Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
KiS baner

Tom 65 Nr 3 (2021)

Artykuły i rozprawy

Początek epidemii w oczach uczestników programu Erasmus+: Perspektywa teorii podejmowania decyzji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2021.65.3.4
Przesłane: 18 grudnia 2021
Opublikowane: 28 września 2021

Abstrakt

The COVID-19 pandemic has proved a development that has increased feelings of uncertainty and threat. Students participating in the Erasmus+ exchange were suddenly faced with the choice of completing the scholarship or resigning from it and returning to Poland. This study shows that the sudden closure of universities and the students’ isolation evoked a feeling of insecurity among the programme’s participants. In particular, students who decided to return to Poland felt more stress than those who stayed abroad. The findings also present the complex issues of decision-making in the face of uncertainty. Students covered by the survey gave the need for a sense of agency and security as justification for their actions. The study’s results suggest that both groups coped with the cognitive dissonance justifying their decisions.

Bibliografia

  1. Ahmed Md Zahir i in., 2020, Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and Associated Psychological Problems, „Asian Journal of Psychiatry”, t. 51 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102092).
  2. Beck Ulrich, 2002, Społeczeństwo ryzyka. W drodze do innej nowoczesności, tłum. Stanisław Cieśla, Scholar, Warszawa.
  3. Braun Virginia, Clarke Victoria, 2006, Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology, „Qualitative Research in Psychology”, t. 3(2), s. 77–101.
  4. Bukowski Marcin, Kofta Mirosław, 2016, From Coping To Helplessness: Effects Of Control Deprivation On Cognitive And Affective Processes, w: Mirosław Bukowski i in. (red.), Coping with Lack of Control in a Social World, Routledge, New York, s. 15–34.
  5. Bukowski Marcin, Sędek Grzegorz, Potoczek Anna, 2020, Poznawcze konsekwencje deprywacji kontroli. Rola niepewności i dynamiki doświadczeń braku kontroli, w: Mirosław Kofta, Anna M. Rędzio (red.), Poczucie kontroli i niepewność: Konsekwencje dla rozumienia świata społecznego, Liberi Libri, Warszawa, s. 53–82.
  6. Caliendo Marco, Fossen Frank M., Kritikos Alexander S., 2009, Risk Attitudes of Nascent Entrepreneurs – New Evidence from an Experimentally Validated Survey, „Small Business Economics”, t. 32(2), s. 153–167.
  7. Chen Juliet Honglei i in., 2020, The Overlooked Minority: Mental Health of International Students Worldwide under the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond, „Asian Journal of Psychiatry”, t. 54, s. 102–333.
  8. Cooper Dominic, 2003, Psychology, Risk and Safety, „Professional Safety”, t. 48(11), s. 39–46.
  9. Czernatowicz-Kukuczka Aneta, Kossowska Małgorzata, Czarnek Gabriela, Szumowska Ewa, Szwed Paulina, 2020, Radzenie sobie z niepewnością na poziomie przekonań i sądów społecznych, w: Mirosław Kofta, Anna M. Rędzio (red.), Poczucie kontroli i niepewność: Konsekwencje dla rozumienia świata społecznego, Liberi Libri, Warszawa, s. 111–139.
  10. Erikson Erik H., 2004, Tożsamość a cykl życia, tłum. Mateusz Żywicki, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
  11. Festinger Leo,1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  12. Gambin Małgorzata i in., 2020, Uwarunkowania objawów depresji i lęku uogólnionego u dorosłych Polaków w trakcie epidemii COVID-19. Raport z pierwszej fali badania podłużnego, s. 1–27 (http://psych.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/sites/98/2020/05/Uwarunkowania_objawow_depresji_leku_w_trakcie_pandemii_raport.pdf [23.03.2021]).
  13. Greco Veronica, Roger D., 2001, Coping with Uncertainty: The Construction and Validation of a New Measure, „Personality and Individual Differences”, t. 31(4), s. 519–534 (doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00156-2).
