Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 64 No. 2 (2020): ENGAGED ANTHROPOLOGY IN A TIME OF GROWING NATIONALISM

Articles and essays

At the Crossroads of Modernity: Critical Anthropology in Contemporary Europe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2020.64.2.4
Submitted: October 22, 2020
Published: 2020-06-25

Abstract

This article addresses anthropological involvement in a political sphere constituted by the politicization of “difference” in European modernity projects, and in this context, especially conflicts related to gender, sexuality, race, nationality/ethnicity, or religious beliefs, which result in visions of antagonized, political Others. The author refers to the autoethnographic perspective and discusses her own disciplinary practices from the mid-nineties to today, pointing to the positive and negative sides of those practices. She first discusses the idea of critical anthropology as an element of academic activist debates within gender and queer studies. Then she looks at a more academic position, which makes critical anthropology into an instrument for creating images of a better future. Ultimately, she advocates a vision of critical anthropology that focuses on affective agency, thanks to which conflicting factions may perceive shared experiences and feelings. She does not assume that this kind of critical engagement is capable of bringing about broader social or political change, but believes it could make a contribution to acceptance of the Other on the micro-scale.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. “Writing against Culture.” In: Richard G. Fox (ed.). Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  2. Ahmed, Sarah. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion: Second Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  3. Ammaturo, Francesca Romana. 2017. European Sexual Citizenship: Human Rights, Bodies and Identities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Appadurai, Arjun. 2013. The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition. London: Verso.
  5. Baer, Monika. 2018a. “Social Activity of Women in the Dobrzeń Wielki Commune in Light of Anthropological Critique.” In: Petr Skalník (ed.). Mutual Impact: Conflict, Tension and Cooperation in Opole Silesia. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
  6. Baer, Monika. 2018b. “’No bo tym się żyło’: Podział gminy Dobrzeń Wielki w narracjach jej mieszkańców”. Prace Etnograficzne 46(4): 111–133 (DOI: 10.4467/22999558.PE.18.022.10165).
  7. Baer, Monika. 2019. “Anthropology and Gender/Queer Studies in Contemporary Poland: A Personally Situated View.” In: Michał Buchowski (ed.). Twilight Zone Anthropology: A Voice from Poland, Herefordshire: Sean Kingston Publishing.
  8. Baer, Monika. 2020a. “Europeanization on the Move: The LGBT/Q Activist Projects in Contemporary Poland.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 6(3).
  9. Baer, Monika. 2020b. „Antropologia krytyczna jako ustrojstwo: Subiektywne refleksje z autoetnograficzną mikrohistorią w tle.” In: Anna Brzezińska, Wojciech Dohnal (eds.). Myśli — pasje — działania: Sto lat etnologii uniwersyteckiej w Poznaniu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Instytutu im. Oskara Kolberga.
  10. Basiuk, Tomasz. 2012. „Coming out a queer: Kontekst amerykański, kontekst polski.” In: Monika Kłosowska, Mariusz Drozdowski, Agata Stasińska (eds.). Strategie queer: Od teorii do praktyki. Warszawa: Difin.
  11. Buchowski, Michał. 2001. Rethinking Transformation. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Humaniora.
  12. Buchowski, Michał. 2004. “European Integration and the Question of National Identity: Fear and Its Consequences.” The Polish Review 49(3): 891–901.
  13. Červinková, Hana. 2012. “Feminist Theory, Anthropology and Engagement.” Zeszyty Etnologii Wrocławskiej 1(16): 25–36.
  14. Červinková, Hana. 2019. “Nauczanie i uczenie się antropologii w edukacji nauczycieli.” In: Hana Červinková (ed.). Antropologia i edukacja: Etnograficzne badania edukacyjne w tradycji amerykańskiej. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
  15. Delanty, Gerard. 2013. Formations of European Modernity: A Historical and Political Sociology of Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Dybska, Aneta. 2016. Regeneration, Citizenship, and Justice in the American City since the 1970s. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  17. Dzenovska, Dace, Nicholas De Genova. 2018. “Introduction: Desire for the Political in the Aftermath of the Cold War.” Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 80: 1–15 (DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2018.800101).
  18. Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams, Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12(1), art. 10 (DOI: 10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589).
  19. Fabian, Johannes. 2000. “Dilemmas of Critical Anthropology.” In: Johannes Fabian. Time and the Work of Anthropology: Critical Essays 1971–1991. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
  20. Farris, Sarah. 2017. In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
  21. Fassin, Éric. 2010. “Identities and Transnational Intimacies: Sexual Democracy and the Politics of Immigration in Europe.” Public Culture 22(3): 507–529 (DOI: 10.1215/08992363-2010-007).
  22. Fortun, Kim. 2012. “Ethnography in Late Industrialism.” Cultural Anthropology 27(3): 446–464 (DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01153.x).
