Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 65 No. 1 (2021): THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Articles and essays

Analyzing Memetic Isolation Fantasy Themes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Normalization of a Previously Unknown Social Problem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.5
Submitted: June 21, 2021
Published: March 22, 2021

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze memes about social isolation introduced in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic. The author’s contact with memes during the first weeks of the pandemic (March–April) was initially motivated only by the desire to fill leisure time in such strange circumstances as the time of quarantine. With time, the observation began to take on a more systematic character, and the images found on the web became an interesting research material illustrating strategies undertaken to normalize and familiarize people with forced isolation and imposed social distancing, measures previously unknown in society on such a large scale. The material thus collected was analyzed using the fantasy themes analysis (FTA) method.

References

  1. Bormann, Ernest G., John F. Cragan, Donald Shields. 1996. “An Expansion of the Rhetorical Vision Component of the Symbolic Convergence Theory: The Cold War Paradigm Case”. Communication Monographs 63(1): 1–28.
  2. Czyżewski, Marek. 2010. “‘Język wrogości’ oraz spór o III i IV RP w perspektywie analizy dyskursu publicznego. Wybrane rezultaty projektu badawczego oraz uwagi metodologiczne.” In: Maciej Czerwiński, Paweł Nowak, Renata Przybylska (eds.). Język IV Rzeczypospolitej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
  3. El Kamel, Leila, Benny Rigaux-Bricmont. 2009. “Online Qualitative Research and Metaverses”. Materiały grupy roboczej D-29: Metaverses and 3D environments. IV Kongres Cyber Society: Analog Crisis, Digital Future (http://www.cibersociedad.net/congres2009/en/coms/online-qualitative-research-and-metaverses/482 [accessed: 15.08.2010]).
  4. Foss, Sonja K. 2018. Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice. Illinois: Waveland Press.
  5. Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
  6. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company.
  7. Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2011. “Visual Grounded Theory: A Methodological Outline and Examples from Empirical Work”. Revija za sociologiju 41(2): 131–160.
  8. Kozinets, Robert V. 1998. “On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture.” Advances in Consumer Research 25: 366–371 (http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/8180/volumes/v25/NA-25 [accessed: 06.06.2020]).
  9. Miller, Piotr. 2012. “Wprowadzenie do obserwacji online: warianty i ograniczenia techniki badawczej.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, no. 1: 76–97.
  10. Rybacka, Aleksandra. 2018. “Moderowanie codzienności jako taktyka zdobywania popularności. Analiza modeli ekspresywnych w serwisie Instagram na przykładzie polskich instagramerek parentingowych”. In: Miłosz Babecki, Szymon Żyliński (eds.). Od naturalizacji do funkcjonalizacji. Taktyki użytkowania serwisu Instagram. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko Mazurskiego.
  11. Shields, Donald C. 2000. “Symbolic Convergence and Special Communication Theories: Sensing and Examining Dis/Enchantment with the Theoretical Robustness of Critical Autoethnography”. Communication Monographs 67(4): 392–421.
  12. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1989, “Rozumienie i porozumienie. Filozofia społeczna Alfreda Schütza”,In: Zdzisław Krasnodębski (ed.), Fenomenologia i socjologia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.