  14. Greenberg Jeff, Pyszczynski Tom, Solomon Sheldon, 1986, The Causes and Consequences of the Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory, w: Roy F. Baumeister (red.), Public Self and Private Self , Springer, New York, s. 189–212.
  15. Johnson Niall P.A.S., Mueller Juergen, 2002, Updating the Accounts: Global Mortality of the 1918–1920 “Spanish” Influenza Pandemic, „Bulletin of the History of Medicine”, t. 76(1), s. 105–115 (doi: 10.1353/bhm.2002.0022. PMID: 11875246).
  16. Jones Martin, Sugden Roger, 2001, Positive Confirmation Bias in the Acquisition of Information, „Theory and Decision”, t. 50(1), s. 59–99.
  17. Kahneman Daniel, 2013, Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym, tłum. Piotr Szymczak, Media Rodzina, Poznań.
  18. Khadirnavar, A. A., Vanageri, H., Asagi, R. E., 2020, Perceived Stress, Wellbeing and Mental Health of College Students During COVID-19 Pandemic, „Indian Journal of Psychiatric Social Work”, t. 11(2).
  19. Knight Frank H., 1921, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
  20. Kossowska Małgorzata, Szumowska Ewa, 2020, Niepewność i potrzeba domknięcia poznawczego a przetwarzanie informacji, w: Mirosław Kofta, Anna M. Rędzio (red.), Poczucie kontroli i niepewność: Konsekwencje dla rozumienia świata społecznego, Liberi Libri, Warszawa, s. 27–53.
  21. Kulesza Wojciech i in., 2021, We Are Infected with the New, Mutated Virus UO-COVID-19, „Archives of Medical Science”, t. 17(6) (doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.99592).
  22. Lai Agnes Yuen-kwan i in., 2020, Mental Health Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on International University Students, Related Stressors, and Coping Strategies, „Frontiers in Psychiatry”, t. 11 (doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584240).
  23. Lubiewska Katarzyna, 2019, Przywiązanie w kontekście wrażliwości rodzicielskiej, socjalizacji oraz wpływów kulturowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  24. Lupton Deborah, Tulloch John, 2002, „Life would be pretty dull without risk”: Voluntary Risk-Taking and Its Pleasures, „Health, Risk & Society”, t. 4(2), s. 113–124.
  25. Luthar Suniya, Ebbert Ashley M., Kumar Nina L., 2021, Risk and Resilience during Covid-19: A New Study in the Zigler Paradigm of Developmental Science, „Development and Psychopathology”, t. 33(2), s. 565–580 (doi: 10.1017/S0954579420001388).
  26. Marcatto Francesco, Cosulich Anna, Ferrante Donatella, 2015, Once Bitten, Twice Shy: Experienced Regret and Non-Adaptive Choice Switching, PeerJ, 3, e1035.
  27. Matthew-Maich Nancy i in., 2013, Supporting the Uptake of Nursing Guidelines: What You Really Need to Know to Move Nursing Guidelines into Practice. Worldviews on Evidence, „Based Nursing”, t. 10(2), s. 104–115.
  28. McCleskey Jim, Gruda Dritjon, 2021, Risk-Taking, Resilience, and State Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Coming of (Old) Age Story, „Personality and Individual Differences”, t. 170, 110485.
  29. Milburn Thomas W., Billings Robert S.,1976, Decision-Making Perspectives from Psychology: Dealing with Risk and Uncertainty, „American Behavioral Scientist”, t. 20(1), s. 111–126.
  30. Mirucka Beata, Bielecka Urszula, Mirucka Maria, Kępińska Natalia, 2021, „Significant predictors of psychological distress in the group of Polish young adults during the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak: Sequential mediation model” (praca niepublikowana).
  31. Nygren T. E., 1976, Individual Differences in Judgments of Dissimilarity, Preference, and Risk for Simple Three-Outcome Gambles. Paper presented to the joint meeting of the Psychometric Society and Mathematical Psychology Group.
  32. Park Jisook, Hill William Trey, 2018, Exploring the Role of Justification and Cognitive Effort Exertion on Post-Purchase Regret in Online Shopping, „Computers in Human Behavior”, t. 83, s. 235–242 (doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.036).
  33. Parkinson Brian, Simons Gwenda, 2009, Affecting Others: Social Appraisal and Emotion Contagion in Everyday Decision Making, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, t. 35(8), s. 1071–1084.