  23. Goodale, Mark. 2017. Anthropology and Law: A Critical Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  24. Grabowska, Magdalena. 2009. “Pomiędzy Wschodem i Zachodem: Problem tożsamości polskiego feminizmu w kontekście współczesnych debat.” In: Bogusława Budrowska (ed.). Kobiety, feminizm, demokracja. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
  25. Graham, Mark. 2009. “LGBT Rights in the European Union: A Queer Affair?” In: Ellen Lewin, William L. Leap (eds.). Out in Public: Reinventing Lesbian/Gay Anthropology in a Globalizing World. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  26. Hage, Ghassan. 2012. “Critical Anthropological Thought and the Radical Political Imaginary Today.” Critique of Anthropology 32(3): 285–308 (DOI: 10.1177/0308275X12449105).
  27. Hertzog, Esther. 2019. Ibtisam and Myself: A Story of Love and Cooperation on the Background of Implicit Hostility, paper presented at the IUAES Inter-Congress “World Solidarities”, 27–31 August, Poznań.
  28. Höhne, Marek Sancho. 2019, Solidarity and Difference in Current Trans* Communities, paper presented at the IUAES Inter-Congress “World Solidarities”, 27–31 August, Poznań.
  29. Höhne, Marek Sancho, Clara Woopen. 2018. “Lola für Demokratie in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern — geschlechterreflektierte Arbeit für eine demokratische Kultur.” Newsletter für Engagement und Partizipation in Deutschland 23: 1–4.
  30. Husakouskaya, Nadzeya. 2019. “Geopolitical Transition of the European Body in Ukraine.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 28(1): 79–83 (DOI: 10.3167/ajec.2019.280110).
  31. Keinz, Anika, Paweł Lewicki. 2019. “Who Embodies Europe? Explorations into the Construction of European Bodies.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 28(1): 7–24 (DOI: 10.3167/ajec.2019.280104).
  32. Korolczuk, Elżbieta, Agnieszka Graff. 2018. “Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: The Anti-colonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43(4): 797–821 (DOI: 10.1086/696691).
  33. Lutz, Catherine. 2017. “What Matters.” Cultural Anthropology 32(3): 181–191 (DOI: 10.14506/ca32.2.02).
  34. Massad, Joseph A. 2007. Desiring Arabs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  35. Marcus, George E. 2007. “Collaborative Imaginaries.” Taiwan Journal of Anthropology 5(1): 1–17.
  36. Marcus, George E., Michael M. J. Fischer, 1999, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences: Second Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  37. Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political: Thinking in Action. London: Routledge.
  38. Mutman, Mahmut. 2006. “Writing Culture: Postmodernism and Ethnography.” Anthropological Theory 6(2): 153–178 (DOI: 10.1177/1463499606065033).
  39. Ortner, Sherry B. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126–166 (DOI: 10.1017/s0010417500010811).
  40. Ortner, Sherry B. 2016. “Dark Anthropology and Its Others: Theory since the Eighties.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1) (DOI: 10.14318/hau6.1.004).
  41. Owczarzak, Jill. 2009. “Introduction: Postcolonial Studies and Postsocialism in Eastern Europe.” Focaal-European Journal of Anthropology 53: 3–19 (DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2009.5301010).
  42. Puar, Jasbir. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
  43. Puar, Jasbir. 2013. “Rethinking Homonationalism.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 45(2): 336–339 (DOI:10.1017/S002074381300007X).
  44. Rabinow, Paul. 2003. Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  45. Rabinow, Paul, George E. Marcus, James D. Faubion, Tobias Rees. 2008. Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Durham: Duke University Press.
  46. Rawłuszko, Marta. 2019. “And If the Opponents of Gender Ideology Are Right? Gender Politics, Europeanization, and the Democratic Deficit.” Politics and Gender (DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X19000576).
  47. Renkin, Hadley Z. 2015. “Perverse Frictions: Pride, Dignity, and the Budapest LGBT March.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 80(3): 409–432 (DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2013.879197).
  48. Rosaldo, Renato. 1994. “Cultural Citizenship in San Jose, California.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 17(2): 57–64 (DOI: 10.1525/pol.1994.17.2.57).
  49. Sroczyński, Grzegorz, Tomasz Terlikowski. 2019. “PiS to nie są konserwatyści. Grają rolę obyczajowej prawicy, ale grzeje ich tylko władza” (http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/7,114883,25172442,terlikowski-pis-to-nie-sa-konserwatysci-graja-role-obyczajowej.html [09.09.2019]).
  50. Svašek, Maruška. 2008. “Introduction: Postsocialism and the Politics of Emotions.” In: Maruška Svašek (ed.). Postsocialism: Politics and Emotions in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Berghahn Books.
  51. Valentine, David. 2003.“’The Calculus of Pain’: Violence, Anthropological Ethics, and the Category Transgender.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 68(1): 27–48 (DOI: 10.1080/0014184032000060353).
  52. Verloo, Mieke, David Paternotte. 2018. “The Feminist Project under Threat in Europe.” Politics and Governance 6(3): 1–5 (DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1736).
  53. Wilson, Richard A. 2007. “Conclusion: Tyrannosaurus Lex: The Anthropology of Human Rights and Transnational Law.” In: Mark Goodale. Sally E. Merry (eds.). The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.