Tom 69 Nr 4 (2025): Granice symboliczne w komunikacji społecznej
Artykuły i rozprawy
Tokenism or Inclusion? Symbolic Boundaries Between “Us” and “Them” in the Polish Queer Community’s Reception of LGBT+ Ads
University of Silesia in Katowice
Abstrakt
Reprezentacja osób LGBT+ w reklamie wywołuje zróżnicowane reakcje, kształtowane przez tożsamość społeczną, normy kulturowe i indywidualne przekonania. Takie przedstawienia mogą budzić zarówno akceptację, jak i opór, szczególnie w państwach takich jak Polska, w których prawa osób LGBT+ pozostają kwestią sporną. Niniejsze badanie zawiera analizę reakcji polskiej społeczności queer na reklamy z motywami LGBT+. Autorka wykorzystuje przy tym teorię tożsamości społecznej oraz koncepcję granic symbolicznych. Wyniki analizy wywiadów fokusowych ujawniły napięcie między potrzebą autentycznej reprezentacji a obawami o tokenizm i motywacje komercyjne. Zastosowanie konstruktywistycznej teorii ugruntowanej pomogło zrozumieć, w jaki sposób osoby queer odbierają przekazy reklamowe, pozwoliło sformułować wnioski na temat mediów, tożsamości i inkluzywnego marketingu w spolaryzowanych społeczeństwach.
Bibliografia
- Aaker Jennifer, Brumbaugh Anne, Grier Sonya, 2008, Nontarget Markets and Viewer Distinctiveness: The Impact of Target Marketing on Advertising Attitudes, „Journal of Consumer Psychology”, vol. 9(3), pp. 127-40.
- Angelini James, Bradley Samuel, 2010, Homosexual Imagery in Print Advertisements: Attended, Remembered, But Disliked, “Journal of Homosexuality”, vol. 57(4), pp. 485-502.
- Appiah Osei, 2001, Ethnic Identification on Adolescents’ Evaluations of Advertisements, “Journal of Advertising Research”, vol. 41(5), pp. 7-22.
- Barbour Rosaline, 2011, Badania fokusowe, tłum. Barbara Komorowska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
- Bhat Subodh, Leight Thomas, Wardlow Daniel, 1996, The effect of homosexual imaginary in advertising on attitude toward the ad, “Journal of Homosexuality”, vol. 31(1-2), pp. 161-176.
- Charmaz Kathy, 2000, Grounded Theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods, in: Norman Denzin (ed.), Yvonna Lincoln (ed.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 509-531.
- Charmaz Kathy, 2006, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, Sage Publications, London.
- Cunningham George, Melton Nicole, 2014, Signals and cues: LGBT inclusive advertising and consumer attraction, „Services Marketing Quarterly”, vol. 23(1), pp. 37-46.
- Dimitrieska Savica, Stamevska Elizabeta, Stankovska Aleksandra, 2019, Inclusive Marketing – Reality or Make Up, “Economics and Management”, vol. 16(2), pp. 112-119.
- Eisend Martin, Hermann Erik, 2019, Consumer Responses to Homosexual Imaginery in Advertising: A Meta-Analysis, “Journal of Advertising”, vol. 48(8), pp. 380-400.
- Gerbner George, 1967, Newsmen and Schoolmen: the State and Problems of Education Reporting, „Journalism Quarterly”, vol. 44(2), pp. 211-224.
- Gerbner George, 1998, Cultivation Analysis: An Overview, „Mass Communication & Society”, vol. 1(3/4), pp. 175-194.
- Gerbner George, Gross Larry, 1976, Living With Television: The Violence Profile, „Journal of Communication”, vol. 26(2), pp. 173-99.
- Grier Sonya, Brumbaugh Anne, Thornton Corliss, 2006, Crossover Dreams: Consumer Responses to Ethnic-Oriented Products, “Journal of Marketing”, vol. 70(2), pp. 35-51.