  34. Pietrzak Edyta, 2011, (Nie)bezpieczeństwo, niepewność i ryzyko jako wartości konsumpcyjne, „Studia Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego”, nr 2.
  35. Pogorzelski Karol, 2014, Ryzyko i niepewność: krótka historia rozróżnienia, „Polityka Społeczna”, t. 41, nr 5–6, s. 5–9.
  36. Qiu Jianyin i in., 2020, A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Chinese People in the COVID-19 Epidemic: Implications and Policy Recommendations, „General Psychiatry”, t. 33(2), s. 19–21 (https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213).
  37. Rettie Hannah, Daniels J., 2020, Coping and Tolerance of Uncertainty: Predictors and Mediators of Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic, „American Psychologist”, August 3, (Advance online publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000710).
  38. Rickard L. N., 2014, Perception of Risk and the Attribution of Responsibility for Accidents, „Risk Analysis”, t. 34(3), s. 514–528.
  39. Satici Begum i in., 2020, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Mental Wellbeing: Serial Mediation by Rumination and Fear of COVID-19, „International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction”, t. 15, s. 1–12.
  40. Sędek Grzegorz, Kofta Mirosław, 1990, When Cognitive Exertion Does Not Yield Cognitive Gain: Toward an Informational Explanation of Learned Helplessness, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, t. 58(4), s. 729–743 (doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.4.729).
  41. Sędek Grzegorz, McIntosh Daniel N.,1996, „Uncontrollability and dual task processing: Results of experimental and educational studies” (praca niepublikowana).
  42. Siegel Sydney, Goldstein Donald Aaron,1959, Decision-Making Behavior in a Two-Choice Uncertain Outcome Situation, „Journal of Experimental Psychology”, t. 57(1), s. 37–42 (https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045959).
  43. Simon Herbert A., 1972, Theories of Bounded Rationality, „Decision and Organization”, t. 1(1), s. 161–176.
  44. Sjåstad Hallgeir, Van Bavel Jay, 2020, The Best-Case Heuristic in Risk Prediction: Hopes and Fears in a Global Health Pandemic (COVID-19) (doi: 10.31234/osf.io/pcj4f).
  45. Steinberg Laurence, 2013, The Influence of Neuroscience on US Supreme Court Decisions about Adolescents’ Criminal Culpability, „Nature Reviews Neuroscience”, t. 14(7), s. 513–518 (doi: 10.1038/nrn3509).
  46. Tsukamoto Masashi, Kohara Kenichiro, Takeuchi Koji, 2017, Effects of Effort and Difficulty on Human Preference for a Stimulus: Investigation of the Within-Trial Contrast, „Learning & Behavior”, t. 45(2), s. 135–146.
  47. Tversky Amos, Kahneman Daniel, 1973, Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, „Cognitive Psychology”, t. 5(2), s. 207–232.
  48. Wielgopolan Adrianna, Pastwa Maciej, Warkocka Aleksandra, Imbir Kamil, 2021, „Anyone but me: unrealistic optimism, emotions, and anxiety in the face of COVID-19 pandemic” (praca niepublikowana).
  49. Wilczewski Michał, Gorbaniuk Oleg, Giuri Paola, 2021, The Psychological and Academic Effects of Studying from the Home and Host Country during the COVID-19 Pandemic, „Frontiers in Psychology”, 12.
  50. Zatoń Wojciech, 2010, Żal i inne aspekty psychologiczne podejmowania decyzji finansowych na przykładzie problemu opcji walutowych w przedsiębiorstwach w Polsce w 2008 roku, w: Paweł Dittmann, Ewa Szabela-Pasierbińska (red.), Prognozowanie w zarządzaniu firmą, „Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” (103).
  51. Zimbardo Philip G., Boyd John N., 1999, Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable, Individual Differences Metric, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, t. 77(6), s. 1271–1288 (doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271).
  52. Zinn Jens O., 2004, Health, Risk and Uncertainty in the Life Course: A Typology of Biographical Certainty Constructions, „Social Theory & Health”, t. 2(3), s. 199–221.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.