człowiek i dzieło, Ossolineum, Wrocław 1991, s. 266–273.
  23. Gilligan C., In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1982.
  24. Gregg M., Seigworth G. (red.), The Affect Theory Reader, Duke University Press, Durham 2010.
  25. Guernsey L., Screen Time: How Electronic Media-From Baby Videos to Educational Software-Affects Your Young Child, Basic Books, New York 2012.
  26. Hazan C., Shaver Ph., Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 1987, t. 52, s. 511–524.
  27. Hochschild A., The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, University of California Press, Oakland, CA 2012.
  28. Hsu H., Affect Theory and the New Age of Anxiety, „New Yorker”, 18 marca 2019, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/25/affect-theory-and-the-new-age-of-anxiety (dostęp: 23.10.2023).
  29. Illouz E., Uczucia w dobie kapitalizmu, tłum. Z. Siembierowicz, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2010 (2007).
  30. Jeffords S., Masculinity as Excess in Vietnam Films: The Father/Son Dynamic of American Culture, w: R. Warhol-Down, D. Price Herndl (red.), Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick 1997.
  31. Kolodny A., Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience and History in American Life and Letters, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 1975.
  32. Kosofsky-Sedgwick E., Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Duke University Press, Durham 2003.
  33. Lacan J., The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience, w: idem, Ecrits, tłum. i red. B. Fink, W.W. Norton, New York 1949, s. 75–81.
  34. Lockman J.J., C.S. Tamis-LeMonda, The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development: Brain, Behavior, and Cultural Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2020.
  35. Miranda R., E.L. Jeglic (red.), Handbook of Youth Suicide Prevention: Integrating Research into Practice, Springer, Berlin 2021.
  36. Muñoz J. E., Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity, New York University Press, New York 2009.
  37. Myrdzik B., O niektórych konsekwencjach zwrotu afektywnego w badaniach kulturowych, „Annales N-Educatio Nova” 2017, t. 2.
  38. Ngai S., Ugly Feelings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 2005.
  39. Nycz R. i in. (red.), Kultura afektu, afekty w kulturze: Humanistyka po zwrocie afektywnym, Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, Warszawa 2015.
  40. Seitz D.K., On Citizenship and Optimism: Lauren Berlant [wywiad z Lauren Berlant], „Society+Space”. 23 marca 2013, https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/on-citizenship-and-optimism (dostęp: 23.10.2023).
  41. Shelton M., Fundamentals of LGBT Substance Use Disorders: Multiple Identities, Multiple Challenges, Harrington Park Press, New York 2017.
  42. Steele M., Breaking Cycles of Neglect Using Attachment Research, „Research Matters” 2015, http://socialresearchmatters.org/breaking-cycles-of-neglect-using-attachment-research-miriam-steele/ (dostęp: 23.10.2023).
  43. Talley S.D., Healing Trauma through Intergenerational Bonds in Attachment, „Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences” 2018, t. 110(4), s. 14-21, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.14307/JFCS110.4.14.
  44. Tomkins J., West of Everything: The Inner Life of Westerns, Oxford University Press, New York 1992.
  45. Wierzchowska J., Motherless Subjects and Mothered Selves: The Implications of Jacques Lacan’s and Donald Winnicott’s Writings on the Formation of the ‘I’ for American Studies, „Comparative American Studies. An International Journal” 2019, t. 16(1–2), s. 1–17, DOI: 10.1080/14775700.2019.1617518.
  46. Winnicott D.W., Playing and Reality, Routledge, London–New York 1971.
  47. Winnicott D.W., Mirror-Role of Mother and Family in Child Development, w: idem, Playing and Reality, Tavistock, London 1967, s. 149–159.
  48. Winnicott D.W., The Child, the Family, and the outside World, Middlesex, North Brunswick, NJ, 1973.
  49. Winnicott D.W., The Theory of the Parent-Infant Relationship, „The International Journal of Psychoanalysis” 1960, t. 41, s. 585–595.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.