- Hooten Mary, Noeva Kristina, Hammonds Frank, 2009, The Effects of Homosexual Imaginery in Advertisements on Brand Perception and Purchase Intention, “Social Behaviour and Personality: an international journal”, vol. 37(9), pp. 1231-1238.
- Johnson Guillaume, Elliott Roger, Grier Sonya, 2010, Conceptualizing Multicultural Advertising Effects in the “New” South Africa, “Journal of Global Marketing”, vol. 23(3), pp. 189-207.
- Keller Reiner, Charmaz Kathy, 2016, A Personal Journey with Grounded Theory Methodology. Kathy Charmaz in Conversation With Reiner Keller, “Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 17(1), n.p.
- Kim Kacy, Um Namhyun, Kwon Eun, Wilcox David, 2013, Symbols or Icons in Gay-Themed Ads: How to Target a Gay Audience, „Journal of Marketing Communications, vol. 21(6), pp. 1-15.
- Kitzinger Jenny, 2005, Focus Group Research: Using Group Dynamics to Explore Perceptions, Experiences and Understandings, in: Immy Holloway (ed.), Qualitative Research in Health Care, Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp. 56-6.
- Lamont Michèle, 2010, Looking back at Bourdieu, in: Silva Elizabeth (ed.), Warde Alan (ed.), Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Setting Accounts and Developing Alternatives, Routledge, London.
- Lamont Michèle, 2012, How has Bourdieu been good to think with? The case of the United States, „Sociological Forum”, vol. 27, pp. 228-237.
- Lamont Michèle, Molnár Virag, 2002, The study of boundaries in the social sciences, „Annual Review of Sociology”, vol. 28, pp. 167-195.
- Lamont Michèle, Pendergrass Sabrina, Pachucki Mark, 2015, Symbolic Boundaries, in: James Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), Elselvier, Oxford, pp. 850-855.
- Liamputtong Pranee, 2015, Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice, Sage Publications, London.
- Morgan David, 2021, Robert Merton and the History of Focus Groups: Standing on the Shoulders of a Giant?, „The American Sociologist”, vol. 53(3), pp. 364-373.
- Oakenfull Gillian, 2013, What Matters: Factors Influencing Gay Consumers’ Evaluations of “Gay-Friendly” Corporate Activities, “Journal of Public Policy & Marketing”, vol. 32, pp. 79-89.
- Oakenfull Gillian, Greenlee Timothy, 2004, The three rules of crossing over from gay media to mainstream media advertising: lesbians, lesbians, lesbians, “Journal of Business Research, vol. 57(11), pp. 1276-1285.
- Oakenfull Gillian, Greenlee Timothy, 2005, Queer eye for a gay guy: Using market-specific symbols in advertising to attract gay consumers without alienating the mainstream, „Psychology and Marketing”, vol. 22(5), pp. 421-439.
- Oakenfull Gillian, Mccarthy Michael, Greenlee Timothy, 2008, Targeting a Minority Without Alienating the Majority: Advertising to Gays and Lesbians in Mainstream Media, “Journal of Advertising Research”, vol. 48(2), pp. 191-198.
- Read Glenna, Driel Irene, Potter Robert, 2018, Same-Sex Couples in Advertisements: An Investigation of the Role of Implicit Attitudes on Cognitive Processing and Evaluation, “Journal of Advertising”, vol. 47(1), pp. 1-16.
- Tajfel Henri, 1978, Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco.
- Tajfel Henri, Turner John, 1986, The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour, in: William Austin (ed.), Stephen Worchel (ed.), Psychology of Intergroup Relation, Hall Publishers, Chicago, pp. 7-24.
- The three rules of crossing over from gay media to mainstream media advertising: lesbians, lesbians, lesbians. Journal of Buisness Research, 57, 1276-1285.
- Turner John, Hogg Michael, Oakes Penelope, Reicher Stephen, Wetherell Margaret, 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, New York.
- Um Namhyun, 2016, Consumers’ Responses to Implicit and Explicit Gay-Themed Advertising in Gay vs. Mainstream Media, „Journal of Promotion Management”, vol. 22(3), pp. 461-477.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
